本文選題：習慣性情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略 + 表達抑制策略��； 參考：《江西師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：危機決策是危機事件的關鍵環(huán)節(jié),而每當遇到危機事件個體都會覺得束手無策無從應對�，F(xiàn)如今對危機決策的研究重點主要集中于組織層面對危機事件應對策略的討論上,較少研究者探索影響危機決策的個體因素。危機情境中,當負性情緒喚醒時,情緒調(diào)節(jié)即刻開始。當人們在日常生活中使用某一種情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略形成習慣時,我們稱這種情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略為習慣性情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略。本研究中,采用問卷和實驗相結(jié)合的方法,討論習慣性情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略對危機決策質(zhì)量的影響作用,主要從危機決策時間、產(chǎn)生新方案率即危機決策有效性評價三方面進行分析研究。實驗一主要目的是檢驗Gross編制的習慣性情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略問卷對我國大學生的適用性。探索性因素分析顯示,中文版的習慣性情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略問卷具有兩個維度,包括認知重評策略維度和表達抑制策略維度,與Gross的問卷維度一致;驗證性因素分析顯示模型的RMSEA(0.078)0.08、NNFI(0.90)和CFI(0.92)≥0.09,SPSS 21分析顯示該問卷的內(nèi)部一致性系數(shù)為.638。表明該問卷具有良好的結(jié)構(gòu)效度和信度,對我國大學生群體具有良好的適用性。實驗二中采用問卷和實驗相結(jié)合的方法,目的是研究情緒變量和習慣性情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略變量對危機決策質(zhì)量的影響。研究結(jié)果顯示:在危機決策時間變量上,情緒(F=15.559,p=0.000)和習慣性情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略變量(F=4.234,p=0.042)主效應顯著,且二者存在顯著交互作用(F=6.977,p=0.009);在新方案產(chǎn)生率變量上,情緒(F=5.403,p=0.022)和習慣性情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略變量(F=4.086,p=0.045)主效應仍顯著,兩變量之間仍存在顯著地交互作用(F=6.384,p=0.013);在有效性變量上,習慣性情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略存在主效應(F=6.234,p=0.014)。主體的危機決策質(zhì)量不僅受到自身情緒因素的影響,也會受到環(huán)境因素的影響。實驗三主要目的是研究危機程度和習慣性情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略對危機決策質(zhì)量的影響。實驗方法同實驗二一致。實驗結(jié)果顯示:在危機決策時間變量上,危機程度(F=11.105,p=0.001)和習慣性情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略變量(F=5.441,p=0.021)主效應顯著,且二者存在顯著交互作用(F=4.757,p=0.031);在新方案產(chǎn)生率變量上,危機程度(F=4.324,p=0.040)主效應顯著,危機程度和習慣性情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略兩變量之間存在顯著交互作用(F=6.360,p=0.013);在有效性變量上,習慣性情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略仍存在主效應(F=7.437,p=0.007)�？偨Y(jié)論:(1)中文版的習慣性情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略問卷對我國大學生具有一定的適應性;(2)當個體處于負性情緒狀態(tài)時,習慣性使用表達抑制策略組危機決策時間較長,產(chǎn)生新方案率較少。在有效性評價指標上,習慣性使用認知重評策略組被試對危機決策方法的有效性評價較高;(3)當危機程度較大時,習慣性使用表達抑制策略個體的危機決策時間較長,產(chǎn)生新方案率同樣也較少。習慣性情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略在有效性評價指標上存在主效應。綜上,危機情境中,習慣性使用認知重評策略的個體危機決策質(zhì)量優(yōu)于習慣性使用表達抑制策略的個體。
[Abstract]:Crisis decision-making is the key link of crisis events, and when individuals encounter crisis events, they feel helpless and helpless. Now the focus of research on crisis decision is mainly focused on the discussion of the coping strategies of crisis events, and fewer researchers explore the individual factors that affect the decision-making of dangerous machines. When emotional arousal is aroused, emotional regulation begins immediately. When people use an emotional adjustment strategy in daily life, we call this emotional adjustment strategy a customary emotional adjustment strategy. In this study, a combination of questionnaires and experiments was used to discuss the influence of customary emotional adjustment strategies on the quality of crisis decision. The main purpose of the experiment is to examine the applicability of the customary emotional adjustment strategy questionnaire compiled by Gross to the college students in the three aspects of the crisis decision time, namely, the new scheme rate, that is, the evaluation of the effectiveness of the crisis decision. The two dimensions, including the cognitive reassessment strategy dimension and the expression inhibition strategy dimension, were consistent with the questionnaire dimension of Gross, and the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model was RMSEA (0.078) 0.08, NNFI (0.90) and CFI (0.92) > 0.09. SPSS 21 analysis showed that the internal consistency of the questionnaire was.638., which showed that the questionnaire had good structural validity and reliability, and The group of college students in China has a good applicability. In the second experiment, a combination of questionnaires and experiments is used to study the influence of emotional variables and customary emotional adjustment strategy variables on the quality of crisis decision. The results show that in the time variable of crisis decision, F=15.559, p=0.000 and customary emotion regulation strategy change. The main effect of F=4.234 (p=0.042) was significant, and the two had significant interaction (F=6.977, p=0.009). On the new scheme generation rate variables, the main effect of mood (F=5.403, p=0.022) and customary emotion regulation (F=4.086, p=0.045) was still significant, and there was still significant interaction between the two variables (F=6.384, p=0.013), and on the effectiveness variable, There is F=6.234 (p=0.014). The quality of crisis decision is not only influenced by its own emotional factors, but also influenced by environmental factors. The main purpose of experiment three is to study the effect of crisis degree and customary emotion regulation strategy on the quality of crisis decision. The experimental method is consistent with experiment two. The results showed that the main effect of F=11.105 (p=0.001) and F=5.441 (p=0.021) was significant in the time variable of crisis decision, and the two had significant interaction (F=4.757, p=0.031). On the new scheme production rate variable, the main effect of crisis degree (F=4.324, p=0.040) was significant, crisis degree and habit. There was a significant interaction between the two variables of the emotional regulation strategy (F=6.360, p=0.013); on the effectiveness variables, the customary emotion regulation strategy still had the main effect (F=7.437, p=0.007). (1) the Chinese version of the customary emotional adjustment strategy had a certain adaptability to Chinese college students; (2) the individual was in negative emotional state. At the time, the habit of using expression inhibition strategy group has a long time of crisis decision making and less new scheme rate. On the effectiveness evaluation index, the habit of using cognitive reevaluation strategy group has higher evaluation on the effectiveness of the crisis decision method. (3) when the crisis degree is large, the customary use of the individuals expressing the suppression strategy is better than the crisis decision time. In a comprehensive way, the quality of individual crisis decision making used by habitual use of cognitive reassessment strategy is better than that of the individuals who use the habit expression inhibition strategy in the crisis situation.
【學位授予單位】：江西師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B842.6

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 雷婷;楊乃定;;突發(fā)事件中時間壓力和情緒調(diào)節(jié)對框架效應的影響[J];中國安全科學學報;2016年10期

2 王曉利;;情緒和情緒調(diào)節(jié)對風險決策的影響及其神經(jīng)基礎[J];心理技術(shù)與應用;2016年02期

3 陳婷婷;;情緒對決策影響的研究進展[J];社會心理科學;2015年10期

4 姜嘉林;宋永超;;情緒對危機決策的影響研究[J];理論觀察;2014年09期

5 張濱熠;;構(gòu)建危機領導者壓力管理全過程模式的思考[J];領導科學;2014年16期

6 王光榮;朱凡鈺;;情緒、性別和方案數(shù)量對危機決策的影響[J];心理科學;2013年01期

7 李娜;馬偉娜;;習慣性情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略的研究概述[J];健康研究;2011年05期

8 李娜;;Gross情緒調(diào)節(jié)模型及對心理健康的影響[J];社會心理科學;2010年03期

9 靳霄;鄧光輝;經(jīng)e，

本文編號：2091549