自主欺騙在意圖與反饋加工階段的電生理機(jī)制
[Abstract]:Deception is a psychological process in which individuals deliberately manipulate others' false beliefs through verbal or non-verbal actions. In contrast to demand deception, self-deception refers to the active deceptive behavior of individuals induced by certain interests. Most researches on autonomous deception are motivated by money. The present situation of cheating research mainly includes the following three points: first, the current index of electrophysiological lie detection is mainly P300 in the stage of intent of deception, but it has a certain probability that honesty will be misjudged as deception (Cui Xi, Zhang Qinglin, 2013; Gao Junfeng et al.,2014, whose effectiveness in polygraph detection has been questioned by some researchers; Secondly, because the cheating needs to face the consequences in the real situation, the feedback stage of deception is a part of the cheating process, and the evaluation of the result of feedback information has an important impact on the adjustment of deception strategy in the interactive process (Sip et al.,2008). Therefore, recent studies have focused on the feedback stage of cheating behavior. P300 and FRN are the two main components of ERP in the feedback phase. Third, deception may have a practice effect. The information concealment paradigm that simulates the undercover situation has found that deception can be practiced (Chen Hao, 2013). Brain imaging studies have found that the adaptation of the brain to autonomic deception occurs in the amygdala (Garrett et al.,2016). To sum up, this study improves the research paradigm, induces autonomous deception, and probes into the intention of deception and the electrophysiological mechanism in the feedback stage. The study used event-related potential (event-related potentials,ERP) technique to repeat the experiment with two experiments. In experiment 1, money reward was used (31 cases), and time reward was used in experiment 2 (32 cases). The task combined the spoofing feedback paradigm of point distribution judgment task (MazarZhong,2010) and Fang et al. (2003). The results showed that there were three types of induced information (high and low reward). There are three types of feedback information (honesty, deceptive success, cheating failure), and 480 formal experiments are conducted. The P300 after the presentation of induced information (deceptive intention phase) was repeated by 2 (induced conditions: low reward, high reward) 脳 2 (response: honesty, deception) repeated measurement of ANOVA, The repeated measurement of variance analysis of P300 and FRN in the feedback stage (after the feedback information is presented) 2 (inductive conditions: low reward, high reward) 脳 3 (feedback: honesty, success of deception, failure of deception) was carried out. The results showed that: (1) in experiment 1, For P300 of deceptive intention, the main effect of response was not significant, and there was no significant difference between honesty and deception. In experiment 2, the main effect of response was significant. (2) for the stage of cheating feedback, the main effect of feedback was significant, the amplitude of feedback of cheating failure was the highest, the amplitude of feedback of honest feedback was the lowest, and the results of the two experiments were consistent. (3) for the average amplitude of FRN in the feedback stage, the main effect of feedback is significant, which can distinguish honesty from deception; For the peak amplitude of FRN in feedback stage, the difference between honest and deceptive success feedback is not significant, but the difference between honest and cheating failure feedback is significant. The conclusions are as follows: (1) the P300 of deception intention stage is not a stable lie detection index; (2) the P300 of cheating feedback stage is an effective lie detection index; (3) the average amplitude of FRN in the feedback stage is an effective lie detection index; FRN's peak amplitude does not distinguish between honesty and deception.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廣州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:B845
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條
1 劉耀中;張建良;竇凱;;結(jié)果評價中自我體驗與替代體驗的參照點(diǎn)效應(yīng):一項賭博游戲的ERPs研究[J];心理科學(xué);2015年05期
2 卜令章;劉洪廣;;事件相關(guān)電位測謊技術(shù)原理探析[J];心理技術(shù)與應(yīng)用;2015年02期
3 崔茜;雷旭;楊文靜;王一峰;張慶林;;有無反饋對欺騙過程的神經(jīng)機(jī)制的調(diào)控作用[J];中國科學(xué):生命科學(xué);2014年09期
4 高軍峰;張文佳;楊勇;胡佳佳;陶春毅;官金安;;基于P300和極限學(xué)習(xí)機(jī)的腦電測謊研究[J];電子科技大學(xué)學(xué)報;2014年02期
5 竇煒;曲璐璐;曲琛;;社會比較對合作任務(wù)結(jié)果評價的影響:來自ERP的證據(jù)[J];心理學(xué)報;2014年03期
6 崔茜;張慶林;;測謊中反饋加工的認(rèn)知神經(jīng)機(jī)制:一項ERP研究[J];心理科學(xué);2013年01期
7 崔茜;張慶林;邱江;劉強(qiáng);杜秀敏;阮小林;;P300和CNV在GKT的延時反應(yīng)范式中測謊效果的分離[J];心理學(xué)報;2009年04期
8 孫世月;羅躍嘉;;欺騙任務(wù)中結(jié)果評價的FN效應(yīng)[J];心理學(xué)報;2008年06期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 丁曉攀;欺騙行為的發(fā)展及其社會認(rèn)知神經(jīng)機(jī)制[D];華東師范大學(xué);2012年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條
1 釋磊;基于P300和CNV結(jié)合的測謊研究[D];杭州師范大學(xué);2016年
2 劉佩龍;互動情景下欺騙的神經(jīng)機(jī)制初探[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2015年
3 林曉虹;說謊反饋的神經(jīng)機(jī)制研究[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2014年
4 陳昊;說謊的練習(xí)效應(yīng)、模擬犯罪情境下的說謊與坦白研究[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2013年
5 胡曉晴;對個人信息誠實、說謊及其練習(xí)效應(yīng)的ERP研究[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2009年
,本文編號:2324810
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2324810.html