【摘要】：權(quán)威人格又稱為權(quán)力主義人格,它是由一組相互關(guān)聯(lián)的人格特征組成的人格類型。本研究把權(quán)力感定義為權(quán)力被激發(fā)或喚醒的心理狀態(tài)。最近,研究者開始關(guān)注權(quán)威人格與權(quán)力感的社會影響。隨著對權(quán)力感和道德思維研究的深入,一些學(xué)者開始關(guān)注權(quán)力感與道德思維方式的關(guān)系,發(fā)現(xiàn)在不同的權(quán)力感條件下,被試會有不同的道德思維方式。本研究以貴州某高校大學(xué)生為被試,通過在不同條件下對權(quán)力的操作來啟動被試的高權(quán)力感和低權(quán)力感,探討不同條件下的權(quán)力感被外部刺激喚起以后,個體權(quán)力感對道德思維的影響,以及在不同的條件下權(quán)威人格對道德思維方式的影響。通過四個實驗獲得如下結(jié)論: 1.被試做為非當(dāng)事人的條件下,不同權(quán)威主義分數(shù)的被試在不同的道德思維方式的選擇上沒有顯著的差異;高權(quán)力感的被試更傾向于規(guī)則為導(dǎo)向的道德思維方式,低權(quán)力感的被試更傾向于結(jié)果為導(dǎo)向的道德思維方式。 2.被試做為當(dāng)事人的條件下,不同權(quán)威主義分數(shù)的被試在不同的道德思維方式的選擇上沒有顯著的差異;高權(quán)力感的被試和低權(quán)力感的被試都更傾向于結(jié)果為導(dǎo)向的道德思維方式。 3.被試做為當(dāng)事人且道德判斷關(guān)系到其他人的生命的條件下,不同權(quán)威主義分數(shù)的被試在不同的道德思維方式的選擇上沒有顯著的差異;高權(quán)力感的被試更傾向于規(guī)則為導(dǎo)向的道德思維方式,低權(quán)力感的被試更傾向于結(jié)果為導(dǎo)向的道德思維方式。 4.被試做為當(dāng)事人且道德判斷關(guān)系自己利益的條件下,不同權(quán)威主義分數(shù)的被試在不同的道德思維方式的選擇上沒有顯著的差異;高權(quán)力感和低權(quán)力感的被試都更傾向于結(jié)果為導(dǎo)向的道德思維方式。
[Abstract]:Authoritative personality, also called authoritarian personality, is a type of personality composed of a group of interrelated personality characteristics. In this study, the sense of power is defined as the psychological state in which power is stimulated or awakened. Recently, researchers began to focus on the social impact of authoritative personality and sense of power. With the deepening of the research on the sense of power and moral thinking, some scholars began to pay attention to the relationship between the sense of power and the mode of moral thinking, and found that under different conditions of the sense of power, the subjects would have different ways of moral thinking. In this study, a college student in Guizhou province was taken as the subject. Through the operation of power under different conditions, the subjects' sense of high power and low power was initiated, and then the sense of power under different conditions was aroused by external stimuli. The influence of individual sense of power on moral thinking, and the influence of authoritative personality on moral thinking mode under different conditions. The following conclusions were obtained through four experiments: 1. The subjects with different authoritarianism scores had no significant difference in the choice of different moral ways of thinking under the condition that they were non-parties. The subjects with high power sense were more inclined to rule-oriented moral thinking mode, and those with low power sense tended to result-oriented moral thinking mode. 2. The subjects with different authoritarianism scores had no significant difference in the choice of different moral ways of thinking under the condition of being a party. Both high-power and low-power subjects tend to result-oriented moral thinking. 3. Under the condition that subjects are parties and moral judgment is related to the lives of others, there is no significant difference in the choice of different moral thinking modes among subjects with different authoritarianism scores. The subjects with high power sense were more inclined to rule-oriented moral thinking mode, and those with low power sense tended to result-oriented moral thinking mode. 4. Under the condition that subjects were parties and moral judgment related to their own interests, the subjects with different authoritarianism scores had no significant difference in the choice of different moral thinking modes; Both high-power and low-power subjects tended to result-oriented moral thinking.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B848

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 仲兵;劉愛芳;;對我國公務(wù)員權(quán)威人格的調(diào)查分析——以江蘇部分公務(wù)員為例[J];理論前沿;2009年24期

2 鄧善鳳;;權(quán)威主義人格研究的流觴[J];山西高等學(xué)校社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2013年04期

3 許文娟;;權(quán)力感對大學(xué)生道德思維方式的影響[J];社會心理科學(xué);2013年04期

4 李小平;楊晟宇;李夢遙;;權(quán)威人格與權(quán)力感對道德思維方式的影響[J];心理學(xué)報;2012年07期

5 韋慶旺;俞國良;;權(quán)力的社會認知研究述評[J];心理科學(xué)進展;2009年06期

6 孫英;權(quán)利義務(wù)新探[J];中國人民大學(xué)學(xué)報;1996年01期

7 段錦云;黃彩云;;個人權(quán)力感對進諫行為的影響機制:權(quán)力認知的視角[J];心理學(xué)報;2013年02期

8 鄭睦凡;趙俊華;;權(quán)力如何影響道德判斷行為:情境卷入的效應(yīng)[J];心理學(xué)報;2013年11期

，

本文編號：2433322