本文選題：“三三制” + 聯(lián)合政府　； 參考：《河南大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 抗日戰(zhàn)爭進入相持階段后,日軍對中國正面戰(zhàn)場停止了大規(guī)模的進攻,對國民政府進行了政治誘降,促使國民黨確立積極反共、消極抗日的方針,國民黨軍隊展開對中共領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的抗日根據(jù)地的進攻,同時,日軍也加緊了對抗日根據(jù)地的進攻。 為了打破國民黨軍和日軍的雙重軍事圍堵,中共除了領(lǐng)導(dǎo)抗日根據(jù)地的八路軍和新四軍等人民軍隊進行堅決反擊以外,還組織抗日根據(jù)地的廣大人民群眾進行根據(jù)地建設(shè),其中,政權(quán)建設(shè)成績顯著,主要體現(xiàn)在制定并執(zhí)行了“三三制”的執(zhí)政原則。1944年,國民黨軍在豫湘桂戰(zhàn)役中戰(zhàn)敗,丟掉了華北、華中和西南的大片國土,全國人民震動,紛紛表達對作戰(zhàn)不利的不滿。國人普遍認為:國民黨的腐敗不堪是造成作戰(zhàn)失敗的主要因素,要求國民黨結(jié)束一黨專政、改組國民政府。中共提出了自己的政治主張——建立一個包括各黨派和無黨派民主人士參加的聯(lián)合政府。主張一出,民主黨派和無黨派人士積極支持,國民黨內(nèi)的許多人也表示贊同,唯有蔣介石為首的強硬派不認同,聯(lián)合政府始終未建立。抗戰(zhàn)勝利后,中共實力上升,國民黨實力下降,全國人民希望國家和平統(tǒng)一,美蘇兩國也不愿意中國發(fā)生內(nèi)戰(zhàn)。 為了解決和平統(tǒng)一、重建國家的問題,在各方的不懈努力下,1946年1月,由國民黨、中共、民主同盟、青年黨和無黨派民主人士參加的政治協(xié)商會議在國民政府陪都重慶順利召開。會上,五方代表經(jīng)過反復(fù)協(xié)商,通過了改組政府、施政綱領(lǐng)、軍事、國民大會和憲法草案案五項決議案,構(gòu)建出具有中國特色的民主之路。遺憾的是,國民黨強硬派最終破壞了這一道路。這其中的歷史經(jīng)驗教訓(xùn)極為珍貴。
[Abstract]:After the War of Resistance against Japan entered the stage of confrontation, the Japanese troops stopped their large-scale attacks on the front battlefields of China and made political inducements to the national government, prompting the Kuomintang to establish a policy of active anti-Communist and negative anti-Japanese policies. The Kuomintang army launched an attack on the anti-Japanese base area led by the Communist Party, and the Japanese army stepped up its attack on the anti-Japanese base area. In order to break the double military siege between the Kuomintang and the Japanese, in addition to leading the people's armies such as the eighth Route Army and the New fourth Army in the anti-Japanese base areas to carry out resolute counter-attacks, the Chinese Communist Party also organized the broad masses of the people in the anti-Japanese base areas to carry out the construction of the base areas. Among them, the remarkable achievements in regime construction are mainly reflected in the formulation and implementation of the governing principle of the "three systems." in 1944, the Kuomintang army lost the battle of Henan, Hunan and Guangxi and lost a large part of the territory of North China, Central China and Southwest China, and the people of the whole country trembled. One after another expressed dissatisfaction with the unfavorable combat. It is widely believed that the corruption of the Kuomintang is the main factor causing the defeat of the war, and demands that the Kuomintang end the one-party dictatorship and reorganize the national government. The Communist Party has put forward its own political idea of establishing a coalition government that includes both partisan and non-partisan Democrats. As soon as the proposal was actively supported by the democratic parties and non-party figures, many in the KMT also agreed. Only the hardliners led by the Jiang Jieshi did not agree, and the coalition government was never established. After the victory of the War of Resistance against Japan, the strength of the Chinese Communist Party rose, the strength of the Kuomintang declined, and the people of the whole country hoped for the peaceful reunification of the country. In order to resolve the problem of peaceful reunification and the reconstruction of the country, with the unremitting efforts of all parties, in January 1946, the Kuomintang, the Communist Party of China, the Democratic League, Al-Shabaab and non-party Democrats participated in the political consultation meeting in Chongqing, the National Government reception smoothly held. At the meeting, the representatives of the five parties, after repeated consultations, passed five resolutions on the reorganization of the government, the policy agenda, the military, the National Assembly, and the draft constitution to build a democratic road with Chinese characteristics. Unfortunately, the Kuomintang hardliners finally sabotaged this road. The lessons of history are extremely valuable.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：K265

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉丹;論民主聯(lián)合政府的憲政意義[D];華中師范大學(xué);2012年

2 張林林;中國共產(chǎn)黨新民主主義革命時期的道德建設(shè)研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1889657