本文選題：保路風(fēng)潮 + 陳曉東��； 參考：《史學(xué)月刊》2014年07期

【摘要】：正清王朝的滅亡起于武昌起義,而武昌起義的成功又與保路風(fēng)潮密切相關(guān),保路事件無疑成了引發(fā)清政府統(tǒng)治危機(jī)的導(dǎo)火線。保路風(fēng)潮針對(duì)"干路收歸國(guó)有",本是鐵路修筑體制的改革,何以導(dǎo)致事件激化并引發(fā)統(tǒng)治危機(jī)?對(duì)此學(xué)界已有不少評(píng)析。以往多數(shù)學(xué)者將之歸結(jié)為清政府國(guó)有政策劫路奪款、借債喪權(quán),以致官逼民反。近年來觀點(diǎn)更為多元,有學(xué)者認(rèn)同國(guó)有方案,遺憾的是政府辦理不善(陳曉東:《清政府鐵路"干路國(guó)有政策"再評(píng)價(jià)》,《史學(xué)月刊》2008年第3期);
[Abstract]:The death of the Zheng Qing Dynasty originated from the Wuchang uprising, and the success of the Wuchang uprising was closely related to the wave of Baolu. In view of the "nationalization of the main roads" and the reform of the railway construction system, the wave of protecting roads led to the intensification of the incident and led to a crisis of domination. To this academic circle already had a lot of comment. In the past, most scholars attributed it to the Qing government's state-owned policy of robbing money, borrowing and losing power, so that officials forced the people into opposition. In recent years, the viewpoints are more diversified, some scholars agree with the state-owned plan, but unfortunately the government is not good at handling it (Chen Xiaodong: reevaluation of the Qing government railway "main road state-owned policy", the third issue of the monthly Journal of History, 2008);
【作者單位】： 南開大學(xué)歷史學(xué)院;
【基金】：南開大學(xué)博士生科研創(chuàng)新基金資助
【分類號(hào)】：K257

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳廷湘;;1911年清政府處理鐵路國(guó)有事件的失誤與失敗——以四川為中心的保路運(yùn)動(dòng)歷史再思[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

2 ;[J];;年期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：1913635