本文選題：中日兩國 + 大學生�。� 參考：《山西醫(yī)科大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的:本研究以200名日本國在校大學生以及3060名中國在校大學生為對象，通過CTQ-SF對其兒童期虐待與忽視狀況進行篩查，從而探討兒童期虐待與忽視經(jīng)歷與其心理行為之間的關(guān)系，并進行對比研究。 方法:2013年7月15日，在日本某大學健康開發(fā)、看護、理學療法，作業(yè)療法四個學科中隨機抽取在校大學生200名，在山西某大學大一新生心理健康普查期間以3060名大一新生為調(diào)查對象，采用CTQ-SF兒童期虐待問卷、SES自尊量表、青少年健康危險行為量表以及MHT心理健康診斷測驗進行調(diào)查。 結(jié)果: 1.中日兩國大學生自尊心SES總得分與忽視及虐待均呈負相關(guān)，自尊心水平越高，忽視和虐待情況越輕(t=-6.23p＜0.01)。中日兩國大學生心理行為總分的比較，除過敏傾向外，其余得分異常者發(fā)生的比例中國學生顯著高于日本學生（p＜0.05）。中日兩國大學生青少年健康危險行為的發(fā)生狀況可以看出，日本學生在日常的健康危險行為中吸煙、飲酒、有自殺意念的發(fā)生率高于中國學生，中國學生在打架、玩電子游戲、離家出走的發(fā)生率高于日本學生。 2.飲酒，逃學，離家出走，自殺意念，自殺行為，暴力行為，孤獨傾向，身體癥狀，恐怖傾向，沖動傾向，家庭人口，父親健康狀況，母親健康狀況等因素同中國大學生兒童期虐待與忽視狀況差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。 3.中日兩國大學生CTQ-SF各量表分與MHT、SES得分的相關(guān)分析可以看出，MHT8個內(nèi)容量表得分與CTQ-SF分量表得分均為正相關(guān)，且大部分具有統(tǒng)計學意義；而SES總分與CTQ-SF分量表得分均為顯著負相關(guān)。 4.兩國大學生CTQ-SF總分與自尊心水平、心理健康狀況及危險行為發(fā)生率進行對比研究。SES總分，MHT總分，健康危險行為總分中國學生得分高于日本學生，CTQ-SF總分日本大學生得分高于中國學生，，除健康危險行為，差異均有統(tǒng)計學意義（P0.05）。 結(jié)論： 1.中日兩國兒童虐待與忽視均與個體及家庭因素有關(guān)。 2.中日兩國大學生自尊水平，心理健康水平，危險行為的發(fā)生率均不同。 3.兒童期受虐待與忽視經(jīng)歷對兒童長大后的心理行為影響十分重要。其中最主要的影響因素為飲酒，逃學，離家出走，自殺意念，自殺行為，暴力行為，孤獨傾向，身體癥狀，恐怖傾向，沖動傾向，家庭人口，父母健康狀況。
[Abstract]:Objective: in this study, 200 Japanese college students and 3060 Chinese college students were selected as subjects, and their childhood abuse and neglect were screened by CTQ-SF. The relationship between childhood abuse and neglect and their psychological behavior is discussed and compared. Methods: on July 15, 2013, 200 college students were randomly selected from four subjects of health development, nursing, scientific therapy and occupational therapy in a Japanese university. 3060 freshmen were investigated by CTQ-SF childhood abuse questionnaire, adolescent health risk behavior scale and MHT mental health diagnostic test. Results: 1. There was a negative correlation between the total score of SES and neglect and abuse in Chinese and Japanese college students. The higher the self-esteem level, the lighter the degree of neglect and abuse was. Comparing the total scores of psychological behavior between Chinese and Japanese college students, except allergic tendency, the proportion of Chinese students with abnormal scores was significantly higher than that of Japanese students (P < 0.05). As can be seen from the occurrence of adolescent health risk behaviors among college students in China and Japan, the incidence of smoking, drinking alcohol and suicidal ideation among Japanese students is higher than that of Chinese students, who are fighting and playing video games. The incidence of running away from home is higher than that of Japanese students. 2. Drinking, skipping school, running away from home, suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, violence, loneliness, physical symptoms, terrorist tendencies, impulsive tendencies, family population, father's health, There was a significant difference in maternal health status between Chinese college students and Chinese college students in childhood abuse and neglect (P 0.05). 3. The correlation analysis of CTQ-SF scores and MHT SES scores between Chinese and Japanese college students shows that the scores of 8 content scales and CTQ-SF subscales are all positively correlated, and most of them have statistical significance, while the total scores of SES and the scores of CTQ-SF subscales are all significantly negatively correlated. 4. The total score of CTQ-SF was compared with the level of self-esteem, mental health status and the incidence of risk behavior between the two countries. The total score of Chinese students' health risk behavior was higher than that of Japanese students' total score of CTQ-SF. The score of Japanese college students was higher than that of Chinese students, except for health risk behavior, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). Conclusion: 1. Child abuse and neglect in China and Japan are related to individual and family factors. 2. The level of self-esteem, mental health and risk behavior of Chinese and Japanese college students were different. 3. Childhood abuse and neglect play an important role in children's psychological behavior. The main influencing factors were drinking, truancy, running away from home, suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, violence, loneliness, physical symptoms, terrorist tendency, impulsive tendency, family population, parents' health.
【學位授予單位】：山西醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B844.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 車廣吉;丁艷輝;徐明;;論構(gòu)建學校、家庭、社會教育一體化的德育體系——尤·布朗芬布倫納發(fā)展生態(tài)學理論的啟示[J];東北師大學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年04期

2 黃群明;趙幸福;林漢民;劉永忠;尹祚平;周云飛;李龍飛;;356名高中生的兒童期虐待問卷調(diào)查[J];中國健康心理學雜志;2006年01期

3 陶芳標,張洪波,王德斌,楊善發(fā),蘇普玉,鳳爾翠,許韶君,許娟,張麗英;社會文化因素對安徽省農(nóng)村兒童體罰行為的影響[J];中國全科醫(yī)學;2004年03期

4 賴海雄;;青少年自殺的家庭危險因素探析[J];精神醫(yī)學雜志;2009年01期

5 楊世昌;張亞林;杜愛玲;;兒童被忽視量表的編制、信度和效度(英文)[J];實用兒科臨床雜志;2009年16期

6 谷來有,遲淑艷,張兆華;某高校大學生兒童期性虐待情況[J];中國學校衛(wèi)生;2005年04期

7 陳晶琦;391名大學生兒童期軀體情感虐待經(jīng)歷及其對心理健康的影響[J];中國校醫(yī);2005年04期

8 孟慶躍;劉興柱;王峰;;公眾對嚴重侵犯兒童權(quán)利行為的認識[J];中國社會醫(yī)學;1994年01期

9 王健;劉興柱;孟慶躍;許加龍;陳龍寶;;兒童虐待頻度及影響因素分析[J];中國社會醫(yī)學;1994年01期

10 孟慶躍;王健;黃思桂;劉興柱;;虐兒方式及其影響因素分析[J];中國社會醫(yī)學;1994年01期

本文編號：1949153