【摘要】：正有一種意見認(rèn)為,《清帝退位詔書》授權(quán)袁世凱組織共和政府,以"禪讓"方式實(shí)現(xiàn)了"主權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)移",民國(guó)主權(quán)的合法性由此得以實(shí)現(xiàn);由于清帝擁有"天下共主"地位,詔書的頒布使中華帝國(guó)得以避免同期奧匈帝國(guó)似的分裂命運(yùn),促成了"五族共和",因而退位詔書實(shí)乃建國(guó)綱領(lǐng),堪比《臨時(shí)約法》。作者認(rèn)為,這種意見錯(cuò)漏甚多,須予駁難。作者論證,中華民國(guó)是革命建國(guó)而非前朝皇帝授權(quán)變
[Abstract]:There is a view that the abdication of the Qing Emperor authorized Yuan Shikai to organize the Republican government and to realize the "sovereignty transfer" in the form of "Zen concession", thereby realizing the legitimacy of the sovereignty of the Republic of China; since the Qing Emperor had the status of "the common master of the world", The promulgation of the imperial edict made it possible for the Chinese Empire to avoid the splittist fate of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in the same period, thus promoting the "Five-Nation Republic", thus abdicating the imperial edict was actually the creed of the founding of the people's Republic, comparable to the Provisional Treaty Law. In the author's opinion, there are many mistakes and omissions, which must be refuted. The author argues that the Republic of China was founded by revolution and not by the authorization of the previous emperor.
【分類號(hào)】：D691
，

本文編號(hào)：2264138