【摘要】：一、《盛京時(shí)報(bào)》概況 《盛京時(shí)報(bào)》的創(chuàng)刊者中島真雄在日本滿洲部隊(duì)總參謀長兒玉源和奉天總領(lǐng)事荻原守一的支持下,于1906年10月18日奉天(今沈陽)創(chuàng)辦了日本在中國的一份中文報(bào)紙。作為日本侵華的言論機(jī)關(guān),它以隱秘的方式輔助日本武裝侵華。但對于當(dāng)時(shí)較為閉塞的東北來說,《盛京時(shí)報(bào)》也給國人的頭腦注入某些新鮮養(yǎng)分。而1931年九一八事變成為《盛京時(shí)報(bào)》發(fā)展史上的一個(gè)重要轉(zhuǎn)折點(diǎn)。并于1945年日本戰(zhàn)敗投降后隨即�？�,結(jié)束了其三十九年的辦報(bào)歷程。 二、對災(zāi)荒救濟(jì)的報(bào)道 以《盛京時(shí)報(bào)》為媒介把目光聚焦在東北這塊土地上,便不難發(fā)現(xiàn)1906—1931年的東北地區(qū)幾乎每年都遭受不同程度的災(zāi)荒。而且災(zāi)荒種類頗多,有水災(zāi)、旱災(zāi)、瘟疫、火災(zāi)、雹災(zāi)、風(fēng)災(zāi)和蝗災(zāi)等。但以水災(zāi)、旱災(zāi)和疫災(zāi)這三種災(zāi)荒為主,因?yàn)樗鼈儽l(fā)次數(shù)多、波及地區(qū)廣、持續(xù)時(shí)間長、影響程度重。而這期間具有代表性災(zāi)荒救濟(jì)的報(bào)道要?dú)w為——1930年水災(zāi)救濟(jì)、1926年旱災(zāi)救濟(jì)、1911年疫災(zāi)救濟(jì)、1911年火災(zāi)救濟(jì)。 三、災(zāi)荒救濟(jì)報(bào)道的特點(diǎn) 《盛京時(shí)報(bào)》消息來源主要以報(bào)道、評論為主。這兩種方式對災(zāi)荒救濟(jì)進(jìn)行報(bào)道時(shí)又各顯現(xiàn)出了它們的優(yōu)勢及特點(diǎn)。從《盛京時(shí)報(bào)》對災(zāi)荒救濟(jì)消息報(bào)道的特點(diǎn)來看,則可分為報(bào)道內(nèi)容的特點(diǎn)及報(bào)道形式的特點(diǎn)。而從災(zāi)荒救濟(jì)評論的特點(diǎn)來看,則可將其評論放眼為廣度及深度的層次。四、《盛京時(shí)報(bào)》在災(zāi)荒救濟(jì)中的作用 《盛京時(shí)報(bào)》作為東北最具影響力的大眾傳媒工具,在報(bào)道災(zāi)荒救濟(jì)方面發(fā)揮了其強(qiáng)大的輿論力量,對減輕災(zāi)荒損失、打擊賑災(zāi)不法行為、完備救災(zāi)機(jī)制方面都起到了積極的作用。但是不容忽視的是,以日本政府為后盾的《盛京時(shí)報(bào)》在新聞報(bào)道時(shí),必然會多多少少的帶有政治性色彩。而這也就決定了它在災(zāi)荒救濟(jì)報(bào)道中必然帶有的消極作用。
[Abstract]:First, the general situation of the "Shengjing Times," the founder of the "Shengjing Times," with the support of Japan's Chief of General staff of Manchuria, Yu-yuyuan, and Consul General of Fengtian, Shinichi, Fengtian (now Shenyang) founded a Chinese newspaper in China on October 18, 1906. As a speech organ of Japanese aggression against China, it assisted Japanese armed aggression against China in a secret way. But for the then more closed northeast, Shengjing Times also injected some fresh nutrients into the minds of Chinese people. The September 18 th incident in 1931 became an important turning point in the history of the Shengjing Times. It stopped publication immediately after Japan's defeat and surrender in 1945, ending its 39-year history of running newspapers. Second, the report of famine relief takes Shengjing Times as a medium to focus on the land of Northeast China, and it is not difficult to find that the Northeast region suffered almost every year from 1906-1931 to different degrees of famine. There are many kinds of disasters, such as flood, drought, plague, fire, hail, wind and locusts. But the three kinds of famine are flood, drought and epidemic, because of their large number of outbreaks, extensive areas, long duration and heavy impact. During this period, the representative relief of famine is classified as flood relief in 1930, drought relief in 1926, epidemic disaster relief in 1911 and fire relief in 1911. Third, the characteristics of famine relief reports are mainly reports and comments. These two methods have shown their advantages and characteristics when they report on the relief of famine. Judging from the characteristics of the report on the relief news of famine in Shengjing Times, it can be divided into the characteristics of the contents of the report and the characteristics of the form of the report. Judging from the characteristics of the critique of famine relief, it can be viewed as the level of breadth and depth. Fourthly, the role of the "Shengjing Times" in the relief of famine, as the most influential mass media tool in the Northeast, has exerted its powerful public opinion in reporting on the relief of famine and has played a great role in alleviating the losses of the famine. Cracking down on illegal acts of disaster relief and perfecting disaster relief mechanisms have all played an active role. But it can not be ignored that the Shengjing Times, backed by the Japanese government, is bound to be more or less political in its news coverage. And this also decided that it must have the negative effect in the famine relief report.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K25

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 齊輝;;《盛京時(shí)報(bào)》與九一八事變[J];民國檔案;2009年03期

2 王方中;1931年江淮大水災(zāi)及其后果[J];近代史研究;1990年01期

3 李文海;中國近代災(zāi)荒與社會生活[J];近代史研究;1990年05期

4 齊輝;林曉嬋;;論“九·一八”事變前后《盛京時(shí)報(bào)》的輿論宣傳與勢力擴(kuò)張[J];遼寧大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2009年05期

5 劉仰東;災(zāi)荒:考察近代中國社會的另一個(gè)視角[J];清史研究;1995年02期

6 吳德華;試論民國時(shí)期的災(zāi)荒[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);1992年03期

7 李德民，，周世春;論陜西近代旱荒的影響及成因[J];西北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1994年03期

8 李文海;論近代中國災(zāi)荒史研究[J];中國人民大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1988年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張敏;《盛京時(shí)報(bào)》與清末憲政（1906——1911）[D];蘇州大學(xué);2003年

2 葛鳳;《大公報(bào)》與近代災(zāi)荒救濟(jì)[D];山東師范大學(xué);2007年

3 蔡虹;《申報(bào)》與晚清災(zāi)荒救濟(jì)[D];山東師范大學(xué);2007年

4 王璐;《盛京時(shí)報(bào)》研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2008年

本文編號：2162329