本文選題：閻錫山　切入點(diǎn)：中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨　出處：《華東師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：閻錫山是民國(guó)歷史上頗有爭(zhēng)議的人物,耐人尋味。辛亥革命后,統(tǒng)一的中央政府已經(jīng)走出歷史舞臺(tái),“合久必分,分久必合”的歷史模式指引著中國(guó)繼續(xù)向前。閻錫山經(jīng)過幾番奮斗終于幡然悔悟,殫精竭慮欲打造山西獨(dú)立王國(guó)。九八事變發(fā)生后,日本發(fā)動(dòng)侵華戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng),山西自然也不能幸免。如何在艱難局勢(shì)中保存自己成為閻錫山?jīng)Q策的出發(fā)點(diǎn)和落腳點(diǎn)。本文遵循歷史與邏輯相一致的原則,從1935-1940年閻錫山與中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨合作抗日的背景、過程、終結(jié)、評(píng)價(jià)等四個(gè)方面,對(duì)雙方實(shí)現(xiàn)合作抗日進(jìn)行梳理和研究。 面對(duì)日本的入侵和蔣介石的排擠,閻錫山選擇與中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨合作抗日,一方面閻錫山是為了維護(hù)自己的統(tǒng)治,另一方面也與閻錫山本人的諸多特質(zhì)分不開,如少年時(shí)代儒家文化的影響、留學(xué)日本的經(jīng)歷,以及具有一定愛國(guó)愛家的情懷等。這一時(shí)期閻錫山選擇與中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨合作抗日,支持山西新派的工作,擴(kuò)建新軍,主張動(dòng)員民眾,實(shí)行全民族抗戰(zhàn),為山西抗戰(zhàn)乃至全國(guó)抗戰(zhàn)做出相當(dāng)?shù)呢暙I(xiàn),值得肯定。但閻錫山大地主、大資產(chǎn)階級(jí)的階級(jí)局限性,又使得雙方的合作處處充滿矛盾,是有限的。 1935-1940年閻錫山與中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨的合作不是一帆風(fēng)順的,基本經(jīng)歷了如下幾次轉(zhuǎn)變：紅軍東征后,雙方互相表示合作誠(chéng)意到上層統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線的建立；七七事變后,雙方實(shí)現(xiàn)全面的合作抗日到合作出現(xiàn)危機(jī)的轉(zhuǎn)變；十二月事變后,雙方劃界而治,閻錫山保持中立,雙方合作名存實(shí)亡。期間中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨的努力最大程度地維護(hù)著雙方的合作,如中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨堅(jiān)持原則性和靈活性的策略,一方面始終堅(jiān)持黨在統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線中的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán),另一方面又能轉(zhuǎn)變斗爭(zhēng)的形式,盡量使決策能夠?yàn)殡p方接受；再如中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨在實(shí)際工作堅(jiān)持獨(dú)立自主的原則,采取既聯(lián)合又斗爭(zhēng)的策略,適時(shí)打擊頑固勢(shì)力的囂張氣焰,壯大了山西抗日力量,發(fā)展和完善了山西抗日民族統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線。
[Abstract]:Yan Xishan is a controversial figure in the history of the Republic of China. After the Revolution of 1911, the unified central government has stepped out of the historical stage. After several struggles, Yan Xishan finally came to repent and worked hard to build an independent kingdom in Shanxi. After the 1998 incident, Japan launched a war of aggression against China. Shanxi is not immune either. How to preserve itself as the starting point and foothold of Yan Xishan's decision-making in the difficult situation. This paper follows the principle of historical and logical consistency, from the background and process of the cooperation and resistance against Japan between Yan Xishan and the Communist Party of China from 1935 to 1940. The conclusion, evaluation and other four aspects, the realization of anti-Japanese cooperation between the two sides to comb and research. In the face of the Japanese invasion and the exclusion of Jiang Jieshi, Yan Xishan chose to cooperate with the Chinese Communist Party to resist Japan. On the one hand, Yan Xishan was to safeguard his own rule, and on the other hand, he was inseparable from the many characteristics of his own. For example, the influence of Confucian culture in childhood, the experience of studying in Japan, and the feeling of loving one's country and family, etc. During this period, Yan Xishan chose to cooperate with the Chinese Communist Party to resist Japan, to support the work of the New School in Shanxi, and to expand the New Army. The proposal to mobilize the people and carry out the whole nation's war of resistance, and to make considerable contributions to the war of resistance in Shanxi and the whole country, is worthy of recognition. However, the class limitations of Yan Xishan's big landlords and big bourgeoisie have made the cooperation between the two sides full of contradictions everywhere. Is limited. The cooperation between Yan Xishan and the Communist Party of China from 1935 to 1940 was not smooth, but basically underwent the following changes: after the Red Army's Eastern invasion, the two sides showed their sincerity in cooperation to the establishment of the upper United front; after the July 7 incident, the two sides showed their sincerity to the establishment of the upper United front. After the December incident, the two sides demarcated and governed, Yan Xishan remained neutral, and the cooperation between the two sides survived in name only. During the period, the efforts of the Chinese Communist Party to the maximum extent maintained the cooperation between the two sides. For example, the Communist Party of China adheres to the strategy of principle and flexibility. On the one hand, it always adheres to the leadership of the Party in the United front, on the other hand, it can change the form of struggle and try its best to make decisions acceptable to both sides. For example, the Communist Party of China adheres to the principle of independence and independence in practical work, adopts the strategy of combining and fighting against the arrogance of diehard forces, strengthens Shanxi's anti-Japanese strength, and develops and perfects Shanxi's anti-Japanese national United front.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：K265

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 高榮貴;;毛澤東與閻錫山的筆墨交往[J];報(bào)刊薈萃;2004年11期

2 郭春梅;抗戰(zhàn)前后中共中央對(duì)閻錫山政策和策略的調(diào)整及影響[J];滄桑;2003年01期

3 劉萬路;;閻錫山與山西抗日民族統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線的建立[J];黨史文苑(學(xué)術(shù)版);2007年04期

4 郭春梅;從犧盟會(huì)的產(chǎn)生運(yùn)作看我黨與國(guó)民黨地方實(shí)力派的抗日合作[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年04期

5 黃禹康;毛澤東爭(zhēng)取閻錫山抗日[J];黨史縱覽;2005年08期

6 喬希章;毛澤東爭(zhēng)取閻錫山[J];湖南黨史;1995年06期

7 李彩花;;閻錫山聯(lián)共抗日原因淺析[J];華章;2008年10期

8 談志興,盧冰;閻錫山與山西青年抗敵決死隊(duì)[J];軍事歷史研究;2000年02期

9 馬小芳;;論中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨對(duì)閻錫山集團(tuán)的統(tǒng)戰(zhàn)策略[J];中國(guó)延安干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1610391