本文關(guān)鍵詞： 合作行政 市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì) 信用合作社　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近代合作社不僅是市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的產(chǎn)物,它還是弱勢(shì)生產(chǎn)者通過(guò)共同經(jīng)營(yíng)來(lái)改善自身經(jīng)濟(jì)利益或經(jīng)濟(jì)地位的一種經(jīng)濟(jì)組織。鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)中,在商品交換中處于“劣勢(shì)”地位的農(nóng)民,只有聯(lián)合起來(lái),組織各種類型的合作社,才能以集體的力量參與到市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中去。合作社同市場(chǎng)的結(jié)合能進(jìn)一步改變農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)、收購(gòu)、銷售等環(huán)節(jié)受中間商人盤剝的既有格局。 本文重點(diǎn)分析了南京國(guó)民政府時(shí)期浙江開(kāi)展的合作運(yùn)動(dòng),圍繞著浙江如何在全省范圍內(nèi)建立合作行政機(jī)構(gòu)展開(kāi)探討,并梳理了其變遷的整個(gè)過(guò)程。其后,在建設(shè)廳的大力推動(dòng)下,浙江的合作社組織迎來(lái)了一個(gè)發(fā)展的小高峰,但在高速發(fā)展的背后,暴露出的問(wèn)題也是層出不窮。由于一味地追求發(fā)展速度而導(dǎo)致某些合作社質(zhì)量極為低劣。此外,農(nóng)村對(duì)于金融資金的渴望,則直接造成了信用合作社的畸形發(fā)展。這些問(wèn)題從表象上來(lái)看,似乎是經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題,但實(shí)質(zhì)上,民國(guó)鄉(xiāng)村基層社會(huì)所特有的政治權(quán)力和社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)才是合作運(yùn)動(dòng)異化的最直接誘因。為了擺脫這種困境,省政府通過(guò)派駐合作指導(dǎo)員和建立合作實(shí)驗(yàn)區(qū)的方法來(lái)規(guī)范各地的合作社組織。 此外,當(dāng)時(shí)的調(diào)查報(bào)告客觀反映出浙江各地合作社實(shí)施的一些基本概況,總體來(lái)看,合作社的組織狀況在各地并不樂(lè)觀,各地方政府對(duì)合作事業(yè)的推廣并不十分熱情,甚至連能夠盡職盡責(zé)的合作指導(dǎo)人員也是屈指可數(shù)。 綜觀整個(gè)運(yùn)動(dòng),其亮點(diǎn)主要是體現(xiàn)在信用合作社的組織上。信用社對(duì)農(nóng)村金融的救濟(jì)還是起了一定的作用,因?yàn)檫@種借貸在一定程度上促進(jìn)了農(nóng)業(yè)的生產(chǎn)和改良,改變了鄉(xiāng)村傳統(tǒng)的借貸格局。農(nóng)村建立的各種類型的合作社,無(wú)論是信用、生產(chǎn),還是運(yùn)銷、消費(fèi)等社,其出發(fā)點(diǎn)都是希望能夠借助互助合作,使得人力、物力和財(cái)力得到有效的整合,提高個(gè)體小農(nóng)抗御市場(chǎng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的能力,以團(tuán)體的力量來(lái)抵制商人對(duì)于農(nóng)民的壓榨和盤剝。
[Abstract]:Modern cooperative is not only the product of market economy, but also a kind of economic organization in rural society where the weak producers can improve their economic interests or economic status through joint operation. Peasants who are in a "disadvantaged" position in the exchange of commodities must unite to form various types of co-operatives. The combination of the cooperative and the market can further change the existing pattern of agricultural production, acquisition, sale and other links exploited by the middleman. This paper focuses on the analysis of the cooperation movement in Zhejiang during the Nanjing National Government period, focusing on the establishment of cooperative administrative agencies in Zhejiang province, and combing the whole process of its changes. Under the impetus of the construction department, the cooperative organization in Zhejiang Province ushered in a small peak of development, but behind the rapid development. The problems exposed are also endless. The pursuit of the speed of development leads to the extremely poor quality of some cooperatives. In addition, the rural desire for financial funds. These problems appear to be economic problems, but in essence. In order to get rid of this dilemma, the political power and social structure of the rural grassroots society of the Republic of China are the most direct inducement of the alienation of the cooperative movement. The provincial government standardizes cooperative organizations through the deployment of cooperative instructors and the establishment of cooperative experimental areas. In addition, the survey report at that time objectively reflects the implementation of some of the basic general situation of cooperatives in Zhejiang Province, generally speaking, the organizational situation of cooperatives in the region is not optimistic. Local governments are not enthusiastic about the promotion of partnerships, and even dedicated mentors are few. Looking at the whole movement, its bright spot is mainly reflected in the organization of the credit union, which has played a certain role in the relief of rural finance. To some extent, this kind of loan has promoted the production and improvement of agriculture and changed the traditional pattern of lending in rural areas. All kinds of cooperatives, whether credit, production, distribution or consumption, have been established in rural areas. Its starting point is to hope to be able to cooperate with each other, so that the human, material and financial resources are effectively integrated to improve the individual smallholder resilience to market risks. To resist the oppression and exploitation of the peasants by the merchants with the strength of the group.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：K258

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張書(shū)廷;;南京國(guó)民政府對(duì)戰(zhàn)前中國(guó)農(nóng)村合作運(yùn)動(dòng)的推動(dòng)[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期

2 趙泉民;;政府制度供給與鄉(xiāng)村合作運(yùn)動(dòng)——基于20世紀(jì)前半期中國(guó)鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)史視閾分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2008年11期

3 趙泉民;中國(guó)近代社會(huì)變革時(shí)期的經(jīng)濟(jì)烏托邦主義——薛仙舟的合作經(jīng)濟(jì)思想芻議[J];東方論壇(青島大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2002年06期

4 馮開(kāi)文;建國(guó)前農(nóng)村合作組織低效率的原因探討[J];古今農(nóng)業(yè);1998年03期

5 張士杰;中國(guó)近代農(nóng)村合作運(yùn)動(dòng)的興起和發(fā)展[J];民國(guó)檔案;1992年04期

6 張士杰,馮泓;陳果夫的合作經(jīng)濟(jì)思想及其實(shí)踐[J];民國(guó)檔案;2002年01期

7 梅德平;國(guó)民黨政府時(shí)期農(nóng)村合作社組織變遷的制度分析[J];民國(guó)檔案;2004年02期

8 趙泉民,忻平;鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)整合中的“異趣”——以20世紀(jì)30年代江浙兩省鄉(xiāng)村合作運(yùn)動(dòng)為中心[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年01期

9 姜楓;抗戰(zhàn)前國(guó)民黨的農(nóng)村合作運(yùn)動(dòng)[J];近代史研究;1990年03期

10 劉紀(jì)榮;“烏托邦”還是“理想”:《全國(guó)合作化方案》論析——兼與賴建誠(chéng)先生商榷[J];歷史教學(xué);2005年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 胥德勛;中國(guó)農(nóng)村信用合作社體制研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王小平;民國(guó)時(shí)期福建農(nóng)村合作運(yùn)動(dòng)（1935-1949年）[D];福建師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1493868