圓明園為中國奸民焚掠說辨析
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-04-08 21:36
本文選題:圓明園 切入點(diǎn):中國奸民 出處:《北京社會(huì)科學(xué)》2017年08期
【摘要】:關(guān)于圓明園慘遭焚毀的原因,史學(xué)界歷來都是眾說紛紜,莫衷一是。其中的"中國奸民焚掠說",不但有些外國侵略者持此觀點(diǎn),一些清代的學(xué)者文人也有這一方面的記載,但并未得到歷史學(xué)者認(rèn)同。然而近年,不斷有人撰文,特別是網(wǎng)上的許多文章,多將圓明園的焚毀完全歸咎于中國的奸民。經(jīng)過爬梳相關(guān)史料,認(rèn)為需要明確:所謂圓明園為中國奸民焚掠的說法是錯(cuò)誤的,必須厘清事實(shí),修正錯(cuò)誤,以正視聽。
[Abstract]:The historical circle has always had different opinions about the cause of Old Summer Palace being burned down.Not only some foreign invaders hold this view, but some scholars in Qing Dynasty also have records of this aspect, but they are not recognized by historians.In recent years, however, more and more articles, especially on the Internet, have blamed Old Summer Palace's incineration entirely on Chinese adulterers.After combing through the relevant historical data, the author thinks that it is wrong to say that Old Summer Palace burned and plundered for the Chinese adulterers, and must clarify the facts and correct the mistakes in order to correct the situation.
【作者單位】: 北京師范大學(xué)歷史學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】:K252
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 ;反日會(huì)通過懲儆奸商辦法木籠陳列鬧市[J];時(shí)代教育(先鋒國家歷史);2008年13期
,本文編號(hào):1723435
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgjxds/1723435.html
教材專著