本文選題：新制 + 舊章��； 參考：《江西社會(huì)科學(xué)》2017年09期

【摘要】：民國(guó)初期,江蘇省在承接清末地方制度的基礎(chǔ)上,制定本省暫行縣市鄉(xiāng)制,以繼續(xù)推動(dòng)地方制度向前發(fā)展。然而,在袁世凱復(fù)辟帝制失敗之后,北洋政府同江蘇省就恢復(fù)暫行縣市鄉(xiāng)制一事產(chǎn)生齟齬。北洋政府堅(jiān)持制定新制,江蘇省則力主舊章,而雙方圍繞"新制"與"舊章"展開(kāi)的紛爭(zhēng),反映出北洋政府在應(yīng)對(duì)政治現(xiàn)代化進(jìn)程中,不僅沒(méi)有對(duì)地方制度進(jìn)行有效的整合與重塑,反而在同地方博弈過(guò)程中將本就脆弱的統(tǒng)治基礎(chǔ)消耗殆盡,而地方則在軍閥政治的裹挾下也難以真正推動(dòng)地方制度的現(xiàn)代化發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:In the early period of the Republic of China, Jiangsu Province, on the basis of accepting the local system in the late Qing Dynasty, formulated the temporary county and township system in the province in order to continue to promote the development of the local system. However, after the failure of Yuan Shikai's restoration monarchy, the Beiyang government and Jiangsu province had a discord on the restoration of the temporary county and township system. The Beiyang government insisted on making the new system, and the Jiangsu province was the old one. The dispute between the two sides of the "new system" and the "old chapter" reflects that the Beiyang government not only does not effectively integrate and reshape the local system in the process of political modernization, but consumes the fragile rule base in the process of playing the game with the local government, while the place is also difficult to be true under the coerce of the warlords politics. Promote the modernization of the local system.

【作者單位】： 安陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院馬克思主義學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：K258

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 ;憲法審議會(huì)之大搗亂 議員打成一團(tuán) 好一臺(tái)熱鬧戲[J];文史博覽;2009年08期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 尹桂芳;第一屆國(guó)會(huì)與地方制度加入憲法[D];天津師范大學(xué);2007年

2 朱卿;民國(guó)初年制憲中的地方制度問(wèn)題[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1871487