【摘要】：目的：探討特質(zhì)共情與內(nèi)隱攻擊性的相互關(guān)系,以及狀態(tài)共情對(duì)內(nèi)隱攻擊性的影響。 方法：研究共分兩個(gè)部分,研究一為相關(guān)研究,使用IRI人際指針問卷和IAT內(nèi)隱聯(lián)想測(cè)驗(yàn)分別測(cè)量特質(zhì)共情和內(nèi)隱攻擊性。76名被試按順序完成IRI問卷、IAT測(cè)驗(yàn)程序(依次為評(píng)價(jià)型和自我型),對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行相關(guān)分析；研究二為實(shí)驗(yàn)研究,采用2×2被試間設(shè)計(jì),自變量為性別和狀態(tài)共情的程度,運(yùn)用自編的狀態(tài)共情誘發(fā)材料和Boston的共情反應(yīng)量表誘發(fā)并評(píng)估個(gè)體的狀態(tài)共情水平,因變量為個(gè)體的內(nèi)隱攻擊性,評(píng)估方式同研究一。65名被試參加實(shí)驗(yàn),其中高共情組34人,男生女生各17人,低共情組31人,男生17人,女生14人,高低共情組分別接受高低狀態(tài)共情材料處理,而后完成操作檢驗(yàn)量表和共情反應(yīng)量表,最后依次完成IAT測(cè)驗(yàn)程序,對(duì)所得數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行方差分析。 結(jié)果：(1)男女生均具有較強(qiáng)的評(píng)價(jià)型內(nèi)隱攻擊性,男生的評(píng)價(jià)型內(nèi)隱攻擊性顯著高于女生；男生的情感共情顯著低于女生,主要體現(xiàn)在共情關(guān)注維度；(2)在評(píng)價(jià)型內(nèi)隱攻擊性上,男生的認(rèn)知共情與其存在顯著負(fù)相關(guān)(r=-0.380,p0.05),主要體現(xiàn)在想象維度(r=-0.376,p0.05)；女生的情感共情與其存在顯著負(fù)相關(guān)(r=-0.419,p0.05),主要體現(xiàn)在共情關(guān)注維度(r=-0.398,p0.05),女生的認(rèn)知共情與其存在極顯著負(fù)相關(guān)(r=-0.439,p0.01),主要體現(xiàn)在觀點(diǎn)采擇維度(r=-0.364,p0.05)；在自我型內(nèi)隱攻擊性上,女生的認(rèn)知共情(r=-0.359,p0.05)、情感共情中的共情關(guān)注維度(r=-0.359,p0.05)與其存在顯著負(fù)相關(guān)。(3)在評(píng)價(jià)型內(nèi)隱攻擊性上,狀態(tài)共情的主效應(yīng)顯著[F(1,63)=4.89,p=0.03],對(duì)自我型內(nèi)隱攻擊性則沒有影響。 結(jié)論：(1)在校男女生都表現(xiàn)出較強(qiáng)的評(píng)價(jià)型內(nèi)隱攻擊性,而自我型攻擊性則普遍較弱。(2)男生的評(píng)價(jià)型內(nèi)隱攻擊性要強(qiáng)于女生,女生的情感共情要顯著高于男生。(3)整體上看,特質(zhì)共情與內(nèi)隱攻擊性存在負(fù)向共變趨勢(shì),這種負(fù)相關(guān)程度在女性身上體現(xiàn)得更為明顯；從共情成分上看,認(rèn)知共情和情感共情都與內(nèi)隱攻擊性存在顯著負(fù)相關(guān),但認(rèn)知共情更為明顯；(4)狀態(tài)共情的程度會(huì)顯著影響評(píng)價(jià)型內(nèi)隱攻擊性,對(duì)自我型內(nèi)隱攻擊性則影響并不明顯。
[Abstract]:Aim: to investigate the relationship between trait empathy and implicit aggression and the effect of state empathy on implicit aggression. Methods: the study was divided into two parts. IRI interpersonal pointer questionnaire and IAT implicit association test were used to measure the trait empathy and implicit aggression. 76 subjects completed the IRI questionnaire in order (evaluation type and self type), and the data were analyzed. The second study was an experimental study, which was designed by 2 脳 2 subjects. The independent variables were sex and the degree of state empathy. The state empathy level was induced and evaluated by using the self-designed state empathy inducing material and Boston's empathy response scale. The dependent variable was the implicit aggression of the individual. The evaluation method was the same as that in the study. There were 34 subjects in the high empathy group, 17 boys and girls, 31 boys, 17 boys and 14 girls. The high and low empathy group were treated with high and low state empathic materials, then the operation test scale and the empathy response scale were completed. Finally, the IAT test program was completed in turn, and the data were analyzed by ANOVA. Results: (1) male and female students had strong implicit aggression of evaluation type, the implicit aggression of evaluation type of boys was significantly higher than that of girls, the emotional empathy of boys was significantly lower than that of girls, which was mainly reflected in the dimension of empathy concern; (2) in the evaluation implicit aggression, there was a significant negative correlation between the cognitive empathy of boys and their cognitive empathy (r-0.380, p0.05), mainly in the imaginary dimension (r-0.376p0.05); There was a significant negative correlation between the emotional empathy of female students and their emotional empathy (r-0.419 / p0.05), mainly in the dimension of empathy (r-0.398p0.05), and in the cognitive empathy of girls (r-0.439p0.01), mainly in the dimensionality of viewpoint taking (r-0.364p0.05), in the implicit aggression within self-type, in the cognitive empathy of female students. The cognitive empathy of female students (r-0.359p0.05) and the dimension of empathy concern (r-0.359p0.05) were negatively correlated with them. (3) in the evaluation of implicit aggression, the main effect of state empathy was significant [F (1 / 63) 4.89p0.03], but had no effect on the implicit aggression of self type. Conclusion: (1) male and female students in school showed strong implicit aggression of evaluation type, while the aggression of self-type was generally weaker. (2) the implicit aggression of evaluation type of boys was stronger than that of girls, and the emotional empathy of girls was significantly higher than that of boys. (3) on the whole, the emotional empathy of male students was significantly higher than that of male students. There is a negative covariant trend between trait empathy and implicit aggression, which is more obvious in women, and cognitive empathy and emotional empathy have significant negative correlation with implicit aggression. But cognitive empathy is more obvious; (4) the degree of state empathy will significantly affect the implicit aggression of evaluation type, but the effect on implicit aggression of self-type is not obvious.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B842

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 方從慧;;內(nèi)隱攻擊性研究進(jìn)展[J];四川職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

2 徐大真,楊治良;內(nèi)隱社會(huì)認(rèn)知中攻擊性行為的性別差異研究[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年04期

3 楊治良;;內(nèi)隱攻擊性與同情的關(guān)系研究[J];寧波大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2008年06期

4 常莉;于珊珊;李宏;;媒體中暴力信息對(duì)青少年攻擊性影響研究綜述[J];科技信息;2012年35期

5 趙晶;蔣寒;;高中生閾下啟動(dòng)內(nèi)隱攻擊性研究[J];青少年研究(山東省團(tuán)校學(xué)報(bào));2009年06期

6 翁娟;周路平;;共情的神經(jīng)機(jī)制[J];社會(huì)心理科學(xué);2010年05期

7 吳倩;;內(nèi)隱攻擊性的研究綜述[J];社會(huì)心理科學(xué);2011年Z2期

8 方曉義,林丹華,孫莉,房超;親子溝通類型與青少年社會(huì)適應(yīng)的關(guān)系[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2004年01期

9 杜紅梅,馮維;移情與后果認(rèn)知訓(xùn)練對(duì)兒童欺負(fù)行為影響的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2005年02期

10 魏華;張叢麗;周宗奎;金瓊;田媛;;媒體暴力對(duì)大學(xué)生攻擊性的長(zhǎng)時(shí)效應(yīng)和短時(shí)效應(yīng)[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2010年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2172024