發(fā)布時間：2018-06-26 05:27

  本文選題：社會主義論戰(zhàn) + 內(nèi)地��； 參考：《齊魯學(xué)刊》2015年06期

【摘要】：張東蓀一篇不到600字的時評何以會引發(fā)社會主義論戰(zhàn)?之前的內(nèi)地演講所提示的地域與認(rèn)同因素在論戰(zhàn)中扮演著怎樣的角色?進而言之,該論戰(zhàn)的思想論爭層面與社會、心態(tài)與認(rèn)同層面的關(guān)系如何?通過對論戰(zhàn)參與者社會位置、認(rèn)同與言說的分析,上述問題當(dāng)可得一合理解答。論戰(zhàn)中思想論爭的關(guān)鍵在于外來主義與中國國情的關(guān)系問題.張東蓀以湖南與羅素為背景的評論,觸發(fā)了離鄉(xiāng)新知識分子內(nèi)地認(rèn)同與"世界民"心態(tài)和形象之間的矛盾,導(dǎo)致其發(fā)言以爭奪代表內(nèi)地的資格,并激辯中國在世界中位置與作用為主題。這一爭論在一戰(zhàn)后西方日益分裂的大背景下,提示著思想權(quán)勢從美國向新俄的轉(zhuǎn)移。既存研究所強調(diào)的論戰(zhàn)中馬克思主義者對非馬克思主義者的勝利,更多體現(xiàn)在心態(tài)與認(rèn)同層面,而非思想層面。
[Abstract]:Why does Zhang Dongsun's commentary in less than 600 words lead to a debate on socialism? What role does the region and identity factor play in the debate? Furthermore, what is the relationship between the debate level and the society, the mentality and the identity level? By analyzing the social position, identity and speech of the participants in the debate, the above questions can be reasonably answered. The key to ideological debate in the debate lies in the relationship between extranationism and China's national conditions. Zhang Dongsun's comments with Hunan and Russell as the background triggered a contradiction between the mainland identity of the new intellectuals who left home and the mentality and image of the "world people," leading him to speak in order to compete for qualifications to represent the mainland. And debate China's position and role in the world as the theme. This argument, in the context of the growing division of the West after World War I, suggests the shift of ideological power from the United States to the new Russia. The victory of Marxists over non-Marxists in the debate emphasized by the existential Research Institute is more embodied in the level of mentality and identity than in the level of thought.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學(xué)歷史學(xué)院;
【基金】：中國人民大學(xué)科學(xué)研究基金(中央高校基本科研業(yè)務(wù)費專項資金資助)項目“晚清士人天下觀研究”(15XNB036)
【分類號】：K26
，

本文編號：2069316