本文選題：蔣介石　切入點：汪精衛(wèi)　出處：《浙江大學(xué)》2012年博士論文

【摘要】：以1931年“湯山事件”為契機,汪精衛(wèi)與胡漢民形成合作關(guān)系,共同對抗蔣介石,形成寧粵對峙局面。“九一八”事變后,政治局勢陡變,隨著汪胡合作逐步走向絕境,蔣汪開始接近并醞釀形成合作關(guān)系。在攜手擊垮代表粵方基本利益的孫科內(nèi)閣后,蔣汪合作正式成局,并形成“蔣主軍,汪主政,蔣汪共主黨”的權(quán)力分配格局。嗣后,在因應(yīng)“一二八”抗戰(zhàn)的過程中,蔣汪合作關(guān)系得到初步鞏固。1932年8月,汪精衛(wèi)與張學(xué)良發(fā)生齷齪,并逐步升級,導(dǎo)致政局持續(xù)動蕩。蔣介石實施旨在維持現(xiàn)狀的初步善后舉措,但卻鎩羽而歸。面對政治僵局,蔣被迫實施“棄汪保張”的舉措,張學(xué)良在華北的地位在實質(zhì)上得到維護,汪精衛(wèi)則憤而出國養(yǎng)病,蔣汪合作遭遇頓挫。至1933年熱河淪陷,日軍進攻長城各口,局勢的演進迫使蔣不得不轉(zhuǎn)變立場,實施“去張聯(lián)汪”的舉措,蔣汪合作藉此恢復(fù)。以汪精衛(wèi)1933年復(fù)職為標志,蔣汪間不僅政治互信得以鞏固,政策理念共識趨于擴大,且在此基礎(chǔ)上對合作格局實施一系列調(diào)整。經(jīng)歷此次調(diào)整,不僅“廬山模式”浮出水面,且蔣汪間的權(quán)力地位關(guān)系趨于相對平衡狀態(tài)。1934年發(fā)生之“顧案”及其善后過程,即非常典型地反映出這種權(quán)力地位的相對平衡狀態(tài)。國民黨內(nèi)部連綿不斷的反汪運動,既有政治體制的諸多弊端,對蔣汪合作關(guān)系構(gòu)成持續(xù)負面影響。1935年所發(fā)生的汪精衛(wèi)辭職事件,與這兩個面向的因素存在直接邏輯關(guān)聯(lián)。國民黨五全大會前后,蔣汪合作關(guān)系雖不可避免地遭到損害,但卻并未在實質(zhì)上動搖二人的合作基礎(chǔ)。1936年西安事變的爆發(fā),埋下蔣汪關(guān)系最終決裂的種子,在蔣汪關(guān)系演進歷程上具有轉(zhuǎn)折意義。此后蔣汪關(guān)系持續(xù)惡化,不可逆轉(zhuǎn)地走向完全破裂。
[Abstract]:Taking the "Tangshan incident" in 1931 as an opportunity, Wang Jingwei and Hu Han-min formed a cooperative relationship to jointly confront Jiang Jieshi and formed a situation of confrontation between Ningxia and Guangdong. After the "September 18" incident, the political situation changed steeply, and with the cooperation between Wang and Hu gradually went to an end. Jiang Wang began to approach and form a cooperative relationship. After working hand in hand to defeat the cabinet of Sun Ke, which represented the basic interests of the Guangdong side, Jiang Wang's cooperation formally became a situation, and formed the power distribution pattern of "Chiang's main army, Wang's government, and Jiang Wang's Communist Party." In response to the "1228" War of Resistance, Jiang Wang's cooperative relations were initially consolidated. In August 1932, Wang Jingwei and Zhang Xueliang got dirty and gradually escalated. This led to continued political instability. Jiang Jieshi implemented initial measures aimed at maintaining the status quo, but failed. In the face of the political deadlock, Chiang was forced to implement the "abandonment of Wang Bao-Zhang" initiative, and the status of Zhang Xueliang in North China was virtually safeguarded. Wang Jingwei went abroad to recuperate his illness, and Jiang Wang's cooperation suffered a setback. By the time the Japanese army attacked the Great Wall in 1933, the evolution of the situation forced Jiang to change his stance and implement the move of "going to Zhang Lian Wang." With Wang Jingwei's reinstatement in 1933, Jiang and Wang not only consolidated political mutual trust, but also expanded the consensus of policy concepts, and on this basis implemented a series of adjustments to the pattern of cooperation. Not only "Lushan Model" surfaced, but also the power status relationship between Jiang Wang tended to be relatively balanced. That is, a very typical reflection of this relative balance of power. The incessant anti-Wang movement within the Kuomintang has many drawbacks in the political system. The resignation of Wang Jingwei in 1935 had a direct and logical connection with these two facets. Before and after the Fifth National Congress of the Kuomintang, Jiang Wang's cooperative relations were inevitably damaged. The outbreak of the Xi'an incident in 1936 sowed the seeds of the final rupture of the Chiang Wang relationship, which had a turning point in the evolution of the Jiang Wang relationship. Since then, the Jiang Wang relationship has continued to deteriorate. Move irreversibly towards complete rupture.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：K262.9

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 謝曉鵬;;30年來中國大陸汪精衛(wèi)研究述評[J];安徽史學(xué);2010年05期

2 陳紅民;胡漢民年表(1931年9月—1936年5月)(上)[J];民國檔案;1986年01期

3 馬振犢;蔣汪關(guān)系與華北危局[J];民國檔案;1990年02期

4 王樹蔭;試論抗戰(zhàn)開始后蔣、汪矛盾激化分道揚鑣的原因[J];民國檔案;1992年02期

5 劉華明;汪精衛(wèi)叛國出逃探微[J];民國檔案;1993年02期

6 蘇宗轍;汪精衛(wèi)叛國投敵原因再探[J];民國檔案;1993年03期

7 陳紅民;張玲;郭昌文;;沖突與折衷:國民黨五全大會延期召開原因探討[J];民國檔案;2009年01期

8 肖如平;;寧粵對峙與蔣介石的第二次下野[J];民國檔案;2009年02期

9 劉大禹;;個人權(quán)力之爭還是政治態(tài)度之爭——也談寧粵對峙、和解與制度變遷[J];民國檔案;2009年04期

10 劉大禹;姚路英;;五全大會與蔣介石個人集權(quán)政治的形成[J];民國檔案;2011年01期

，

本文編號：1673145