本文選題：晚清　切入點(diǎn)：龍泉司法檔案　出處：《浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2014年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：龍泉司法檔案晚清部分的一些案例顯示了一種可以稱為"屢票不案"的現(xiàn)象:縣官認(rèn)為訴訟內(nèi)容存在虛飾或者有悖情理,本不愿準(zhǔn)理,但在原告的反復(fù)催呈下勉強(qiáng)受理,并簽票傳訊;然而由于縣官在呈狀的批詞中明顯表達(dá)了消極態(tài)度,傳訊差役很容易將其視為非緊急的和有利可圖的,從而在傳訊過(guò)程中更加肆無(wú)忌憚地放縱延宕或舞弊勒索。屢票不案現(xiàn)象是由訴訟雙方的力量共同促成的:訴訟的一方有足夠的財(cái)力或相關(guān)社會(huì)關(guān)系反復(fù)催呈以維持不斷傳訊的局面,此謂"屢票";而另一方則有足夠的財(cái)力或社會(huì)關(guān)系賄賂差役拒絕到庭,此謂"不案"。通常情況下,這個(gè)過(guò)程會(huì)一直延續(xù)下去,直到一方無(wú)力支持為止,而這就在實(shí)際上宣告了一方的敗北和訴訟的終結(jié)。"屢票不案"現(xiàn)象可以視為清代訴訟和司法審判的一種模式。
[Abstract]:Some cases in the late Qing part of the Longquan judicial file show a phenomenon that can be called "repeated vote not case": County officials believe that the content of the lawsuit is false or contrary to reason, and is unwilling to be reasonable, but reluctantly accepts it under repeated reminders from the plaintiff. And to sign a ticket for arraignment; however, since the county magistrate clearly expressed a negative attitude in his written approval, it was easy for the arraignment officers to regard it as non-urgent and profitable, Thus, in the process of arraignment, more wanton indulgence of delay or fraud and extortion. The phenomenon of repeated votes is caused by the power of both parties to the lawsuit: the litigant party has sufficient financial resources or related social relations to repeatedly press for maintenance. In a situation of constant arraignment, This is called "repeated votes", and the other party has sufficient financial or social relations to bribe the officer to refuse to appear in court, which is called "no case". Normally, the process will continue until one party is unable to support it. This actually declared the defeat of one party and the end of litigation, which can be regarded as a mode of litigation and judicial trial in Qing Dynasty.
【作者單位】： 浙江大學(xué)歷史學(xué)系;
【基金】：2013年度國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重大項(xiàng)目(13&ZD151) 2011年度浙江省哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)規(guī)劃“之江青年課題”(11ZJQN046YB)
【分類號(hào)】：K252;D929

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 鄧建鵬;;清代州縣訟案的裁判方式研究──以“黃巖訴訟檔案”為考查對(duì)象[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年03期

2 俞江;關(guān)于“古代中國(guó)有無(wú)民法”問(wèn)題的再思考[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2001年06期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王亞明;杜萬(wàn)松;;中國(guó)民事訴訟依“法”裁判辨正——從檔案統(tǒng)計(jì)的視角[J];阿壩師范高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

2 王亞明;;多元糾紛解決機(jī)制的法文化探析[J];安徽大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2006年02期

3 李相森;;包公斷案中的個(gè)性因素探析[J];安徽大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2009年01期

4 任志強(qiáng);;明清時(shí)期墳塋的紛爭(zhēng)[J];安徽大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2009年01期

5 蔡曉榮;王國(guó)平;;晚清中國(guó)商業(yè)行會(huì)對(duì)洋商的“停交”抵制活動(dòng)——基于經(jīng)濟(jì)和法律的視角[J];安徽史學(xué);2006年05期

6 鄭小春;;清代陋規(guī)及其對(duì)基層司法和地方民情的影響——從徽州訟費(fèi)帳單談起[J];安徽史學(xué);2009年02期

7 姚e，

本文編號(hào)：1586694