本文選題：文化價(jià)值取向 + 家庭主義��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：研究目的:1、修訂中文版文化價(jià)值取向量表,為客觀測評我國青年的文化價(jià)值取向提供量化工具。2、調(diào)查測評我國青年人文化價(jià)值取向(個人主義、集體主義、家庭主義)現(xiàn)狀。比較青年人文化價(jià)值取向和家庭觀念的代際和城鄉(xiāng)差異,探索文化變遷對文化價(jià)值取向的影響。3、探討我國青年文化價(jià)值取向與心理健康的相關(guān)性。研究方法:采用問卷調(diào)查法對不同人群進(jìn)行施測:樣本一:使用自編一般情況問卷、文化價(jià)值取向量表(CVO)和水平-垂直個人主義-集體主義量表(HVCI)調(diào)查來自山東、河南、安徽、浙江等多個省份,938名青年人,其中高中生498人,大學(xué)生440人。年齡范圍16-25歲(18±1.6歲)。男生458人,女生480人。獨(dú)生子女472人,非獨(dú)生子女466人。來自城市403人,來自農(nóng)村535人。樣本二:使用自編一般情況問卷、家庭觀念問卷、文化價(jià)值取向量表(CVO)、一般健康問卷-28(GHQ-28)、幸福感指數(shù)量表(1WB)、家庭功能評定量表(FAD)、自尊量表(SES)和領(lǐng)悟社會支持量表(PSSS)調(diào)查山東數(shù)所高校大學(xué)生,回收有效樣本436人,其中大一學(xué)生111人,大二學(xué)生266人,大三學(xué)生59人。學(xué)生年齡范圍19-25歲(20± 1.29歲)。男生213人,女生223人。獨(dú)生子女190人,非獨(dú)生子女246人。來自城市學(xué)生177人,來自農(nóng)村的學(xué)生259人。同時隨機(jī)調(diào)查山東部分城市父代群體,年齡范圍35-56歲(45.3±3.8歲),為保證該群體答題質(zhì)量采用一對一的紙質(zhì)問卷答題方式且僅填寫一般情況問卷、文化價(jià)值取向量表和家庭觀念問卷�；厥沼行颖�192人,其中男性93人,女性99人。學(xué)歷水平:初中及以下60人,高中63人,大學(xué)61人,碩士 3人,博士 5人。使用SPSS 19.0和AMOS20.0統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件,采用獨(dú)立樣本t檢驗(yàn)、Pearson相關(guān)分析、線性回歸和結(jié)構(gòu)方程模型等統(tǒng)計(jì)方法整理分析數(shù)據(jù)。研究結(jié)果:1、文化價(jià)值取向量表在我國青年群體中具有較好的信效度:探索性因素分析中各條目在其所屬維度因素負(fù)荷量均大于0.4,驗(yàn)證性因素分析3個分量表的RMSEA分別為0.04、0.03、0.05,數(shù)據(jù)與模型適配度良好;信度分析中整體量表的Cronbach's α系數(shù)為0.89,家庭主義、個人主義和集體主義分量表Cronbach'sα 系數(shù)分別為 0.88、0.73、0.84。2、我國青年人文化價(jià)值取向的現(xiàn)狀:青年人文化價(jià)值取向水平依次是:家庭主義(4.16±0.51)、集體主義(3.70±0.47)、個人主義(3.41±0.43);青年人對家庭觀念中的家庭責(zé)任(3.50士0.82)和孝順父母(3.88±0.67)認(rèn)可度較高,對操心子女認(rèn)可度較低(2.32±0.69);女生家庭主義取向顯著高于男生,家庭責(zé)任認(rèn)可度低于男生;獨(dú)生子女集體主義取向和對孝順父母的認(rèn)可度顯著低于非獨(dú)生子女。3、文化變遷對青年人文化價(jià)值取向和家庭觀念的影響,以代際和城鄉(xiāng)差異為文化變遷的指標(biāo),結(jié)果顯示:年輕一代的集體主義價(jià)值取向和對家庭觀念(家庭責(zé)任、孝順父母、操心子女)的認(rèn)可度都顯著低于父代(P0.01)。城市青年個人主義價(jià)值取向顯著高于農(nóng)村青年,對家庭觀念中的操心子女的認(rèn)可度顯著高于農(nóng)村青年人,對孝順父母認(rèn)可度顯著低于農(nóng)村青年人(P0.05)。4、家庭主義與一般健康、幸福感指數(shù)、自尊顯著正相關(guān);個人主義和集體主義與幸福感指數(shù)和自尊顯著正相關(guān);回歸分析顯示家庭主義對一般健康、幸福感指數(shù)和自尊均具有顯著預(yù)測作用,個人主義和集體主義對幸福感指數(shù)和自尊具有顯著積極預(yù)測作用。并且結(jié)構(gòu)方程模型也驗(yàn)證了家庭主義通過家庭功能和社會支持的中介作用預(yù)測一般心理健康。研究結(jié)論:1、文化價(jià)值取向量表在我國青年群體中具有較好的信效度,可用于個人主義、集體主義和家庭主義的測量和研究。2、以代際和城鄉(xiāng)為指標(biāo)的社會文化變遷對我國青年人文化價(jià)值取向和家庭觀念產(chǎn)生了顯著影響,青年一代集體主義取向比父代顯著減弱,且對家庭觀念(家庭責(zé)任、操心子女、孝順父母)的認(rèn)可度比父代顯著減弱;城市青年人的個人主義取向比農(nóng)村青年人顯著增高。3、家庭主義與一般健康、幸福感指數(shù)和自尊顯著相關(guān);個人主義集體主義與幸福感指數(shù)和自尊顯著相關(guān);家庭主義能夠積極預(yù)測所有心理健康指標(biāo),且通過家庭功能和社會支持的中介作用預(yù)測心理健康。
[Abstract]:The purpose of the study is: 1, revising the Chinese version of the cultural value orientation scale to provide a quantitative tool for assessing the cultural value orientation of the young people in China,.2, to investigate and evaluate the cultural value orientation of the young people in China (individualism, collectivism, family doctrine) and to compare the differences between the generations and the urban and rural areas of the cultural values and family ideas of the young people, and explore the differences between the generations and the urban and rural areas. The influence of change on cultural value orientation.3, the correlation between cultural value orientation and mental health of young people in China. Research methods: questionnaire survey method for different population: sample 1: using self-made general situation questionnaire, cultural value orientation scale (CVO) and horizontal vertical individualism collectivism scale (HVCI) survey From Shandong, Henan, Anhui, Zhejiang and other provinces, 938 young people, including 498 senior middle school students and 440 college students. Age 16-25 (18 + 1.6 years). Boys 458, girls 480. Only children 472, 466 people. From city 403, from rural 535. Sample two: use self-made general situation questionnaire, family concept ask The volume (CVO), the general health questionnaire -28 (GHQ-28), the happiness index scale (1WB), the family function assessment scale (FAD), the self-esteem scale (SES) and the understanding social support scale (PSSS) were used to investigate the college students in Shandong, including 111 of the first students, 266 sophomore students and 59 junior students. The age range of 19-25 years (20 + 1.29 years). 213 boys and 223 girls, 190 only children and 246 children. 177 from city students and 259 students from rural areas. At the same time, the parents of some cities in Shandong were randomly investigated. The age range was 35-56 years old (45.3 + 3.8), and a one-to one paper questionnaire was used to guarantee the quality of the answer. And only fill in the general situation questionnaire, cultural value orientation scale and family concept questionnaire. 192 effective samples were recovered, including 93 male and 99 female. Education level: junior middle school and below 60, high school 63, University 61, 3 master, and 5 doctor. Use SPSS 19 and AMOS20.0 statistics software, use independent sample t test, Pearson Statistical methods such as correlation analysis, linear regression and structural equation model were used to analyze the data. The results were as follows: 1, the cultural value oriented scale has a good reliability and validity in the youth group of our country: the load of each item in its subordinate dimension is greater than 0.4 in the exploratory factor analysis, and the RMSEA of the confirmatory factor analysis 3 subscales is 0, respectively. .04,0.03,0.05, the fitness of the data and the model is good; the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the overall scale in the reliability analysis is 0.89, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of family doctrine, individualism and collectivism is 0.88,0.73,0.84.2 respectively. The status quo of the cultural value orientation of the young people in our country: the level of the cultural value orientation of the young people is as follows: family doctrine (4.1 6 + 0.51), collectivism (3.70 + 0.47) and individualism (3.41 + 0.43); young people have higher recognition degree of family responsibility (3.50 and 0.82) and filial piety parents (3.88 + 0.67), and lower approval degree to worry children (2.32 + 0.69); girls' family doctrine is significantly higher than boys, and family responsibility recognition is lower than boys; the only child collective owner The degree of righteousness orientation and acceptance of filial piety parents is significantly lower than that of the non only child.3, the influence of cultural change on the cultural value orientation and family concept of the young people, and the cultural changes of the intergenerational and urban and rural differences, the result shows that the collectivism value orientation of the young generation and the concept of Family Court (family responsibility, filial piety parents, and worry about children) The degree of accreditation was significantly lower than that of the father generation (P0.01). The individualism value orientation of urban youth was significantly higher than that of the rural youth. The approval degree of the children in the family concept was significantly higher than that of the rural young people. The degree of approval of the filial piety parents was significantly lower than that of the rural young people (P0.05).4, and the family doctrine was positively correlated with the general health, the happiness index and the self-esteem. Individualism and collectivism are positively correlated with happiness index and self-esteem; regression analysis shows that family principles have a significant predictive effect on general health, happiness index and self-esteem, and individualism and collectivism have a significant positive prediction for happiness index and self-esteem. And the structural equation model also validates family owners. It predicts general mental health through the intermediary role of family function and social support. Research conclusions: 1, the cultural value orientation scale has good reliability and validity in our youth group, and can be used in the measurement and study of individualism, collectivism and family doctrine,.2, and the social and cultural changes of the intergenerational and urban and rural areas to our youth. People's cultural value orientation and family concept had a significant influence. The collectivism of the young generation was significantly weaker than the father, and the recognition of family concept (family responsibility, children, filial piety) was significantly lower than that of the father; the individualistic orientation of the urban young people was significantly higher than that of the rural young people.3, family and general health, There is a significant correlation between happiness index and self-esteem; individualism collectivism is significantly related to happiness index and self-esteem; family principles can positively predict all mental health indicators and predict mental health through the intermediary role of family function and social support.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B844.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 廖友國;何偉;吳真真;;EPQ人格維度與中國人心理健康關(guān)系及其影響因素的元分析[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2017年02期

2 鄒榮華;;從《喜福會》母女沖突看中美家庭觀[J];現(xiàn)代交際;2016年20期

3 高力克;;新文化運(yùn)動中的個人主義[J];史學(xué)月刊;2015年11期

4 江程銘;李紓;;中介分析和自舉(Bootstrap)程序應(yīng)用[J];心理學(xué)探新;2015年05期

5 崔曉卉;;從中美家庭文化看中美親子關(guān)系的差異[J];考試周刊;2015年72期

6 張晨艷;周宗奎;耿協(xié)鑫;牛更楓;;應(yīng)激性事件對大學(xué)生心理健康的影響:希望的中介作用[J];高等教育研究;2015年07期

7 冉利軍;;從家庭主義培育社區(qū)公共性的可能性探討[J];商;2014年25期

8 彭大松;;家庭價(jià)值觀結(jié)構(gòu)、代際變遷及其影響因素[J];當(dāng)代青年研究;2014年04期

9 黃任之;John R.Z.Abela;Fallyn Leibovitch;;個人主義-集體主義量表中文版的主要維度和效度[J];四川精神衛(wèi)生;2014年01期

10 胥劉秀;沈珊珊;何靜靜;付曄;薛曉冬;梁艷;林燕;張?bào)泸?何金彩;;乳腺癌患者的焦慮、抑郁、幸福感指數(shù)及社會支持[J];中國心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2013年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李歆樂;人格特征與價(jià)值取向在中國大學(xué)生心理疾病污名中的作用[D];華南理工大學(xué);2016年

2 付玉霞;有關(guān)集體主義/個人主義維度不同傾向的實(shí)證研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2013年

3 黃琨;中小學(xué)教師文化取向的特點(diǎn)及與其主觀幸福感的相關(guān)研究[D];西南大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1798766