本文選題：汪偽政權(quán)　切入點：通敵　出處：《南京大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：自1937年七七事變至1945年日軍投降,中國的抗日戰(zhàn)爭長達(dá)八年,約三分之一的國土淪于日軍之手。然而,在這片地區(qū)上還居住著億萬民眾,生活依舊要繼續(xù),他們的生存境況仍需要一個新政權(quán)去維護。當(dāng)中國的民族主義掀起了高潮之際,淪陷區(qū)內(nèi)卻出現(xiàn)了大量的漢奸政權(quán),如汪精衛(wèi)國民政府。 1938年12月19日,汪精衛(wèi)出走前往河內(nèi)。12月29日,汪精衛(wèi)發(fā)出《致中央常務(wù)委員會國防最高會議書》與“艷電”。1940年,在日本支那派遣軍的扶持下,在南京建立以汪精衛(wèi)為國民政府代主席及行政院長,周佛海、陳公博、李士群、林柏生等為主要成員的中華民國國民政府。這段復(fù)雜的被占領(lǐng)的屈辱歷史實為中國近代史中最棘手的話題之一。汪政權(quán)的通敵并不是孤立的,不久,在納粹鐵蹄踐踏下的歐洲淪陷區(qū)也成立了眾多的通敵政權(quán),如法國的維希政府,而兩者在意識形態(tài)方面也有諸多的相似性。 除緒論與結(jié)語外,本文共分為三章。第一章首先分析“漢奸”一詞在傳統(tǒng)中國文化中的含義,然后梳理了清末以來盛行的“黃色種族主義”說與“大亞洲主義”說,進而從“恐共”的角度敘述汪精衛(wèi)及其追隨者與日共謀活動的源起乃純潔三民主義的必要。第二章從三民主義入手,汪精衛(wèi)通過把自己塑造為孫中山思想唯一正統(tǒng)繼承人為通敵政權(quán)努力建立政治合法性,同時與法國通敵政權(quán)進行比較,將通敵行為置于更廣大的跨區(qū)域視野中進行考量。第三章分析戰(zhàn)時汪政權(quán)與其他通敵政權(quán)之間的往來,以及戰(zhàn)后審判中汪政權(quán)對世界其他通敵政權(quán)活動的援引,說明汪政權(quán)的通敵行為在世界范圍內(nèi)并非獨特現(xiàn)象。 本文從橫向與縱向具體分析了汪政權(quán)主要領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人的通敵的意識形態(tài)。故在縱向上,文章自清末在中國盛行的“黃色種族主義”與“大亞洲主義”論起,進而談及在其后的革命歷程中,汪政權(quán)主要領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人思想中最基本的“恐共”思想,發(fā)掘汪精衛(wèi)及其追隨者投敵的思想源起；在橫向上,將汪政權(quán)與其他通敵政權(quán),尤其是法國貝當(dāng)政權(quán)進行比較,指出汪的與敵共謀在二戰(zhàn)當(dāng)中并不是孤立的,將著眼點放在“民族國家”的概念對中、法兩個通敵政權(quán)意識形態(tài)的影響,分析汪偽政府在宣傳中如何經(jīng)常以貝當(dāng)政府為例,為自己的合法性提供支持。由于與敵共謀以及在淪陷區(qū)內(nèi)的極權(quán)統(tǒng)治,在戰(zhàn)后的審判中,這兩個偽政權(quán)的合法性都被徹底否定；中國政府在審判汪偽政府的過程中借用了審判貝當(dāng)一案,不僅增強了貝當(dāng)政權(quán)作為一個通敵符號的國際影響力,同時也賦予“漢奸”一詞以新的意義。 長期以來中國人筆下的抗戰(zhàn)史,基本都在強調(diào)“抵抗與苦難”的“國族主義”式非黑即白的二元化論述。對于淪陷區(qū)內(nèi)的通敵情況,不是忽略,便是后見之明的道德判斷,而缺少設(shè)身處地的理解。而本文則試圖將汪的通敵行徑置于一種更廣的歷史語境中去討論并重新理解,對二元化的國族主義史觀加以修正,冷靜而客觀地分析通敵問題,在全球化視野下給予通敵行為一種多元化的視角考察。
[Abstract]:From 1937 77 to 1945 incident to surrender the Japanese Chinese war for eight years, about 1/3 of the land into the hands of the Japanese. However, in this area is inhabited by hundreds of millions of people, life goes on, their survival situation still needs a new regime to maintain. When Chinese nationalism the climax of the occasion, the occupied zone appeared a large number of traitors regime, such as the national government of Wang Jingwei.
In December 19, 1938, Wang Jingwei went to Hanoi.12 on Sept. 29, Wang Jingwei issued by the Standing Committee of the national defense "and" the Supreme Council Book of Yan electric.1940, in Japan, China expeditionary army support, established by Wang Jingwei for the national government on behalf of the chairman and the president, Zhou Fohai, Chen Gongbo, Li Shiqun in Nanjing, Lin Baisheng as the main the members of the national government of the Republic of China. One of the most difficult topic of this complex is occupied by the history of humiliation is China in modern history. Soon the Wang regime of collaboration is not isolated, and in Europe under the cruel oppression of Nazi occupied areas have also established numerous collaborators regime, such as the French Vichy government, and two in the the ideology also has many similarities.
Besides the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter analyzes the "traitor" in the traditional China culture meaning, then combed since the end of the Qing Dynasty popular "yellow racism" and "great Asianism", and from "the origin of fear is necessary to" point of view and narrative of Wang Jingwei on the activities of the followers and conspiracy is pure the ThreePrinciples. The second chapter starts from the principles, by Wang Jingwei himself as the only legitimate heir of Sun Zhongshan thought with the regime to establish political legitimacy, and compared with the French collaborationist regime, the collaboration in the field of cross regional wider considerations. In the third chapter the analysis of Wang's regime and other collaboration power exchanges, and the trial of postwar regime Wang collaborated with other activities of the world quoted that regime, in collaboration Wang regime The boundary is not a unique phenomenon.
This paper from the horizontal and vertical concrete analysis of the main leaders of the Wang regime ideology. So the collaboration in the vertical direction, the Chinese in since the end of the Qing Dynasty popular "yellow racism" and "great Asianism", and then talk about the history of the revolution, the main leaders of Wang's regime thought the most basic "fear of" thought, Wang Jingwei and his followers to explore the thought origin; on the other hand, the Wang regime and other collaborationist regime, especially the French regime compared Wang Petain, pointed out that with the enemy conspiracy during World War II and is not isolated, will focus on the concept of "nation" in the two treason the impact of ideology regime, analysis of Wang puppet government in the propaganda of how often to Petain government as an example, to provide support for their own legitimacy. Due to the enemy conspiracy and totalitarian rule in the occupied zone, in the war After the trial, the legitimacy of the two puppet regime was completely negative; Chinese government borrowed the trial of Bedan during the trial of Wang puppet government in one case, not only enhances the Bedan regime as a symbol with international influence, but also give a "traitor" is a word with a new meaning.
闀挎湡浠ユ潵涓浗浜虹瑪涓嬬殑鎶楁垬鍙，

本文編號：1613235