本文選題：“弛禁論” + 鴉片　； 參考：《東北師范大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：近代中國,開始于鴉片泛濫,結束于鴉片泛濫,鴉片問題作為一個嚴重的社會問題,深深的影響了近代中國的各個方面。道光年間,面對鴉片走私帶來的各種危害,清政府的各級士紳提出了諸多解決方案,“弛禁論”就是其中的一種。它以防止白銀外流為根本出發(fā)點,力圖通過“以貨易貨”的貿易方式扼制白銀的外流,力圖利用鴉片貿易合法化來增加政府的財政收入,力圖通過罌粟國產(chǎn)化抵制外國鴉片的進口,力圖通過緩禁的措施最終根治中國的煙毒,這種觀點符合了當時中國的歷史環(huán)境和社會條件,并一度得到了最高統(tǒng)治者的默認。但“弛禁論”本身難以克服的致命缺點以及飲鴆止渴般的措施,并不能為當時的傳統(tǒng)士大夫所接受,并隨著許乃濟的致仕而偃旗息鼓。 不過清代后期所實行的鴉片政策,卻幾乎與“弛禁論”者所提出的觀點相契合,這從某種程度上說明了這種觀點的時代性和實用性。本文正是通過分析“弛禁論”者所提出的各種觀點,揭示其錯誤的觀點,總結其在當時所起到的作用,以便我們更為客觀的研究“弛禁論”這一觀點。 本文主要分以下幾個部分對“弛禁論”做一相關的論述。 引言部分主要概括了本文的研究內容和研究現(xiàn)狀,并對相關文獻做了一個研究綜述。 第一部分論述了“弛禁論”產(chǎn)生的社會背景及其代表人物。 第二部分分析了“弛禁論”的主要觀點。 第三部分剖析了“弛禁論”的錯誤思想。 第四部分對“弛禁論”值得肯定的觀點進行了分析。 第五部分是結論,主要分析“弛禁論”的根本目的和他們與鴉片商之間的關系,并對道光皇帝罷免許乃濟進行了分析。
[Abstract]:In modern China, the Opium overflowed and ended in the Opium overflowing. The opium problem, as a serious social problem, deeply influenced all aspects of modern China. In the period of Daoguang, in the face of the various dangers brought by the opium smuggling, the gentry at all levels of the Qing government put forward a number of solutions. "The theory of relaxation" was one of them. In order to prevent the silver exodus as a fundamental starting point, it tries to choke out the exodus of silver through the "barter" trade mode and try to use the opium trade to legitimize the government's financial revenue, trying to resist the import of the foreign opium through the domestically produced opium poppy, and try to cure the Chinese tobacco poison through the slow prohibition measures. This view is consistent with the view. At that time, the historical environment and social conditions of China were defaults to the supreme ruler, but the fatal shortcomings of "the theory of relaxation" and the measures of drinking poison to quench thirst could not be accepted by the traditional scholar bureaucrats at that time.
However, the opium policy implemented in the late Qing Dynasty is almost consistent with the views proposed by the "relaxation theory". This explains to some extent the times and practicality of this view. This article is through the analysis of all kinds of views put forward by the "relaxation theory", reveals its mistake, and summarizes its role at the time. So that we can more objectively study the concept of "lifting the ban".
This article mainly discusses the theory of "lifting the ban" in the following sections.
The preface mainly summarizes the research contents and research status of this article, and makes a summary of relevant literature.
The first part discusses the social background and representative figures of the theory of "lifting the ban".
The second part analyzes the main points of the theory of "lifting the ban".
The third part analyzes the wrong idea of "lifting the ban".
The fourth part analyzes the affirmative viewpoints of the theory of "lifting the ban".
The fifth part is the conclusion, which mainly analyzes the fundamental purpose of the theory of "lifting the ban" and their relationship with opium traders.
【學位授予單位】：東北師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K253

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王開璽;鴉片戰(zhàn)爭前后清統(tǒng)治集團禁煙方針錯位略論[J];安徽史學;1998年02期

2 黃細嘉;《請嚴塞漏卮以培國本疏》作者異說考論[J];安徽史學;1999年03期

3 邢廣叢,王學紅;英國對華鴉片貿易的起因、擴展與衰落[J];安慶師院社會科學學報;1997年03期

4 呂秀蓮,劉艷秋;清朝的禁煙政策與鴉片貿易合法化問題述論[J];北方論叢;1998年02期

5 程希慶;近代中國社會的鴉片為什么屢禁不止[J];北京聯(lián)合大學學報;1998年03期

6 胡維革;論鴉片貿易合法化對近代中國社會的影響[J];東北師大學報;1988年03期

7 孔祥吉;;談近代史研究中人物評價問題[J];福建論壇(文史哲版);1987年01期

8 黃順力;傳統(tǒng)心態(tài)和鴉片戰(zhàn)爭[J];福建論壇(文史哲版);1990年04期

9 姚建龍;我國現(xiàn)行戒毒體系的反思與重構[J];青少年犯罪問題;2002年03期

10 黃健敏;鴉片戰(zhàn)爭前廣東學海堂學長關于鴉片問題的討論[J];廣東史志;2003年01期

，

本文編號：1924753