晚清國人對政體問題的認識
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-19 10:54
【摘要】：鴉片戰(zhàn)爭前后少數(shù)國人對西方的議會、選舉、總統(tǒng)等制度做了初步的介紹和較高的評價。洋務(wù)運動時期國人對列強政體有進一步認識,此時期西方的議院已經(jīng)是常常提到的概念。早期改良派認為西方列強的富國之本在于開設(shè)議院。他們對西方議會的認識還是初步的,尚未把它視為立法機關(guān),談不上君主立憲思想。 維新思想家在維新變法時期已經(jīng)提出君主立憲思想,明確提出要“開國會定憲法”,但康梁在百日維新期間的建言與之前的言論并不一致,這是因為由于對政體的認識落實到實踐層面,為應(yīng)對現(xiàn)實所做的變通。 清末新政初期,國人對政體的認識大體分為立憲、共和及守舊三派。此一期,統(tǒng)治者對君主專制政體自身有所改良,革命派和立憲派論戰(zhàn)不休,雙方實質(zhì)上還沒有共同的前提。預(yù)備立憲時期,國人對政體的認識已經(jīng)進入實踐階段,各派認識趨于成熟。統(tǒng)治者內(nèi)部激烈爭論,立憲派和革命派也進行論戰(zhàn)。但這一期對政體的改革已關(guān)涉統(tǒng)治者根本利益,統(tǒng)治者為自己利益打算引起各方不滿。晚清政體轉(zhuǎn)型的失敗的根本原因是國家利益和王朝利益的沖突。 統(tǒng)而言之,具體制度變革逼出對整體制度的要求。早期的中國人逐漸認識到,以議會制度為特點的西方國家政體是西方國家富強的根本原因。在認識層面晚清國人基于國家本位對西方立憲政體賦予工具理性意義,以便使國家臻于富強文明,這一點改良思想家、維新思想家和立憲派、革命派都是相通的。
[Abstract]:Before and after the Opium War, a small number of Chinese made a preliminary introduction and high evaluation to the western parliamentary, election, president and other systems. During the Westernization Movement, Chinese people had a better understanding of the great powers. The early reformists believed that the rich countries of the Western powers were based on the opening of parliaments. Their understanding of Western parliaments is still preliminary, not as a legislature, not as constitutional monarchy. During the reform period, the reform thinkers put forward the idea of constitutional monarchy and explicitly proposed to "establish the Constitution of the National Assembly." however, Kang Liang's advice during the hundred days of reform was not consistent with his previous remarks. This is because the understanding of the regime to the practical level, to adapt to reality. At the beginning of the New deal in the late Qing Dynasty, Chinese people's understanding of the polity was divided into three groups: constitutionalism, republicanism and conservatism. In this issue, the rulers improved the autocratic monarchy, and the revolutionaries and constitutionalists argued endlessly, and the two sides had no common premise in essence. In the preparatory constitutional period, Chinese people's understanding of the regime has entered a practical stage, the understanding of various parties tend to mature. There were fierce debates within the rulers, and the constitutionalists and revolutionaries also debated. But this reform of the regime has a bearing on the fundamental interests of the rulers, the rulers intend to cause dissatisfaction for their own interests. The fundamental reason for the failure of the regime transformation in the late Qing Dynasty was the conflict between the national interest and the dynastic interest. On the whole, the specific institutional change forces the requirement to the whole system. The early Chinese gradually realized that the western political system characterized by the parliamentary system was the fundamental reason for the prosperity and strength of the western countries. On the cognitive level, the Chinese people in the late Qing Dynasty endowed the western constitutionalism with the instrumental rational meaning based on the national standard, in order to make the country become rich and strong civilization. This point is that the reformist thinkers, the reform thinkers, the constitutionalists and the revolutionaries are all interlinked.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：K252;D691
本文編號：2191454
[Abstract]:Before and after the Opium War, a small number of Chinese made a preliminary introduction and high evaluation to the western parliamentary, election, president and other systems. During the Westernization Movement, Chinese people had a better understanding of the great powers. The early reformists believed that the rich countries of the Western powers were based on the opening of parliaments. Their understanding of Western parliaments is still preliminary, not as a legislature, not as constitutional monarchy. During the reform period, the reform thinkers put forward the idea of constitutional monarchy and explicitly proposed to "establish the Constitution of the National Assembly." however, Kang Liang's advice during the hundred days of reform was not consistent with his previous remarks. This is because the understanding of the regime to the practical level, to adapt to reality. At the beginning of the New deal in the late Qing Dynasty, Chinese people's understanding of the polity was divided into three groups: constitutionalism, republicanism and conservatism. In this issue, the rulers improved the autocratic monarchy, and the revolutionaries and constitutionalists argued endlessly, and the two sides had no common premise in essence. In the preparatory constitutional period, Chinese people's understanding of the regime has entered a practical stage, the understanding of various parties tend to mature. There were fierce debates within the rulers, and the constitutionalists and revolutionaries also debated. But this reform of the regime has a bearing on the fundamental interests of the rulers, the rulers intend to cause dissatisfaction for their own interests. The fundamental reason for the failure of the regime transformation in the late Qing Dynasty was the conflict between the national interest and the dynastic interest. On the whole, the specific institutional change forces the requirement to the whole system. The early Chinese gradually realized that the western political system characterized by the parliamentary system was the fundamental reason for the prosperity and strength of the western countries. On the cognitive level, the Chinese people in the late Qing Dynasty endowed the western constitutionalism with the instrumental rational meaning based on the national standard, in order to make the country become rich and strong civilization. This point is that the reformist thinkers, the reform thinkers, the constitutionalists and the revolutionaries are all interlinked.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：K252;D691
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王開璽;清統(tǒng)治集團的君主立憲論與晚清政局[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報;1990年05期
2 蕭致治;從《四洲志》的編譯看林則徐眼中的世界[J];福建論壇(文史哲版);1999年04期
3 陳鳳鳴;康有為戊戌條陳匯錄——故宮藏清光緒二十四年內(nèi)府抄本《杰士上書匯錄》簡介[J];故宮博物院院刊;1981年01期
4 楊紅偉;祝元梅;;制度變遷與路徑選擇:再論張謇君主立憲思想[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2008年05期
5 鄧麗蘭;中國知識界對議會政治的認知與民國政制的演變[J];河北學(xué)刊;2004年05期
6 雷俊;;官僚立憲派與清末政爭[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1992年04期
7 陳旭麓;戊戌時期維新派的社會觀——群學(xué)[J];近代史研究;1984年02期
8 耿云志;從革命黨與立憲派的論戰(zhàn)看雙方民主思想的準備[J];近代史研究;2001年06期
9 孔祥吉;;《戊戌奏稿》的改篡及其原因[J];晉陽學(xué)刊;1982年02期
10 房德鄰;;維新派政治綱領(lǐng)的演變[J];歷史研究;1989年06期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條
1 余音;[N];中國檔案報;2010年
，本文編號：2191454
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2191454.html
