本文選題：全面抗戰(zhàn)時期 + 中國共產(chǎn)黨��； 參考：《西南大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 全面抗戰(zhàn)時期,中國共產(chǎn)黨、中國國民黨以及中國民主黨派(以下分別簡稱共產(chǎn)黨、國民黨、民主黨派)對抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的內(nèi)涵、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)歸屬與抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位保持及作用發(fā)揮等方面都有著各自的認(rèn)識。圍繞上述問題,文章主體部分分為四章。 第一章：共產(chǎn)黨對抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的認(rèn)識。本章系統(tǒng)闡述共產(chǎn)黨對“抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)”內(nèi)涵、抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)歸屬、保持抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位和發(fā)揮其作用等方面的認(rèn)識。共產(chǎn)黨認(rèn)為抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的內(nèi)涵是：具有歷史預(yù)見性的共產(chǎn)黨積極爭取并自覺擔(dān)負(fù)起,附屬于新民主主義革命的全面抗戰(zhàn)時期的時代背景賦予其從政治或組織等方面率領(lǐng)中國人民(主要包括工人、農(nóng)民及小資產(chǎn)階級,至于對大地主大資產(chǎn)階級的率領(lǐng)與否及程度則視具體情況而定),以民主促抗日最終勝利,并進(jìn)而率領(lǐng)民眾進(jìn)一步進(jìn)行反帝反封建任務(wù)以完成新民主主義革命的歷史史命、歷史地位或具體活動。領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)的歸屬問題,共產(chǎn)黨承認(rèn)國民黨的抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位但保持自身獨(dú)立性,且在行動中積極爭取事實領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位。共產(chǎn)黨作為事實上的抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo),需要通過抗日民族統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線的基本組織形式、主要采取爭取領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)的方式、在實際行動中堅持實現(xiàn)抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的基本條件,以保持自身作為抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的地位和發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有作用。 第二章：國民黨對抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的認(rèn)識。本章系統(tǒng)闡述國民黨對“抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)”內(nèi)涵、抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)歸屬、保持抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位和發(fā)揮其作用等方面的認(rèn)識等。國民黨認(rèn)為抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的內(nèi)涵是：國民黨組織主要采取德、行動、無形、組織等方式方法,使社會組織或個人自覺自愿地以三民主義為其思想指導(dǎo),為實現(xiàn)抗戰(zhàn)建國的近期社會發(fā)展目標(biāo)和實現(xiàn)三民主義的長遠(yuǎn)社會發(fā)展目標(biāo)而產(chǎn)生協(xié)同有效的活動�？箲�(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)是當(dāng)時作為中國合法執(zhí)政黨的國民黨的理所擔(dān)當(dāng)。國民黨需要正確處理對外關(guān)系、組訓(xùn)民眾養(yǎng)成自衛(wèi)和自治能力、實行戰(zhàn)時經(jīng)濟(jì)體制、加強(qiáng)國民黨自身建設(shè)等,以保持自己的抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位和發(fā)揮其相應(yīng)作用。 第三章：民主黨派對抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的認(rèn)識。本章系統(tǒng)闡述民主黨派對“抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)”內(nèi)涵、抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)歸屬、保持抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位和發(fā)揮其作用等方面的認(rèn)識。民主黨派認(rèn)為抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的內(nèi)涵是：把組織協(xié)調(diào)能力充分運(yùn)用于帶領(lǐng)全中國人民成功抵御日本侵略的中華民國合法政府及其執(zhí)政黨�？箲�(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)歸屬于國民黨及其政府。并且,民主黨派希望國民黨在逐步實現(xiàn)人民民主權(quán)利、正確處理黨派和對外關(guān)系等方面作出努力,以保持自身的抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位和發(fā)揮抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)作用。 第四章：比較三大政治力量在“抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)”內(nèi)涵、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)歸屬、保持抗戰(zhàn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位和發(fā)揮其作用等方面認(rèn)識上的異同點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:The connotation of the leadership of the Communist Party of China, the Kuomintang and the Chinese democratic parties (hereinafter referred to as the Communist Party, the Kuomintang and the democratic parties) in the War of Resistance against Japan, The ownership of leadership and the maintenance and exertion of leadership in the War of Resistance have their own understanding. Around the above question, the main part of the article is divided into four chapters. The first chapter: the Communist Party's understanding of the leadership of the War of Resistance against Japan. This chapter systematically expounds the Communist Party's understanding of the connotation of "leadership in the War of Resistance", the ownership of the leadership of the War of Resistance against Japan, the maintenance of its leading position and the exertion of its role. The Communist Party believes that the connotation of the leadership in the War of Resistance against Japan is that the Communist Party, which has historical foresight, has actively fought for and consciously shouldered the leadership. The background of the all-out Anti-Japanese War, which was attached to the New Democratic Revolution, gave him political and organizational leadership to lead the Chinese people (mainly workers, peasants and petty bourgeoisie). Whether or not the big landlords and the big bourgeoisie will be led or not will depend on the specific circumstances, so as to promote the ultimate victory against Japan through democracy, and then lead the people to further carry out the task of opposing imperialism and feudalism in order to complete the historical mandate of the new democratic revolution. Historical status or specific activity Regarding the ownership of leadership, the Communist Party recognized the leadership of the Kuomintang in the War of Resistance but maintained its own independence, and actively fought for the de facto leadership in its actions. As a de facto leader in the War of Resistance against Japan, the Communist Party needs to adopt the basic organizational form of the anti-Japanese national United front, mainly by means of striving for leadership, and to persist in realizing the basic conditions for leadership in the war of resistance in practice. In order to maintain their position as leaders in the War of Resistance and play its due role. Chapter two: the Kuomintang's understanding of the leadership of the War of Resistance against Japan. This chapter systematically expounds the KMT's understanding of the connotation of "leadership in the War of Resistance", the ownership of leadership of the War of Resistance against Japan, the maintenance of its leading position and the exertion of its role. The KMT believes that the connotation of the leadership in the War of Resistance against Japan is that the Kuomintang organizations mainly adopt the methods of virtue, action, intangibility and organization, so that social organizations or individuals voluntarily take the three people's principles as their ideological guidance. In order to realize the short-term social development goal of the Anti-Japanese War and the long-term social development goal of the three people's principles, the coordinated and effective activities were produced. The leadership of the Anti-Japanese War was the responsibility of the Kuomintang, which was then a legitimate ruling party in China. It is necessary for the Kuomintang to correctly handle foreign relations, train the masses to develop the ability of self-defense and autonomy, implement the wartime economic system, and strengthen the Kuomintang's own construction so as to maintain its leading position in the War of Resistance against Japan and give play to its corresponding role. Chapter three: Democratic parties' understanding of the leadership of the War of Resistance against Japan. This chapter systematically expounds the democratic parties' understanding of the connotation of "leadership in the Anti-Japanese War", the ownership of the leadership of the Anti-Japanese War, the maintenance of the leading position of the Anti-Japanese War and the exertion of its role. The democratic parties believe that the connotation of the leadership in the War of Resistance against Japan is that the ability of organization and coordination should be fully applied to the legitimate government of the Republic of China and its ruling party, which led the whole Chinese people to successfully resist Japanese aggression. The leadership of the War of Resistance belongs to the Kuomintang and its government. Moreover, the democratic parties hope that the Kuomintang will make efforts in gradually realizing the people's democratic rights and correctly handling party and foreign relations so as to maintain its leading position in the War of Resistance against Japan and play its leading role in the War of Resistance against Japan. Chapter four: compare the similarities and differences of the three political forces in the connotation, the ownership of the leadership, the maintenance of the leading position and the exertion of the role of the three major political forces in the Anti-Japanese War.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：K265

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭德宏;抗日戰(zhàn)爭領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)新論[J];安徽史學(xué);1995年01期

2 馬慧吉;;論中國共產(chǎn)黨在抗日民族統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線中政治資源的積累[J];重慶社會主義學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年03期

3 劉劍華;“抗日戰(zhàn)爭領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)”觀點(diǎn)綜述[J];黨史研究與教學(xué);1996年05期

4 王鳳英;論中國共產(chǎn)黨對抗日戰(zhàn)爭的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)作用[J];黨史研究與教學(xué);2001年06期

5 何仲山;第二次國共合作史研究綜述[J];民國檔案;1998年02期

6 馮梯云;對民主黨派同中國共產(chǎn)黨親密合作優(yōu)良傳統(tǒng)的認(rèn)識[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號：1859737