【摘要】： 遼夏關(guān)系史是宋代中國民族關(guān)系史的重要一頁。本文在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上，從以下三個(gè)問題入手對(duì)其重新進(jìn)行了討論。 第一個(gè)問題是遼朝與境內(nèi)黨項(xiàng)的關(guān)系。遼朝對(duì)黨項(xiàng)的經(jīng)營經(jīng)歷了述魯、太祖和太宗三個(gè)階段；遼朝對(duì)黨項(xiàng)的統(tǒng)治體制主要有兩種：部族制度和屬國制度；《遼史》中的“唐古”一詞來源于契丹語。第二個(gè)問題是遼夏政治關(guān)系的發(fā)展過程。其一，遼朝與定難軍的關(guān)系。遼朝與作為西夏王朝的前身一定難軍的關(guān)系不僅存在著敵對(duì)的一面，而且還存在著相互利用的一面。其二，遼朝對(duì)西夏的外交政策。隨著遼朝對(duì)外戰(zhàn)略重心的轉(zhuǎn)移，遼朝地的對(duì)夏政策可以分為扶夏制宋、束夏善宋、助夏和宋、聯(lián)夏滅金等四個(gè)階段。其三，西遼與西夏的關(guān)系。西遼與西夏在政治上是友好的，在經(jīng)濟(jì)上是互惠的。其四，遼夏關(guān)系對(duì)東西交通和貿(mào)易的影響。謀求對(duì)其西方鄰國的貿(mào)易和政治權(quán)益在遼朝對(duì)夏策略中占有重要的地位。第三個(gè)問題是遼朝對(duì)西夏的邊防機(jī)構(gòu)和通使制度�！哆|史》中關(guān)于遼朝對(duì)夏邊防機(jī)構(gòu)的記載是不準(zhǔn)確的。本文在對(duì)具體機(jī)構(gòu)逐一做出考察的基礎(chǔ)上，初步勾勒了遼朝對(duì)夏的邊防體系的完整形態(tài)。遼夏之間使節(jié)往來是頻繁的，為此，遼朝建立了一套以外交禮儀為核心的通使制度，它體現(xiàn)了雙方不對(duì)等的政治地位。 從遼夏關(guān)系的性質(zhì)來看，，10到12世紀(jì)的中國，在政治上并不是三國化(宋遼夏)的三足鼎立格局，而是南北朝化(宋遼)的兩強(qiáng)對(duì)峙格局。
[Abstract]:The history of Liao-Xia relations is an important page of the history of China's ethnic relations in Song Dynasty. On the basis of previous research, this paper re-discusses it from the following three issues. The first question is the relationship between the Liao Dynasty and the Party in the territory of China. The management of the party item in the Liao Dynasty experienced three stages: Shulu, Taizu and Taizong; the ruling system of the Liao Dynasty to the party item had two main types: the clan system and the state system; the term "Tang Ancient" in the History of Liao Dynasty originated from the Qidan language. The second question is the development process of the Liao-Xia political relations. First, the relationship between the Liao Dynasty and the army. The relationship between Liao Dynasty and the forerunner of Xixia Dynasty has not only hostile side, but also mutual utilization. Second, the foreign policy of Liao Dynasty to Xixia. With the shift of the foreign strategic center of the Liao Dynasty, the summer policy of the Liao Dynasty can be divided into four stages: supporting the Xia Song Dynasty, Bandang Xia Shan Song Dynasty, helping the Xia and Song Dynasty, and eliminating the gold in the Lianxia period. Third, the relationship between Western Liao and Xixia. Western Liao and Xixia are politically friendly and economically mutually beneficial. Fourthly, the influence of Liao-Xia relationship on east-west traffic and trade. Seeking for the trade and political rights and interests of its western neighbors played an important role in Liao Dynasty's strategy of summer. The third problem is the border defense agencies and communication system of the Liao Dynasty to the Xixia. The records of the frontier defense agencies of the Liao Dynasty against the Xia Dynasty are not accurate in the History of Liao Dynasty. On the basis of investigating the specific institutions one by one, this paper gives a preliminary outline of the complete form of the border defense system of Liao Dynasty to Xia. Envoys and envoys were frequent between Liao and Xia dynasties. Therefore, Liao Dynasty established a diplomatic etiquette-centered commissary system, which reflected the unequal political status of both sides. Judging from the nature of the Liao-Xia relationship, from the 10th to the 12th century, China was not the three-legged pattern of the three Kingdoms (Song and Liao-Xia), but the two-strong confrontation pattern of the Southern and Northern dynasties (Song-Liao).
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：K246

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 李浩楠;;金朝與西夏關(guān)系研究的幾個(gè)問題[J];西夏研究;2010年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王淑蘭;歷史地理視角下的遼代城市研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2011年

2 張?jiān)乒~;宋代外交思想研究[D];河南大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 辛鵬龍;遼代西京文化研究[D];長春師范學(xué)院;2010年

2 紀(jì)祥;遼朝對(duì)外遣使研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2013年

本文編號(hào)：2443759