本文選題：一帶一路 + 外國(guó)法查明�。� 參考：《上海財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)》2017年04期

【摘要】：外國(guó)法查明是國(guó)際私法中的一項(xiàng)特有的制度,是我國(guó)建設(shè)"一帶一路"進(jìn)程中準(zhǔn)確審理涉外民商事案件的基礎(chǔ),也是正確適用外國(guó)法的前提條件。這一制度的設(shè)置與司法實(shí)踐對(duì)于我國(guó)涉外民商事糾紛的合法合理解決、我國(guó)司法審判公信力的全面提升以及國(guó)際民商事交往良好環(huán)境的形成具有重大作用。目前,我國(guó)有關(guān)外國(guó)法查明制度存在分散化和碎片化的傾向,查明責(zé)任不夠清晰、具體,缺乏可操作性和實(shí)用性等,難以適應(yīng)現(xiàn)實(shí)情況的發(fā)展需求。因此,在"一帶一路"戰(zhàn)略大背景下,我國(guó)應(yīng)理所當(dāng)然地對(duì)外國(guó)法查明制度的立法進(jìn)行適當(dāng)?shù)恼虾蛥f(xié)調(diào),進(jìn)一步細(xì)化外國(guó)法查明的責(zé)任主體,對(duì)于當(dāng)事人和民間專業(yè)機(jī)構(gòu)查明的外國(guó)法是否準(zhǔn)確有賴于法官適用時(shí)行使自由裁量權(quán),而不必對(duì)其真實(shí)性或合法性承擔(dān)責(zé)任,積極拓展外國(guó)法的查明途徑,雙邊司法協(xié)助協(xié)定中增列專門針對(duì)外國(guó)法查明的規(guī)范,適時(shí)增加更多的查明中心,在立法上肯定查明途徑無(wú)需窮盡、明確查明期限并對(duì)于無(wú)法查明外國(guó)法做出靈活的處理等,從多個(gè)方面采取改進(jìn)措施以提升我國(guó)司法的國(guó)際影響力和公信力。
[Abstract]:Ascertaining foreign law is a special system in private international law. It is the basis of accurately handling foreign civil and commercial cases in the process of constructing "Belt and Road" in our country, and is also the precondition for the correct application of foreign law. The establishment and judicial practice of this system play an important role in the legal and reasonable settlement of civil and commercial disputes involving foreign countries, the overall promotion of judicial credibility in our country and the formation of a good environment for international civil and commercial exchanges. At present, there is a tendency of decentralization and fragmentation in the system of ascertaining foreign law in our country, and the responsibility of ascertaining is not clear enough, concrete, operational and practical, so it is difficult to adapt to the development needs of the actual situation. Therefore, under the background of "Belt and Road" strategy, our country should, of course, integrate and coordinate the legislation of foreign law ascertainment system, and further refine the subject of responsibility identified by foreign law. With regard to the accuracy of the foreign laws identified by the parties and private professional bodies, which depend on the exercise of discretion by judges when applicable, without having to bear responsibility for their authenticity or legality, and to actively expand the channels for the identification of foreign laws, The inclusion in bilateral mutual legal assistance agreements of norms specifically aimed at the identification of foreign law, the addition of additional identification centres in due course, the legislative certainty that the means of identification need not be exhausted, the clear identification period and the flexible treatment of foreign law that cannot be ascertained, etc., In order to enhance the international influence and credibility of our country's judicature, we should take improvement measures in many aspects.
【作者單位】： 上海對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D997

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張磊;外國(guó)法的查明之立法及司法問(wèn)題探析[J];法律適用;2003年Z1期

2 王克玉;;“外國(guó)法查明”中的定性與定量分析[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期

3 郭玉軍;;近年中國(guó)有關(guān)外國(guó)法查明與適用的理論與實(shí)踐[J];武大國(guó)際法評(píng)論;2007年02期

4 吳燕;;我國(guó)外國(guó)法查明中的缺陷及完善[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年05期

5 金波;朱慧君;;試論外國(guó)法證明的模式[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2008年09期

6 黃保勇;馬永梅;;外國(guó)法查明中外國(guó)法“事實(shí)說(shuō)”的質(zhì)疑[J];寧夏大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

7 潘晨子;;我國(guó)關(guān)于外國(guó)法查明規(guī)定探討[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2009年09期

8 李倩源;;試論外國(guó)法查明程序的立法構(gòu)建[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年18期

9 向明華;;論外國(guó)法查明責(zé)任的分配——兼涉外海事審判視角[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期

10 白龍;;外國(guó)法查明途徑探析[J];新西部(下半月);2009年07期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 鄭軍;;論我國(guó)外國(guó)法查明的責(zé)任主體[A];2008全國(guó)博士生學(xué)術(shù)論壇（國(guó)際法）論文集——國(guó)際公法、國(guó)際私法分冊(cè)[C];2008年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 ;外國(guó)法無(wú)法查明時(shí)，應(yīng)適用何種法律？[N];民營(yíng)經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2005年

2 許軍珂;審理涉外民商事案件時(shí)外國(guó)法的查明[N];人民法院報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉來(lái)平;外國(guó)法的查明比較研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 林民揚(yáng);論外國(guó)法查明不能[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

2 胡s，

本文編號(hào)：2086684