本文選題：華盛頓會(huì)議　切入點(diǎn)：外交　出處：《首都師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：1921年11月12日至1922年2月6日,美、英、法、意、日、荷、比、葡以及中國等9國在美國首都華盛頓舉行會(huì)議。這次會(huì)議在美國居主導(dǎo)地位的情況下,確立了戰(zhàn)后帝國主義列強(qiáng)在遠(yuǎn)東、太平洋地區(qū)的新秩序,對(duì)中國也產(chǎn)生了深遠(yuǎn)的影響。會(huì)后中國社會(huì)各界對(duì)華會(huì)出現(xiàn)了諸多不同的認(rèn)識(shí)。 第一章主要介紹了社會(huì)各界對(duì)中國參加華會(huì)的認(rèn)識(shí)：第一,對(duì)中國代表團(tuán)的無組織無紀(jì)律、無所事事以及冗員冗費(fèi)感到失望,對(duì)三位全權(quán)代表也出現(xiàn)了褒貶不一的評(píng)價(jià)。第二,通過華會(huì)的結(jié)果,國人對(duì)北京政府的華會(huì)外交大多持批評(píng)態(tài)度,甚至轉(zhuǎn)而放棄北方政府,支持南方政府。 第二章主要討論了社會(huì)各界對(duì)華會(huì)參會(huì)各外方的認(rèn)識(shí)。社會(huì)各界首先分析了美國在華會(huì)上的外交,并對(duì)美國的外交政策表示失望；其次,分析了日本參加華會(huì)的外交表現(xiàn)及背后原因,并表達(dá)了對(duì)于日本外交的不滿；最后介紹了英國聯(lián)美的消極的外交、法國奇特的外交和意、比、荷、葡四等國的外交。 第三章是社會(huì)各界對(duì)華會(huì)議案的認(rèn)識(shí)。首先,談到了社會(huì)各界對(duì)魯案的兩種認(rèn)識(shí),即魯案解決后我國收回了一些權(quán)利和魯案解決使我國經(jīng)濟(jì)上受到了損失及對(duì)魯案解決的反對(duì)。其次,介紹了社會(huì)團(tuán)體、中國共產(chǎn)黨人和社會(huì)輿論對(duì)《九國公約》的反對(duì)態(tài)度。 第四章為社會(huì)各界對(duì)中國參加華會(huì)結(jié)果的評(píng)判。首先,介紹了社會(huì)各界對(duì)華會(huì)各列強(qiáng)得與失的認(rèn)識(shí)；其次,社會(huì)各界認(rèn)真分析了中國華會(huì)外交的成與敗。再次,歸納了時(shí)人認(rèn)為中國華會(huì)上外交失敗的原因。最后,提出了外交上要獨(dú)立自主,內(nèi)政上要改革的努力方向。 結(jié)語部分歸納了會(huì)后社會(huì)各界對(duì)華會(huì)兩種認(rèn)識(shí)傾向,闡發(fā)了會(huì)后社會(huì)各界對(duì)華會(huì)的認(rèn)識(shí)的重要意義。
[Abstract]:November 12, 1921-February 6, 1922, the United States, Britain, France, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Portugal, Portugal and China held a meeting in Washington, D.C.The conference established the new order of the postwar imperialist powers in the far East and the Pacific, and had a profound influence on China.After the meeting, the Chinese society from all walks of life to China will appear many different understanding.The first chapter mainly introduces the understanding of China's participation in the China Conference from all walks of life. First, it is disappointed by the Chinese delegation's lack of discipline, doing nothing and redundant staff redundancy. The three plenipotentiaries have also been appraised with different opinions.Second, through the results of the Chinese Congress, most of the Chinese people have criticized the Beijing government for its diplomacy, and even turned to abandon the northern government and support the southern government.The second chapter mainly discusses the understanding of the various foreign parties.All circles of society first analyzed the diplomacy of the United States in China and expressed disappointment at the foreign policy of the United States, secondly, analyzed the diplomatic performance and the reasons behind Japan's participation in the China Conference, and expressed their dissatisfaction with Japan's diplomacy.Finally, it introduces the negative diplomacy of Britain and the United States, the peculiar diplomacy of France and Italy, the diplomacy of Belgium, the Netherlands and the four countries of Portugal.The third chapter is the understanding of the motion of the China Council from all walks of life.First of all, it talks about two kinds of cognition of Lu case from all walks of life, that is, after the settlement of Lu case, our country recovered some rights and the solution of Lu case made our country suffer economic losses and oppose the solution of Lu case.Secondly, it introduces the opposition of social organizations, Chinese Communists and public opinion to the Nine-Nation Convention.The fourth chapter is the evaluation of China's participation in the China Conference.First of all, it introduces the social understanding of the gains and losses of the various powers of the China Society; secondly, the society seriously analyzes the success and failure of the Chinese Society's diplomacy.Thirdly, the author sums up the reasons for the failure of diplomacy in China.Finally, the paper puts forward the direction of reform in diplomacy and reform in internal affairs.The conclusion part sums up two kinds of understanding tendencies of the society after the meeting, and explains the important significance of the understanding of the conference from all walks of life after the meeting.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：首都師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：K261

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 熊斌;任宣羽;;“國民外交”語境下中央、地方、國民互動(dòng)關(guān)系研究——以華盛頓會(huì)議為中心的考察[J];西南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年05期

2 熊斌;;旅美華僑與華盛頓會(huì)議[J];華僑華人歷史研究;2009年02期

3 唐洲雁;;從巴黎和會(huì)到華盛頓會(huì)議——毛澤東美國觀的初步形成[J];湘潭大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

4 熊斌;;留美學(xué)生與華盛頓會(huì)議[J];重慶師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年05期

5 馮夏根;胡旭華;;留美學(xué)生羅家倫與華盛頓會(huì)議[J];徐州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

6 周斌;;論華盛頓會(huì)議前后的全國國民外交大會(huì)[J];湖南城市學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

7 文心;北京各團(tuán)體國民外交聯(lián)合會(huì)紀(jì)事[J];民國檔案;2005年02期

8 陳廷湘;1920年前后兩次爭(zhēng)國權(quán)運(yùn)動(dòng)的異樣形態(tài)及形成原因[J];近代史研究;2005年02期

9 顧瑩惠;論20世紀(jì)初的中國國民外交[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2002年04期

10 馬敏;“紳商”詞義及其內(nèi)涵的幾點(diǎn)討論[J];歷史研究;2001年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 周斌;20世紀(jì)20年代民間外交觀念及其實(shí)踐活動(dòng)[D];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 鄧思敏;華盛頓會(huì)議期間的國民外交（1921.6～1922.2）[D];華中師范大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1717360