發(fā)布時間：2018-01-15 12:30

  本文關鍵詞：一九五六年朝鮮“八月事件”研究　出處：《復旦大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 八月事件 中朝關系 朝鮮國內政治

【摘要】：自從中華人民共和國和朝鮮民主主義人民共和國建立,尤其是朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭中兩國并肩作戰(zhàn)以來,中朝關系一直被視為“血盟”一般的特殊而密切的關系。在冷戰(zhàn)時期嚴峻的兩大陣營對峙格局下,幾十年的宣傳牢固地塑造并鞏固了這種歷史記憶。而且,改革開放至今,中國仍然要維持對朝鮮的影響力,因而中國政府只強調中朝之間的友誼,而并不愿暴露中朝之間的矛盾或分歧。 然而,筆者閱讀已公開的前蘇聯(lián)檔案與一些中外學者的相關研究成果,特別是查閱朝鮮檔案及文獻資料之后就發(fā)現(xiàn),在朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭期間中朝高層領導之間早已產生了矛盾與分歧。而到了1956年,朝鮮也像其他社會主義陣營國家一樣,受到蘇共二十大赫魯曉夫批判斯大林個人崇拜現(xiàn)象的影響,發(fā)生了一場嚴重的朝鮮勞動黨黨內斗爭,即“八月事件”。那次由延安派和部分蘇聯(lián)派聯(lián)合策劃的反金日成活動在朝鮮勞動黨全體會議上未獲成功,隨后發(fā)生了1956年9月中蘇兩國共同干預朝鮮勞動黨內部事件,因而此時中朝關系也陷入低谷。 但是悖論卻是,中蘇共同干預朝鮮事件之后,金日成趁東歐發(fā)生動蕩的時機對反對派進行徹底肅清,這就帶來了中朝關系的好轉與改善。以往的研究成果主要是從東歐發(fā)生的動蕩、中蘇兩國的國內情況、中蘇之間的分歧等外部因素中尋找其原因。不過,本文以朝鮮“八月事件”與之后幾個月的朝鮮國內政治動蕩為研究對象,對于朝鮮國內政治格局與其變化對中朝關系帶來的影響進行分析。為此,本文主要依據朝鮮國家檔案與報刊資料、前蘇聯(lián)檔案和親歷者的回憶以及中、韓、美、日、俄等國學者的研究著作,對此歷史事件進行探討。 本研究的目的在于,通過剖析中朝關系中的另一面,更加全面而客觀地考察中朝關系史。就中國而言,中朝關系仍然是至關重要的雙邊關系,也是最讓中國感到困惑而不易處理的關系之一。正因為如此,本研究不僅具有歷史學方面的意義,而且還可以為現(xiàn)實提供某種借鑒。
[Abstract]:Since the establishment of the people's Republic of China and the Democratic people's Republic of Korea, particularly in the Korean War, the two countries have fought side by side. Sino-DPRK relations have always been regarded as "blood alliance" as a general special and close relationship. In the cold war severe confrontation between the two camps, decades of propaganda firmly shaped and consolidated this historical memory. Since the reform and opening up, China still wants to maintain its influence on North Korea, so the Chinese government only emphasizes the friendship between China and North Korea, and does not want to expose the contradictions or differences between China and North Korea. However, the author has read the published archives of the former Soviet Union and some Chinese and foreign scholars related to the results of research, especially after consulting the DPRK archives and literature on the discovery. During the Korean War, there were already contradictions and disagreements between the top leaders of China and North Korea. By 1956, North Korea was like other socialist countries. Influenced by the criticism of Stalin's personality cult by the Soviet Communist Party's 20 Great Khrushchev, there was a serious inner-party struggle between the Workers' Party of Korea and the Democratic people's Republic of Korea. The "incident of August". The anti-Kim Il Sung campaign, jointly planned by the Yan'an faction and some Soviet factions, was unsuccessful in the plenary session of the Workers' Party of Korea. Then, in September 1956, China and the Soviet Union intervened in the internal affairs of the Workers' Party of Korea, and relations between China and North Korea also fell into a low point. But the paradox is that after the joint intervention of China and the Soviet Union in North Korea, Kim Il-sung took advantage of the turmoil in Eastern Europe to wipe out the opposition thoroughly. This has brought about the improvement and improvement of Sino-Korean relations. The previous research results are mainly from the turbulence in Eastern Europe, the domestic situation of China and the Soviet Union, the differences between China and the Soviet Union, and other external factors. This article takes the "August incident" and the domestic political turbulence in the following months as the research object, and analyzes the influence of the internal political pattern and its changes on the Sino-Korean relations. This article mainly based on the Korean national archives and press materials, the former Soviet Union archives and personal memories, as well as the Chinese, South Korea, the United States, Japan, Russia and other countries of the research work, to explore this historical event. The purpose of this study is to investigate the history of China-DPRK relations more comprehensively and objectively by analyzing the other side of China-DPRK relations. As far as China is concerned, the Sino-DPRK relationship is still a crucial bilateral relationship. It is also one of the most confusing and intractable relationships in China. Because of this, this study not only has historical significance, but also can provide some reference for reality.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：K27

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 沈志華;董潔;;朝鮮戰(zhàn)后重建與中國的經濟援助(1954—1960)[J];中共黨史研究;2011年03期

，

本文編號：1428397