近代淮北地區(qū)流民問(wèn)題研究(1840-1937)
[Abstract]:Displaced people are one of the contents of the study of historical population geography. In modern times, Huaibei region frequent natural disasters, the social environment is bad, the phenomenon of displaced people is extremely prominent. At present, the phenomenon of displaced people in Huaibei area is still lack of special and systematic discussion in academic circles. The existing research results mainly focus on the causes, but the scale, direction and influence are still relatively weak, and the study of historical geography has not been carried out. Therefore, this paper takes the displaced people in Huaibei area as the research object, based on the local natural environment and social environment, discusses the forming factors, the scale, the direction and the social influence of the Huai Bei displaced people systematically, and forms some understanding of their own. The content of this paper is divided into the following five parts: first, the causes of the displaced people in Huaibei area in modern times. Combined with the introduction part of the description of the natural geographical environment in Huaibei area, this paper thinks that the disaster prone geographical environment in Huaibei area and the long-term impact of the Yellow River lead to the fragile ecological environment and frequent natural disasters in Huaibei region. It has become the main cause of Huaibei displaced people, and the bad social environment under the influence of natural disasters, such as population pressure, prominent bandits and serious donations, are also the driving force of the phenomenon of displaced people. Second, the scale and gender-age structure of Huaibei displaced people in modern times. Based on the literature records and the statistical data of peasants leaving villages in the period of the Republic of China, the author finds that the scale of displaced people after the Huaibei disaster is very serious, and the severity of natural disasters determines the size of the previous displaced people. In terms of sex R% and age structure, Huaibei displaced people are mainly young and male, which is due to the limitations of their own conditions and the choice of social needs. Third, the flow and characteristics of modern Huaibei displaced people. Based on the analysis of the records of modern newspapers and magazines and other documents, this paper holds that the regional flow direction of the displaced people in Upper Huaibei reflects the strong selectivity of the regional flow direction, and the south of the Yangtze River and the neighboring provinces are the main flowing regions. In the career direction, mainly concentrated in work, begging, as soldiers and bandits several aspects. On this basis, further explain its space, time flow characteristics and causes. Fourth, the influence of displaced people on local social changes. Based on the characteristics of sex, age structure and flow of displaced people, this part probes into the influence of displaced people on the economy, regional image, hometown environment, population quality and the industrial and commercial, agricultural development and social security of the displaced people. It is considered that the adverse effect on outflow land is main, but it plays an objective role in promoting the modernization of outflow land. Conclusion. Through the study of the problem of the displaced people in Huaibei in modern times, the author thinks that there is a close relationship between the environment, the phenomenon of displaced people and the development of local society. The occurrence of the phenomenon of the displaced people in Huaibei is the product of the local special natural and social environment. From the point of view of dealing with the environmental challenges, it is a survival choice to choose to leave one's hometown, but from the angle of local social development, it is not conducive to the local social development. It is not suitable for long-term adoption.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:陜西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:K25
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 孫如琦;西漢流民問(wèn)題初探[J];青海社會(huì)科學(xué);1986年04期
2 余謙;兩漢流民問(wèn)題探微[J];江西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1994年03期
3 尹虹;16世紀(jì)和17世紀(jì)前期英國(guó)的流民問(wèn)題[J];世界歷史;2001年04期
4 鄭傳斌,蘇新留;明代河南流民問(wèn)題與社會(huì)控制[J];史學(xué)月刊;2002年06期
5 孫如琦;東漢的流民和豪族[J];浙江學(xué)刊;1993年03期
6 劉勝;;淺析民國(guó)時(shí)期流民與城市化關(guān)系[J];武漢職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期
7 馬曉瓊;;東晉南朝流民及其政治影響[J];樂(lè)山師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期
8 熊家利;;流民問(wèn)題與中西封建經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1986年01期
9 熊家利;;流民問(wèn)題與中西封建經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展[J];湖南師范大學(xué)教育科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1986年01期
10 許輝 ,方亞光;西晉末年長(zhǎng)江中游流民暴動(dòng)的原因及其性質(zhì)[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1987年03期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條
1 李麗峰;;近十年中國(guó)近代鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)流動(dòng)研究綜述[A];華北鄉(xiāng)村史學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2001年
2 王永平;徐成;;近六十年來(lái)有關(guān)南朝襄陽(yáng)地區(qū)武力豪族研究述評(píng)[A];建國(guó)六十年來(lái)六朝史研究的回顧與展望學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2009年
3 金裕哲;;韓國(guó)的魏晉南北朝史研究[A];魏晉南北朝史研究:回顧與探索——中國(guó)魏晉南北朝史學(xué)會(huì)第九屆年會(huì)論文集[C];2007年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條
1 中山大學(xué)在讀歷史學(xué)博士 謝小強(qiáng);城市冷漠:政府冷漠的必然[N];東莞日?qǐng)?bào);2011年
2 何海燕;晚清人口問(wèn)題與對(duì)策略論[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2007年
3 茅家琦;解剖歷史上的社會(huì)難題[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2001年
4 本報(bào)駐京記者 馬克;收容:修正“辦法”,還是徹底廢除?[N];南方周末;2003年
5 本報(bào)記者 梁堅(jiān)義 原子;培育新農(nóng)民是建設(shè)新農(nóng)村的根本措施[N];黃石日?qǐng)?bào);2006年
6 江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué) 方寶璋;民惟邦本 本固邦寧[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2008年
7 南開(kāi)大學(xué) 江沛;歷史與現(xiàn)實(shí)雙重觀照下的中國(guó)農(nóng)村[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院院報(bào);2004年
8 王先明;開(kāi)展二十世紀(jì)的中國(guó)鄉(xiāng)村史研究[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2000年
9 史訊;“中國(guó)農(nóng)村問(wèn)題的歷史積淀及現(xiàn)代趨向”學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)簡(jiǎn)述[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2004年
10 李磊;社會(huì)與國(guó)家:漢唐史研究的新視野[N];中華讀書(shū)報(bào);2004年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 趙玉田;災(zāi)荒、生態(tài)環(huán)境與明代北方社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)開(kāi)發(fā)[D];東北師范大學(xué);2003年
2 袁文偉;民國(guó)時(shí)期西北土匪問(wèn)題研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2009年
3 何曉堅(jiān);農(nóng)民工待遇問(wèn)題的歷史考察[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 王艷菊;近代淮北地區(qū)流民問(wèn)題研究(1840-1937)[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2011年
2 熊家武;上海流民研究(1937-1949)[D];上海師范大學(xué);2011年
3 張燕;20世紀(jì)二三十年代華北農(nóng)民離村問(wèn)題[D];山西大學(xué);2011年
4 段有成;宋代流民問(wèn)題研究[D];西北師范大學(xué);2004年
5 沈鵬;明朝前中期流民問(wèn)題研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2011年
6 顏培華;清代黃淮平原東部流民問(wèn)題的歷史地理研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2010年
7 王艷;明代山東流民問(wèn)題述論[D];南京師范大學(xué);2011年
8 王鵬;民國(guó)初期山東流民問(wèn)題研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2011年
9 任馥瑛;晚清內(nèi)蒙古地區(qū)流民問(wèn)題研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2004年
10 柳晶;民國(guó)時(shí)期河北地區(qū)流民問(wèn)題研究[D];天津師范大學(xué);2012年
,本文編號(hào):2238994
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2238994.html