【摘要】：中國(guó)深受儒家文化影響,秉承“送人玫瑰,手有余香”,但“好面子”也是國(guó)人具有的特點(diǎn)之一。已有研究表明,相對(duì)于親自我支出(將金錢(qián)花費(fèi)在自己身上),親社會(huì)支出(將金錢(qián)花費(fèi)在他人身上)的個(gè)體會(huì)獲得更多的幸福感,但如果親社會(huì)支出背后具有不同的動(dòng)機(jī),又會(huì)產(chǎn)生怎樣的結(jié)果?本研究首次對(duì)自主性動(dòng)機(jī)與控制性動(dòng)機(jī)引發(fā)的的親社會(huì)支出是否對(duì)個(gè)體幸福感產(chǎn)生不同影響進(jìn)行探討(研究采用幸福感綜合指標(biāo),其中包括情緒變量,因此研究也將對(duì)積極、消極情緒進(jìn)行分析)。研究以大學(xué)生為被試,分3個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)具體實(shí)施。實(shí)驗(yàn)1,探究以往支出經(jīng)歷對(duì)個(gè)體幸福感、積極消極情緒的影響,并統(tǒng)計(jì)大學(xué)生中不同動(dòng)機(jī)(自主性動(dòng)機(jī)vs.控制性動(dòng)機(jī))的親社會(huì)支出占月總支出的比例。實(shí)驗(yàn)2,采用3(自主性親社會(huì)支出vs.控制性親社會(huì)支出vs.親自我支出)×2(￥20 vs.￥100)的被試間實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),探討自主性親社會(huì)支出和控制性親社會(huì)支出對(duì)支出者幸福感、積極消極情緒的影響,并觀察不同支出金額是否存在差異。實(shí)驗(yàn)3,通過(guò)被試進(jìn)行真實(shí)的支出行為,觀察自主性和控制性親社會(huì)支出的影響,并探討基本心理需要是否在支出方式和幸福感、積極消極情緒中起中介作用。研究結(jié)果表明:(1)與控制性親社會(huì)支出和親自我支出相比,自主性親社會(huì)支出能夠帶來(lái)更高水平的幸福感、更高的積極情緒,更少的消極情緒,并不受支出金額的影響;(2)大學(xué)生自主性親社會(huì)支出的比例(12%)要高于控制性親社會(huì)支出(7.6%);(3)基本心理需要在支出分組與幸福感之間起完全中介作用。應(yīng)鼓勵(lì)大學(xué)生多進(jìn)行親社會(huì)支出(如,慈善捐助等),積極培養(yǎng)其自主、自愿支出的精神,使其擁有更高水平的幸福感并促進(jìn)身心健康更好的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:China is deeply influenced by Confucian culture, adhering to "give roses, hands have fragrance," but "good face" is also one of the characteristics of the people. Previous studies have shown that individuals who spend their own money (spending money on themselves) have more happiness than individuals who spend money on others, but if there are different motivations behind pro-social spending, And what will happen? This study is for the first time to explore whether the pro-social expenditure caused by autonomous motivation and controlling motivation has different effects on individual well-being. (the study uses comprehensive indicators of well-being, including emotional variables, so the study will also be positive. Analysis of negative emotions The study was carried out in 3 experiments with college students as subjects. Experiment 1, explore the influence of past expenditure experience on individual happiness, positive and negative emotions, and calculate the different motivation (vs.) among college students. Controlling motivation) the proportion of pro-social expenditure to total monthly expenditure. Experiment 2, using 3 (autonomous pro-social spending vs.) Controlled pro-social expenditure vs. The experimental design of 20 vs.100 脳 2 was designed to explore the effects of autonomous pro-social expenditure and controlled pro-social expenditure on the well-being and positive and negative emotions of the payers, and to observe whether there were differences in different amounts of expenditure. In experiment 3, we observed the influence of autonomy and controlling prosocial expenditure through real spending behavior, and explored whether the basic psychological needs played an intermediary role in the way of expenditure and well-being, and positive and negative emotions. The results show that: (1) compared with controlling pro-social expenditure and personal expenditure, autonomous pro-social expenditure can bring a higher level of happiness, higher positive emotion, less negative emotion, and is not affected by the amount of expenditure; (2) the proportion of college students' autonomous pro-social expenditure (12%) was higher than that of controlled pro-social expenditure (7.6%); (3). The basic psychological needs played a complete intermediary role between expenditure grouping and well-being. College students should be encouraged to make more pro-social expenditure (such as charitable donations), actively cultivate the spirit of their own, voluntary spending, make them have a higher level of happiness and promote better physical and mental health development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B844.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 楊瑩;寇_g;;親社會(huì)互動(dòng)中的幸福感:自主性的作用[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2015年07期

2 張景煥;劉桂榮;師瑋瑋;付秀君;;動(dòng)機(jī)的激發(fā)與小學(xué)生創(chuàng)造思維的關(guān)系:自主性動(dòng)機(jī)的中介作用[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2011年10期

3 劉麗虹;張積家;;動(dòng)機(jī)的自我決定理論及其應(yīng)用[J];華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

4 熊承清;許遠(yuǎn)理;;生活滿意度量表中文版在民眾中使用的信度和效度[J];中國(guó)健康心理學(xué)雜志;2009年08期

5 徐偉;李朝旭;韓仁生;;友誼的結(jié)構(gòu)研究——一項(xiàng)對(duì)大學(xué)生友誼內(nèi)隱觀的調(diào)查研究[J];心理科學(xué);2006年05期

6 張衛(wèi)東,刁靜,Constance J.Schick;正、負(fù)性情緒的跨文化心理測(cè)量:PANAS維度結(jié)構(gòu)檢驗(yàn)[J];心理科學(xué);2004年01期

7 黃麗,楊廷忠,季忠民;正性負(fù)性情緒量表的中國(guó)人群適用性研究[J];中國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2003年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李清華;高中生基本心理需要的滿足與幸福感的關(guān)系[D];河北大學(xué);2009年

2 潘仲君;情緒對(duì)個(gè)體創(chuàng)造性思維的影響研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年

3 李彤;親社會(huì)花費(fèi)對(duì)幸福感的影響：人際親密度的邊界作用[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2421894