【摘要】： 新政協(xié)籌備發(fā)端于1948年4月30日中共的“五一號(hào)召”。當(dāng)時(shí),民盟被解散,中間路線宣告破產(chǎn),民革的成立和民盟一屆三中全會(huì)的召開(kāi),標(biāo)志著中間黨派拋棄了第三條道路。其間,中間黨派業(yè)已展開(kāi)了對(duì)中間路線的批判。并相繼對(duì)中共的“五一號(hào)召”表示了響應(yīng)。不過(guò),雖然中間黨派在香港就新政協(xié)運(yùn)動(dòng)的討論曾經(jīng)達(dá)成了初步共識(shí),但在新政協(xié)究竟應(yīng)該遵循一條什么樣的路線,特別是對(duì)于新政協(xié)是由中共、民革、民盟三黨聯(lián)合召開(kāi),還是由中共一黨召集問(wèn)題上,仍抱有懷疑態(tài)度。 然而,隨著中共力量的迅速壯大,和在戰(zhàn)場(chǎng)上的決定性勝利,中間黨派逐步接受現(xiàn)實(shí),承認(rèn)了中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位。這樣,當(dāng)新政協(xié)運(yùn)動(dòng)進(jìn)入實(shí)質(zhì)性階段時(shí),他們的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人陸續(xù)進(jìn)入解放區(qū),與中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨進(jìn)行協(xié)商,并于1948年11月25日,達(dá)成《關(guān)于召開(kāi)新的政治協(xié)商會(huì)議諸問(wèn)題》的協(xié)議�！蛾P(guān)于召開(kāi)新的政治協(xié)商會(huì)議諸問(wèn)題》協(xié)議是新政協(xié)籌備取得階段性成功的標(biāo)志,而1949年初中國(guó)國(guó)民黨革命委員會(huì)、中國(guó)民主同盟、中國(guó)民主建國(guó)會(huì)、中國(guó)民主促進(jìn)會(huì)、中國(guó)農(nóng)工民主黨、中國(guó)人民救國(guó)會(huì)、三民主義同志聯(lián)合會(huì)、中國(guó)國(guó)民黨民主促進(jìn)會(huì)、中國(guó)致公黨、九三學(xué)社、臺(tái)灣民主自治同盟等11個(gè)黨派的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人聯(lián)名發(fā)表的《對(duì)時(shí)局意見(jiàn)》,則明確表示接受中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo),從而為新中國(guó)政權(quán)的誕生奠定了基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:New CPPCC preparations for the beginning of April 30, 1948, the CPC's "May Day call." At that time, the League was dissolved, the middle line declared bankrupt, the founding of the Revolutionary Revolution and the convening of the third Plenary session of the first Central Committee of the Democratic League marked the third path abandoned by the centrist party. In the meantime, the middle parties have already criticized the middle line. And one after another to the Communist Party of China's "May Day call" expressed response. However, although the centrist parties have reached a preliminary consensus on the discussion of the new CPPCC movement in Hong Kong, what kind of line should the new CPPCC follow, especially when the CPPCC is jointly convened by the Chinese Communist Party, the Revolutionary Committee of the people's Republic of China, and the Democratic League of China? There is still scepticism about whether or not the Communist Party calls for a single party. However, with the rapid growth of the CPC's power and decisive victory in the battlefield, the centrist party gradually accepted the reality and recognized the leadership of the CPC. Thus, as the new CPPCC movement entered its substantive phase, their leaders successively entered the liberated areas for consultations with the Communist Party of China, and on November 25, 1948, The agreement on the convening of a new political consultative conference is a symbol of the success of the preparations for the new CPPCC, and the revolutionary committee of the Chinese Kuomintang in early 1949. China Democratic League, China Democratic Foundation, China Democratic Promotion Association, China Peasants and Workers Democratic Party, Chinese people's Salvation Association, Federation of comrades of the three people's principles, Democratic Promotion Association of the Chinese Kuomintang, China Zhigong Party, Jiusan Society, "opinions on the current situation", published jointly by the leaders of 11 political parties such as the Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League, clearly expressed acceptance of the leadership of the Communist Party of China, thus laying the foundation for the birth of the new Chinese regime.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：K266

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林祥庚;民主黨派與人民政協(xié)的創(chuàng)建[J];黨史研究與教學(xué);1998年05期

2 林芳;;“五一”口號(hào)與共產(chǎn)黨領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的多黨合作制度的確立[J];湖北省社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

3 李春生;試論解放戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)后期新政協(xié)運(yùn)動(dòng)的歷史特點(diǎn)[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1995年06期

4 宋梅英;;對(duì)解放戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)后期新政協(xié)運(yùn)動(dòng)歷史地位的探討[J];理論探討;2008年03期

5 邵雍;;共產(chǎn)黨多黨合作民主執(zhí)政的設(shè)計(jì)與開(kāi)端[J];上海市社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

6 黃福壽;;從“五一口號(hào)”到新政協(xié)的協(xié)商建國(guó)——1946～1949年間中國(guó)政黨關(guān)系演變邏輯[J];上海市社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

7 劉占強(qiáng);唐蓮英;;論“五一口號(hào)”與新中國(guó)多黨合作制度[J];上海市社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

8 邵雍;;“五一口號(hào)”與多黨合作和政治協(xié)商制度的初建[J];上海市社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

9 李曉紅;民主黨派與新政協(xié)會(huì)議[J];西江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1999年04期

10 裘仁根;;民主黨派與新政協(xié)運(yùn)動(dòng)[J];溫州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1989年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2193804