本文選題：抗戰(zhàn)時(shí)期　切入點(diǎn)：冀熱遼　出處：《河南大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)時(shí)期,侵華日軍為了確保對(duì)偽“滿洲國(guó)”的統(tǒng)治,在冀熱遼區(qū)的長(zhǎng)城沿線附近,以長(zhǎng)城為軸線,制造了長(zhǎng)達(dá)千余里的無(wú)人區(qū)戰(zhàn)略封鎖線,也稱為千里無(wú)人區(qū)。對(duì)于無(wú)人區(qū)的研究,一般是從軍事的視角來(lái)探討無(wú)人區(qū),從政策的視角來(lái)進(jìn)行研究的比較少。有的研究雖注意到日軍制造無(wú)人區(qū)的政策,但都從軍事視角來(lái)進(jìn)行考察。 本文從無(wú)人區(qū)化政策的視角來(lái)考察日軍制造的無(wú)人區(qū)。日偽當(dāng)局在制造無(wú)人區(qū)的過(guò)程中,借鑒了東北三省實(shí)行的集團(tuán)部落政策,并把它加以補(bǔ)充與完善,使之成為制造無(wú)人區(qū)的指導(dǎo)性政策。日偽當(dāng)局把集團(tuán)部落建設(shè)稱之為治本措施加以重視,在建設(shè)集團(tuán)部落之前,日偽當(dāng)局以軍事討伐作為治標(biāo)措施配合集團(tuán)部落的建設(shè)。為此,專門成立以西南防衛(wèi)委員會(huì)為中心的鎮(zhèn)壓機(jī)構(gòu),包括偽滿第五憲兵團(tuán)、日本承德憲兵隊(duì)、偽滿軍、日本軍、西南地區(qū)特務(wù)憲兵隊(duì)等。這些機(jī)構(gòu)建立后,日偽當(dāng)局開(kāi)始進(jìn)行軍事鎮(zhèn)壓,制定相應(yīng)的政策文件,劃定了無(wú)人區(qū)的范圍,展開(kāi)對(duì)無(wú)人無(wú)人區(qū)軍民的討伐與屠殺,用“三光政策”屠殺拒不遷入集團(tuán)部落的民眾。 集團(tuán)部落是無(wú)人區(qū)化政策實(shí)施的落腳點(diǎn)、政治與經(jīng)濟(jì)統(tǒng)治的據(jù)點(diǎn),也是日偽的治本措施的重點(diǎn)內(nèi)容之一。日偽當(dāng)局為了實(shí)現(xiàn)“匪民分離”,將劃入無(wú)人區(qū)的民眾驅(qū)趕進(jìn)集團(tuán)部落,首先進(jìn)行了集團(tuán)部落建設(shè),出臺(tái)了建設(shè)計(jì)劃、時(shí)間,用三年多時(shí)間基本完成冀熱遼區(qū)的部落建設(shè)。集團(tuán)部落建成后,日偽在部落內(nèi)部進(jìn)行了政治與經(jīng)濟(jì)的統(tǒng)治。日偽當(dāng)局推行的無(wú)人區(qū)化政策給當(dāng)?shù)氐慕?jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)與人的心理造成重大的影響。無(wú)人區(qū)的農(nóng)業(yè)嚴(yán)重衰退、商業(yè)貿(mào)易蕭條,為戰(zhàn)勝敵人,“走私”貿(mào)易發(fā)展。社會(huì)中人與人之間的關(guān)系、社會(huì)的原有問(wèn)題(如毒品問(wèn)題)、日偽人員與無(wú)人區(qū)民眾的心理都發(fā)生了變化。為粉碎日偽的無(wú)人區(qū)化政策,中共及其領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下的八路軍,在無(wú)人區(qū)正確執(zhí)行黨的抗日民族統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線政策,進(jìn)行了黨組織、政權(quán)與軍隊(duì)建設(shè),這些因素所產(chǎn)生的巨大力量是日偽無(wú)人區(qū)化政策失敗的根本原因。 總之,無(wú)人區(qū)化政策是侵華日軍統(tǒng)治政策調(diào)整的產(chǎn)物,是以集團(tuán)部落建設(shè)統(tǒng)治為治本措施、以軍事鎮(zhèn)壓為治標(biāo)措施,“標(biāo)本兼治”的殖民固邊政策。
[Abstract]:During the Anti-Japanese War, in order to ensure the rule of the puppet "Manchukuo", the Japanese invaders took the Great Wall as the axis near the the Great Wall in the Hebei and Liaoning areas and created a strategic blockade line for more than a thousand miles in no man's land. It is also called a thousand miles no man's land. For the study of no man's land, we generally discuss it from a military perspective, but less from the perspective of policy. Some studies have paid attention to the Japanese army's policy of creating no man's land. But all from a military point of view to investigate. From the perspective of the policy of no-man 's regionalization, this paper examines the no-man 's land made by the Japanese army. In the process of making no man's land, the Japanese pseudo-bogus authorities draw lessons from the group tribal policy implemented in the three northeastern provinces, and supplement and perfect it. To make it a guiding policy for the manufacture of no man's land. The Japanese and pseudo-Japanese authorities called group tribal construction a radical measure to be attached importance to. Before the establishment of a group tribe, the Japanese and pseudo-Japanese authorities took the military crusade as a palliative measure to cooperate with the building of the group tribe. To this end, A special repressive organization centered on the Southwest Defence Council was set up, including the Fifth Puppet Manchu Gendarmerie Regiment, the Japanese Gendarmerie Corps of Chengde, the puppet Manchu Army, the Japanese Army, the South West region Special Gendarmerie Brigade, and so on. After the establishment of these institutions, The Japanese puppet authorities began to carry out military repression, drew up corresponding policy documents, delineated the scope of no man's land, carried out a crusade and massacre against the army and people of no man's no man's land, and used the "three Light Policy" to slaughter the people who refused to move into the tribe. The clique tribes are the foothold of the policy of no-man 's regionalization and the stronghold of political and economic rule. In order to achieve the separation of bandits and the people, the Japanese and puppet authorities drove the people who were classified into no-man 's areas into the group tribes. First, they carried out the group tribal construction, and issued a construction plan and time. It took more than three years to basically complete the tribal construction in the Jireliao area. After the establishment of the group tribe, the Japanese puppet ruled the tribe politically and economically. The policy of no-man 's regionalization pursued by the Japanese and puppet authorities gave the local economy. The social and human psychology has had a great impact. Agriculture in no man's land is in serious decline, business and trade are depressed. Trade in "smuggling" develops in order to defeat the enemy. The relationship between people in society, The old social problems (such as the drug problem, the psychology of the Japanese puppet and the people in the no-man 's area) have changed. In order to crush the policy of "no man's land", the Communist Party of China and its eighth Route Army under the leadership of the Communist Party of China and the eighth Route Army under its leadership have changed. The correct implementation of the Party's anti-Japanese national United front policy in the no-man 's areas and the construction of the Party organizations, political power and the armed forces are the fundamental reasons for the failure of the policy of "no man's land". In a word, the policy of no-man 's regionalization is the result of the adjustment of the Japanese army's ruling policy against China. It is a colonial policy of fixing the border with the rule of the group tribal construction as the fundamental measure, the military suppression as the temporary measure, and the colonial policy of "treating both the symptoms and the symptoms".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：K265

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 車霽虹;淪陷時(shí)期日本帝國(guó)主義在東北建立的“集團(tuán)部落”[J];北方文物;1995年03期

2 彭明生;;千里無(wú)人區(qū)匯集成中國(guó)的最大萬(wàn)人坑[J];承德民族師專學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

3 李倩;;淪陷時(shí)期日本在吉林建立“集團(tuán)部落”剖析[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

4 申玉山;侵華日軍在華北制造的“無(wú)人區(qū)”研究[J];東方論壇(青島大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2004年04期

5 申玉山;侵華日軍長(zhǎng)城內(nèi)側(cè)制造“無(wú)人區(qū)”新罪證[J];黨史博采;2004年09期

6 申玉山;論侵華日軍在河北制造的“無(wú)人區(qū)”[J];河北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年02期

7 申玉山,趙志偉;侵華日軍在華北制造“無(wú)人區(qū)”的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)研究;2005年01期

8 韓學(xué)平;試析中共東北黨組織反對(duì)日偽“集團(tuán)部落”斗爭(zhēng)失利的原因[J];龍江黨史;1994年01期

9 周圣亮;東北抗日聯(lián)軍反“集團(tuán)部落”斗爭(zhēng)[J];龍江黨史;1998年03期

10 車霽虹;日本帝國(guó)主義在黑龍江建立“集團(tuán)部落”剖析[J];龍江社會(huì)科學(xué);1994年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 崔明玉;日偽在延邊地區(qū)的“集團(tuán)部落”建設(shè)及其影響[D];延邊大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1648827