【摘要】：隋唐以后中國(guó)佛教以"宗派"為主要存在形式,這在學(xué)界一度作為進(jìn)一步研究的出發(fā)點(diǎn)。但關(guān)于中國(guó)佛教宗派的形成時(shí)間、宗派數(shù)量、特征以及各宗的形成問(wèn)題一直異說(shuō)紛呈,到20世紀(jì)末,甚至有學(xué)者質(zhì)疑隋唐"宗派"的存在。這些討論對(duì)中國(guó)佛教的研究有積極的促進(jìn)意義;但是對(duì)"宗派"存在的質(zhì)疑,不僅是對(duì)中國(guó)佛教史上隋唐以來(lái)佛教存在方式的歷史事實(shí)的省思,而且是對(duì)百年來(lái)佛教學(xué)術(shù)研究的基本理路的挑戰(zhàn)。本文在分析"宗派"問(wèn)題質(zhì)疑依據(jù)和產(chǎn)生原因的基礎(chǔ)上,認(rèn)為對(duì)隋唐佛教"宗派"存在及其存在方式的重新厘定,需要就"宗派"描述對(duì)中國(guó)佛教的適用性作出回應(yīng)。而"宗派"是否適合描述中國(guó)佛教隋唐之后的生存狀態(tài),首先在于中國(guó)佛教在隋唐之后的發(fā)展,是否具有迥異于六朝佛教的態(tài)勢(shì);其次在于"宗派"能否概括和說(shuō)明這種總體發(fā)展態(tài)勢(shì)。對(duì)隋唐佛教"宗派"存在方式的認(rèn)識(shí),要考慮到佛教宗派形成的過(guò)程性。宗派佛教的發(fā)展,在隋唐時(shí)期還處于一個(gè)建設(shè)期。順應(yīng)著中國(guó)佛教自身的發(fā)展邏輯,中國(guó)佛教宗派的形成是一個(gè)沖突和會(huì)通并存的過(guò)程,以會(huì)通化解沖突,成為隋唐佛教宗派發(fā)展的基色。
[Abstract]:After Sui and Tang dynasties, Chinese Buddhism took "sectarian" as the main form of existence, which was once the starting point of further study in academic circles. However, the formation time, number, characteristics and formation of Buddhist sects in China have been controversial. At the end of the 20th century, some scholars even questioned the existence of "sects" in Sui and Tang dynasties. These discussions are of positive significance to the study of Chinese Buddhism. However, the questioning of the existence of "sectarian" is not only a reflection on the historical facts of the way of Buddhist existence since Sui and Tang dynasties in the history of Chinese Buddhism, but also a challenge to the basic logic of Buddhist academic research in the past hundred years. Based on the analysis of the questioning basis and causes of the problem of "sectarian", this paper holds that it is necessary to respond to the applicability of the description of "sectarian" to Chinese Buddhism in order to redefine the existence and mode of existence of "sectarian" in Sui and Tang dynasties. Whether the "sectarian" is suitable to describe the living state of Chinese Buddhism after the Sui and Tang dynasties lies in the development of Chinese Buddhism after the Sui and Tang dynasties and whether it has a very different situation from that of the six dynasties Buddhism. Secondly, whether the sectarian can generalize and explain this overall development trend. In order to understand the existence mode of Buddhist sectarian in Sui and Tang dynasties, we should take into account the process of Buddhist sectarian formation. The development of sectarian Buddhism was still in a period of construction in the Sui and Tang dynasties. In accordance with the development logic of Chinese Buddhism itself, the formation of Chinese Buddhist sectarian is a process of conflict and communication, in order to resolve the conflict and become the basic color of the development of Buddhist sectarian in Sui and Tang dynasties.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)政法大學(xué)人文學(xué)院哲學(xué)系;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金青年項(xiàng)目“中唐佛教宗派沖突和會(huì)通的思想史意義”階段性成果(06CZX015) 2011新世紀(jì)優(yōu)秀人才計(jì)劃“唐代儒佛關(guān)系研究”前期成果
【分類號(hào)】：B948;K241

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 石峻,方立天;論隋唐佛教宗派的形成[J];哲學(xué)研究;1981年08期

2 子君;隋唐時(shí)期形成的佛教宗派[J];華夏文化;1996年04期

3 祁生彥;;青海的佛教宗派[J];群文天地;2011年09期

4 no用彤;中國(guó)佛教宗派UO楲補(bǔ)娭[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué));1963年05期

5 謝重光;20世紀(jì)國(guó)內(nèi)對(duì)隋唐五代佛教宗派及其思想學(xué)說(shuō)研究之回顧[J];汕頭大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1999年04期

6 陳引馳;;柳宗元佛教宗派取向及背景分析[J];中國(guó)文學(xué)研究(輯刊);2008年01期

7 陳士強(qiáng);佛教宗派史上的譜系[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1991年01期

8 廣興;;斯里蘭卡的佛教宗派[J];法音;1992年10期

9 龍?jiān)魄?;梵凈山佛教宗派探析[J];銅仁師范高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào)(綜合版);2006年04期

10 楊箏;;興盛時(shí)期河洛佛教宗派述說(shuō)[J];洛陽(yáng)理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 黃耀X;;禪宗與對(duì)句[A];傳統(tǒng)中國(guó)研究集刊（第七輯）[C];2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 鄭凌予;中國(guó)佛教宗派對(duì)韓國(guó)佛教寺廟空間演變的影響[D];西南大學(xué);2012年

2 袁宏琳;關(guān)于鐮倉(cāng)期法皇的思想性考察[D];中山大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2492139