本文選題：北宋 + 民族關(guān)系思想　； 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2011年博士論文

【摘要】：宋遼夏金時(shí)期,中國(guó)古代少數(shù)民族的發(fā)展進(jìn)入了一個(gè)嶄新的歷史時(shí)期。在這一時(shí)期,遼、夏、金等少數(shù)民族政權(quán)在政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化、思想意識(shí)等方面都有了長(zhǎng)足發(fā)展,漢族政權(quán)、少數(shù)民族政權(quán)一體化的趨勢(shì)日益增強(qiáng),北宋王朝面臨著空前的挑戰(zhàn)。為了應(yīng)對(duì)日益嚴(yán)重的民族矛盾,北宋統(tǒng)治集團(tuán)內(nèi)部就如何看待少數(shù)民族、如何處理與少數(shù)民族政權(quán)的關(guān)系、如何抵御少數(shù)民族的侵?jǐn)_等一系列問題進(jìn)行了理論上的思考與探索,形成了內(nèi)容豐富的民族關(guān)系思想,他們的思想不僅對(duì)當(dāng)時(shí)民族關(guān)系的發(fā)展產(chǎn)生了較大影響,而且在中國(guó)民族關(guān)系思想史上也占有極其重要的地位。全面梳理和系統(tǒng)研究這一時(shí)期的民族關(guān)系思想,既具有重要的學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值,也有較強(qiáng)的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本文在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上,充分利用歷史文獻(xiàn)資料,綜合運(yùn)用歷史學(xué)、民族學(xué)等多學(xué)科的理論與方法,對(duì)北宋各個(gè)時(shí)期各類歷史人物的民族關(guān)系思想進(jìn)行深入研究,基本理清了北宋民族關(guān)系思想發(fā)展的脈絡(luò),比較深入地探究了北宋民族關(guān)系思想的具體內(nèi)容。 論文包括緒論及三編、八章的內(nèi)容。其中緒論部分介紹了民族關(guān)系思想的相關(guān)研究概況、定義、理論框架及其研究現(xiàn)狀,并對(duì)本文的研究意義、研究思路、研究方法作了一些具體說明,最后指出了研究中的重點(diǎn)、難點(diǎn)和論文的不足之處。上編共分三章,分別闡述了宋太祖、宋太宗、宋真宗統(tǒng)治時(shí)期,宋太祖、宋太宗、宋真宗、張洎、王禹PA、田錫、李f 、李至、朱臺(tái)符、張齊賢、錢若水等人的民族關(guān)系思想,并對(duì)這一時(shí)期北宋統(tǒng)治集團(tuán)內(nèi)部關(guān)于靈州存廢問題的思想交鋒、宋初關(guān)于以貿(mào)易手段遏制“夷狄”入侵的思想進(jìn)行了初步探索。中編分為三章,分別對(duì)宋仁宗、宋英宗、宋神宗統(tǒng)治時(shí)期,宋仁宗、宋神宗、王安石、司馬光、范仲淹、富弼、歐陽修、王韶、孫覺等人民族關(guān)系思想的具體內(nèi)容、發(fā)展演變過程、影響以及時(shí)代價(jià)值做了較為深入的探討,并對(duì)宋仁宗至宋神宗統(tǒng)治時(shí)期形成的民族關(guān)系思想流派進(jìn)行了梳理和提煉。下編分為二章,重點(diǎn)對(duì)宋哲宗、宋徽宗、宋欽宗統(tǒng)治時(shí)期高太后、宋哲宗、宋徽宗、蘇轍、安堯臣等人的民族關(guān)系思想進(jìn)行了研究,對(duì)宋哲宗時(shí)期關(guān)于是否歸還西夏蘭州等地的大討論進(jìn)行了分析與闡述。
[Abstract]:During the Song, Liao and Jin dynasties, the development of ancient Chinese minorities entered a new historical period. During this period, the political, economic, cultural and ideological aspects of the political, economic, cultural, ideological and ideological regimes of the Liao, Xia, Jin and other ethnic minority regimes developed rapidly, and the trend of the integration of Han and minority regimes increased day by day. The Northern Song Dynasty faced unprecedented challenges. In order to deal with the increasingly serious ethnic contradictions, the Northern Song Dynasty ruling group on how to treat ethnic minorities, how to deal with the relationship with minority regimes, how to resist the invasion of ethnic minorities, and so on a series of theoretical thinking and exploration. They not only had a great influence on the development of national relations at that time, but also played an extremely important role in the history of Chinese national relations. It is not only of great academic value, but also of great practical significance to study the thought of ethnic relations in this period. On the basis of previous studies, this paper makes full use of historical documents and materials, synthesizes the theories and methods of history, ethnology, and so on, and makes an in-depth study of the national relations thought of various historical figures in each period of the Northern Song Dynasty. This paper clarifies the development of the thought of national relations in the Northern Song Dynasty, and probes into the concrete contents of the thought of the national relations in the Northern Song Dynasty. The paper includes introduction and three parts, eight chapters. The introduction part introduces the general situation, definition, theoretical framework and current research situation of the thought of ethnic relations, and makes some specific explanations on the significance, train of thought, research methods of this paper, and finally points out the key points in the research. Difficulties and shortcomings of the paper. The first part is divided into three chapters, respectively, describing the national relations thoughts of Song Taizu, Song Taizong, Song Zhenzong, Song Taizu, Song Taizong, Song Zhenzong, Zhang Ji, Wang Yu PAA, Tian Xi, Li f, Li Zhi, Zhu Taicu, Zhang Qixian, Qian Ruoshui, etc. At the same time, this period, the Northern Song Dynasty ruling group on the issue of the existence and abolition of Lingzhou thought confrontation, the early Song Dynasty on the use of trade means to curb the "Yi Di" invasion of the idea of a preliminary exploration. The middle part is divided into three chapters, including Song Renzong, Song Yingzong, Song Shenzong, Song Shenzong, Song Renzong, Song Shenzong, Wang Anshi, Si Maguang, Fan Zhongyan, Fu Bi, Ouyang Xiu, Wang Shao, Sun Jue, etc. The evolution process, influence and value of the times are discussed in depth, and the schools of thought of ethnic relations formed from Song Renzong to Song Shenzong's reign are sorted out and refined. The next part is divided into two chapters, focusing on the Song Che-zong, Song Huizong, Song Emperor Gao, Song Zhechong, Song Huizong, Su Ruo, Anyaochen and other people's national relations thought. This paper analyzes and expounds whether or not to return to Lanzhou and other places in the period of Song Zhe-zong.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：K244

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何忠禮,周方高;論司馬光民族觀的繼承性與創(chuàng)造性[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年04期

2 樂文華,陳小瓊,戴文君;論宋神宗與王安石的關(guān)系[J];撫州師專學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

3 陳大為;;論夏宋貿(mào)易對(duì)北宋的影響[J];開封大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

4 羅家祥;曾布與北宋哲宗、徽宗統(tǒng)治時(shí)期的政局演變[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年02期

5 崔明德;;中國(guó)民族關(guān)系思想史研究范圍和方法的探討[J];民族研究;2006年02期

6 陶玉坤;遼宋和盟狀態(tài)下的政治對(duì)抗[J];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文.社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年S1期

7 劉建麗;西夏與遼朝關(guān)系述論[J];遼寧大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年02期

8 龔留柱;“王者無外”和“夷夏之防”——秦漢時(shí)期邊疆思想論略[J];南都學(xué)壇;2000年04期

9 王曉波;宋太宗雍熙北伐失敗后的對(duì)遼策略[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年04期

10 周方高,薛治國(guó);關(guān)于司馬光民族觀的若干思考[J];史學(xué)史研究;2002年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王學(xué)艷;我國(guó)少數(shù)民族文獻(xiàn)研究的現(xiàn)狀與展望[D];東北師范大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2064788