【摘要】：情緒標(biāo)注(affect labeling)是指?jìng)�(gè)體使用情緒詞對(duì)情緒刺激或由其誘發(fā)的情緒進(jìn)行描述。阻斷理論(disruption theory)認(rèn)為,對(duì)情緒的反思會(huì)抑制內(nèi)隱的或自動(dòng)化的情緒反應(yīng),進(jìn)而表現(xiàn)出對(duì)情緒的抑制,其強(qiáng)調(diào)的是能引起人們反思這些情緒過程的情緒詞均能抑制情緒,反之,則不能抑制情緒。與使用情緒性形容詞(如憤怒,愉快)進(jìn)行標(biāo)注相比,使用情緒性名詞(如蜘蛛,花朵)進(jìn)行標(biāo)注不能直接引起人們對(duì)情緒的反思,根據(jù)該理論可推斷使用情緒名詞進(jìn)行標(biāo)注不能抑制情緒。本研究基于以往情緒標(biāo)注的相關(guān)研究上,進(jìn)行實(shí)驗(yàn)來考察使用情緒性名詞為標(biāo)注詞進(jìn)行標(biāo)注對(duì)正負(fù)性情緒的影響,故本研究所要達(dá)到的目的是:(1)探討使用情緒性名詞進(jìn)行標(biāo)注能否抑制情緒;(2)使用情緒性名詞進(jìn)行標(biāo)注時(shí)情緒強(qiáng)度的動(dòng)態(tài)變化過程。本研究采用經(jīng)典的情緒標(biāo)注研究范式,結(jié)合時(shí)間精確度高的事件相關(guān)電位技術(shù),對(duì)大學(xué)生在使用情緒性名詞進(jìn)行標(biāo)注的過程中的LPP波幅進(jìn)行分析,揭示使用情緒性名詞進(jìn)行標(biāo)注能否抑制情緒。實(shí)驗(yàn)材料選自國(guó)際情緒圖片系統(tǒng)(IAPS)和中國(guó)情緒材料情感圖片系統(tǒng)(CAPS)。本實(shí)驗(yàn)已選用15名大學(xué)生被試,采用2(情緒類型:正性、負(fù)性)×2(標(biāo)注類型:情緒標(biāo)注、非情緒標(biāo)注)的被試內(nèi)實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),記錄被試的行為數(shù)據(jù)以及情緒判斷階段的LPP波幅和命名階段的LPP波幅。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn):在情緒判斷階段,負(fù)性情緒下,情緒標(biāo)注與非情緒標(biāo)注任務(wù)下的LPP波幅沒有顯著差異;而正性情緒下,情緒標(biāo)注的LPP波幅顯著低于非情緒標(biāo)注的LPP波幅;在命名階段,無論是正性情緒還是負(fù)性情緒,情緒標(biāo)注任務(wù)的LPP波幅均高于非情緒標(biāo)注的。結(jié)論:使用情緒性名詞進(jìn)行標(biāo)注,(1)對(duì)正性情緒而言先在情緒判斷階段抑制了情緒,后在命名階段增強(qiáng)了情緒;(2)對(duì)負(fù)性情緒而言,在判斷階段沒有對(duì)情緒產(chǎn)生明顯影響,但在命名后增強(qiáng)了情緒;(3)無論正性情緒還是負(fù)性情緒其增強(qiáng)過程均發(fā)生在對(duì)情緒進(jìn)行命名之后。
[Abstract]:Emotion-tagging (affect labeling) refers to the use of emotion words to describe emotional stimuli or emotions induced by them. According to the blocking theory (disruption theory), introspection of emotion can inhibit implicit or automatic emotional response, and then show inhibition of emotion, which emphasizes that emotion words that can cause people to reflect on these processes of emotion can suppress emotion, whereas the other way around, You can't suppress your emotions. Compared with the use of emotive adjectives (such as anger, pleasure), the use of emotional nouns (such as spiders, flowers) does not directly cause people to reflect on their emotions. According to this theory, it can be inferred that tagging with emotional nouns can not suppress emotion. Based on the previous researches on emotional tagging, this study investigates the effect of emotive nouns on positive and negative emotions by using emotive nouns as tagging words. Therefore, the purpose of this study is: (1) to explore whether the use of emotive nouns can suppress emotion; (2) the dynamic change process of emotional intensity when tagging with emotional nouns. In this study, the classic emotional tagging paradigm and event-related potentials with high time accuracy were used to analyze the LPP amplitude of college students in the process of emotive noun tagging. To reveal whether the use of emotive nouns can suppress emotions. The experimental materials were selected from the international emotional picture system (IAPS) and the Chinese emotional material image system (CAPS). In this experiment, 15 college students were enrolled in this study. The subjects were designed with 2 (emotion type: positive, negative) 脳 2 (tagging type: emotional tagging, non-emotional tagging). The behavioral data and LPP amplitude in emotional judgment stage and LPP amplitude in naming stage were recorded. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the amplitude of LPP between emotional tagging and non-emotional tagging tasks in negative emotions, while in positive emotions, the LPP amplitude of emotion-tagging was significantly lower than that of non-emotion-tagged LPP. In the naming stage, the LPP amplitude of emotion-tagging tasks was higher than that of non-emotion-tagged tasks, both positive and negative. Conclusion: emotional nouns are used to label: (1) for positive emotions, emotion is restrained in the stage of emotional judgment, and then enhanced in the naming stage; (2) for the negative emotion, there was no obvious effect on the emotion in the judgment stage, but the emotion was enhanced after naming; (3) the enhancement process of both positive and negative emotions occurred after the naming of the emotion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：信陽師范學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B842.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 岳鵬飛;杜婉婉;白學(xué)軍;許遠(yuǎn)理;;內(nèi)、外部情緒標(biāo)注對(duì)情緒作用的ERPs研究[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2016年06期

2 岳鵬飛;杜婉婉;白學(xué)軍;許遠(yuǎn)理;;情緒標(biāo)注對(duì)情緒的抑制發(fā)生在何時(shí):一項(xiàng)ERPs研究[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2015年09期

3 郭晶晶;呂錦程;;語言標(biāo)識(shí)對(duì)情緒體驗(yàn)的影響[J];心理科學(xué);2014年06期

4 黃月勝;張豹;黨曉姣;陳雪軍;鄭希付;;PTSD個(gè)體對(duì)創(chuàng)傷相關(guān)刺激的情緒標(biāo)識(shí)效應(yīng)研究[J];心理科學(xué);2013年06期

5 岳鵬飛;白學(xué)軍;;主觀報(bào)告下情緒標(biāo)注對(duì)正負(fù)性情緒的作用[J];信陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年06期

6 鄧歡;江琦;馬靜;紀(jì)婷婷;朱夢(mèng)音;;大學(xué)生情緒標(biāo)簽與性別標(biāo)簽加工時(shí)程差異的事件相關(guān)電位研究[J];中國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2013年10期

7 白學(xué)軍;岳鵬飛;;情緒標(biāo)注對(duì)負(fù)性情緒的抑制:來自自主神經(jīng)活動(dòng)的證據(jù)[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2013年07期

8 崔芳;羅躍嘉;;不同共情能力個(gè)體加工情緒面孔的ERP研究[J];中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2009年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 岳鵬飛;客觀情緒標(biāo)注對(duì)正負(fù)性情緒的作用研究[D];天津師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2399164