發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-31 16:20

  本文選題：“廣田三原則” + 大陸政策　； 參考：《東北師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：“廣田三原則”在日本侵華史上占有重要地位,是明治以來日本歷屆政府對(duì)華政策的延續(xù)。本文運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)資料分析的方法,在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上,解析“廣田三原則”。內(nèi)容涉及“三原則”提出的過程、中日雙方的交涉以及“三原則”的實(shí)質(zhì)等問題。此外,本文還將對(duì)中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨對(duì)“三原則”的反應(yīng)作出獨(dú)到的梳理和分析。本論文共三部分來評(píng)析“廣田三原則”。 第一部分主要通過對(duì)日本明治年間的大陸政策、1934年發(fā)表的“天羽聲明”及作為口號(hào)的“和協(xié)外交”之間的延續(xù)性的分析,指出“三原則”的提出并非偶然。它是日本政客順應(yīng)日本國(guó)內(nèi)各界對(duì)華訴求的結(jié)果。無論20世紀(jì)30年代日本對(duì)中國(guó)提出何種“友善”的口號(hào),其實(shí)質(zhì)和最終目的都是一致的。 第二部分對(duì)中國(guó)國(guó)民政府當(dāng)局與日本圍繞“廣田三原則”展開的交涉進(jìn)行論述,同時(shí),分析了中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨對(duì)“三原則”的反應(yīng)。國(guó)民政府的對(duì)日交涉大致經(jīng)歷了三個(gè)階段,交涉的問題分別是:“王崇惠三原則”與“廣田三原則”的關(guān)系(主要在中國(guó)駐日大使蔣作賓與日本外相廣田弘毅之間進(jìn)行)、所謂的華北“自治運(yùn)動(dòng)”與“廣田三原則”的關(guān)系、國(guó)民政府壓制反日情緒與“廣田三原則”的關(guān)系(主要在國(guó)民政府外交部長(zhǎng)張群與日本駐華大使川越茂之間進(jìn)行)。 國(guó)民政府在對(duì)日交涉的過程中態(tài)度出現(xiàn)了變化,由最初的妥協(xié)退讓到逐漸強(qiáng)硬、準(zhǔn)備抗日。同時(shí),在這一部分中也增加了前人在研究“廣田三原則”過程中沒有提及的中共的反應(yīng),分析了中共的處境決定了對(duì)“三原則”反應(yīng)的局限性。 第三部分分析了“廣田三原則”的具體內(nèi)容,梳理了中日雙方在“三原則”交涉過程中的態(tài)度和立場(chǎng),指出:“三原則”是日本獨(dú)霸中國(guó)的構(gòu)想的外在表現(xiàn)。 最后,本論文得出結(jié)論:“廣田三原則”是明治以來日本歷屆政府對(duì)華政策的延續(xù)、是日本侵占東北后對(duì)華政策的新調(diào)整,內(nèi)容有一定的欺騙性,形式的轉(zhuǎn)換掩蓋不了實(shí)質(zhì)。
[Abstract]:The "three principles of Hiroshima" occupies an important position in the history of Japanese aggression against China and is a continuation of the Japanese government's policy towards China since Meiji. On the basis of previous studies, this paper analyzes the three principles of Guangda by using the method of literature analysis. The content involves the process of putting forward the three principles, the negotiation between China and Japan, and the essence of the three principles. In addition, this paper will analyze the Communist Party of China's response to the three principles. This thesis consists of three parts to comment on the three principles of Guangda. The first part points out that the "three principles" are not accidental through the analysis of the policy of the Meiji period in Japan, the "Tianyu Declaration" issued in 1934, and the continuity of "Harmony diplomacy" as a slogan. It is the result of Japanese politicians' compliance with Japan's domestic demands for China. No matter what kind of "friendly" slogan Japan put forward to China in the 1930s, its essence and ultimate aim were the same. The second part discusses the negotiation between the Chinese National Government and Japan around the "three principles of Guangda", and analyzes the reaction of the Communist Party of China to the "three principles". The National Government's representations to Japan have generally gone through three stages. The issues of negotiation are: the relationship between the "three principles of Wang Chonghui" and the "three principles of Hiroda" (mainly between Chinese Ambassador to Japan Jiang Zuobin and Japanese Foreign Minister Hiroshi Hiroshi), the so-called "autonomous movement" in North China and "Hiroda" The relationship between the three principles, The relationship between the suppression of anti-Japanese sentiment by the national government and the "three principles of Hiroda" (mainly between Zhang Qun, the foreign minister of the National Government, and Kawamoto, the Japanese ambassador to China). In the process of negotiation with Japan, the national government changed its attitude, from the initial compromise to the gradual hardline, ready to resist Japan. At the same time, in this part, the reaction of the Chinese Communist Party which was not mentioned in the study of the "three principles of Guangda" is added, and the limitation of the response to the "three principles" is determined by the situation of the Communist Party of China. The third part analyzes the concrete contents of "three principles of Hiroda", combs the attitude and position of China and Japan in the negotiation process of "three principles", and points out that "three principles" is the external manifestation of Japan's idea of dominating China. Finally, this paper draws a conclusion that the "three principles of Hiroshima" is a continuation of the successive Japanese governments' China policy since Meiji, and a new adjustment of Japan's policy towards China after Japan's occupation of Northeast China. The contents are deceptive, and the change of form cannot cover up the essence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：K265

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 彭敦文;中日“廣田三原則”交涉中的國(guó)民政府的外交策略[J];民國(guó)檔案;2001年03期

2 肖立輝;抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)期間的日本侵華政策綜述[J];日本問題研究;2000年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1960507