【摘要】：關(guān)于上海小刀會(huì)起義的既有研究,在討論其源流演變時(shí)多注意到土/客、閩/粵、上海/周邊、農(nóng)民/游民、會(huì)黨/農(nóng)民武裝等多種復(fù)雜關(guān)系,但在敘事時(shí)為突出革命階級(jí)"聯(lián)合斗爭(zhēng)"的意義,往往又過(guò)分強(qiáng)調(diào)其組織、性質(zhì)的統(tǒng)一性,認(rèn)為各股起義力量之間存在著統(tǒng)一布置、彼此約定、相互支援的同盟關(guān)系,其領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人無(wú)例外地都屬于天地會(huì)成員。文章考訂"嘉定之變"及其領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人周立春的相關(guān)史實(shí),對(duì)前說(shuō)予以修正,并試圖追問(wèn)——?dú)v史上是否實(shí)際存在過(guò)一個(gè)囊括各股力量、形成整體布局的"統(tǒng)一的上海小刀會(huì)"?
[Abstract]:Regarding the existing research on the Shanghai Xiao Dao Society uprising, in discussing the evolution of its origin and course, we have paid more attention to the complex relationships between Turkey / guest, Fujian / Guangdong, Shanghai / periphery, peasants / vagrants, the Party / peasant armed forces, etc. However, in order to highlight the significance of "joint struggle" of revolutionary classes in narration, they often put too much emphasis on the unity of their organization and nature, and held that there was a unified arrangement, agreement and mutual support among the various insurrection forces. Its leaders, without exception, are members of the Church of Heaven and Earth. The article examines "the change of Jiading" and the relevant historical facts of its leader, Zhou the Beginning of Spring, and tries to correct the former statement, and tries to ask whether there was in fact a "unified Shanghai knife club" that included all the forces and formed the overall layout in history.
【作者單位】： 上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院歷史研究所;
【分類號(hào)】：K254.42

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭緒印;評(píng)東南社會(huì)變遷與上海小刀會(huì)起義[J];學(xué)術(shù)月刊;2005年07期

2 朱從兵;;上海小刀會(huì)起義敗亡真相初探——兼議上海小刀會(huì)起義最后階段與太平天國(guó)的關(guān)系[J];廣西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年06期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張彬;上海英租界巡捕房及其制度研究（1854-1863）[D];華東政法大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 楊曉童;人生軌跡與宦海沉�。簵罘怀醪窖芯縖D];寧波大學(xué);2010年

2 張瑜;方詩(shī)銘史學(xué)研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2277873