本文選題：社會(huì)階層 + 系統(tǒng)合理信念　； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：不誠(chéng)實(shí)行為指的是表里不一、虛假的行為,常見(jiàn)的形式有作弊和欺詐等。近年來(lái),媒體雖然不時(shí)曝光出極端的詐騙案件,但對(duì)人們?nèi)粘Ｉ钪兴霾徽\(chéng)實(shí)行為的關(guān)注則較少。然而,正是這些日常生活中的不誠(chéng)實(shí)行為給社會(huì)造成了大量的損失。盡管不誠(chéng)實(shí)行為在社會(huì)中是廣泛分布的,但已有一些研究發(fā)現(xiàn),處于較高社會(huì)階層的個(gè)體傾向于做出更多不誠(chéng)實(shí)行為。另一方面,根據(jù)相對(duì)剝奪理論,較低階層者也可能傾向于做出更多不誠(chéng)實(shí)行為。那么,社會(huì)階層與不誠(chéng)實(shí)行為之間的關(guān)系到底為何?其關(guān)系背后又存在著何種心理機(jī)制在起作用?另外,是否存在其他因素能夠調(diào)節(jié)社會(huì)階層與不誠(chéng)實(shí)行為的關(guān)系?這些問(wèn)題即是本研究所要考察的。通過(guò)對(duì)過(guò)往相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)的總結(jié),本研究建構(gòu)了一個(gè)有中介的調(diào)節(jié)模型,并設(shè)計(jì)了兩個(gè)研究來(lái)檢驗(yàn)這一理論模型。研究一為相關(guān)研究,在社會(huì)人士中考察社會(huì)階層與系統(tǒng)合理信念對(duì)應(yīng)得感和不誠(chéng)實(shí)行為的預(yù)測(cè)作用及過(guò)程。通過(guò)網(wǎng)絡(luò)發(fā)放問(wèn)卷,共得到有效樣本669名。問(wèn)卷所用量表包括客觀社會(huì)階層量表、系統(tǒng)合理化量表、心理權(quán)利量表以及HEXACO大六人格量表中的誠(chéng)實(shí)/謙虛子量表。數(shù)據(jù)分析的結(jié)果支持了有中介的調(diào)節(jié)模型。具體來(lái)說(shuō),系統(tǒng)合理信念能夠調(diào)節(jié)社會(huì)階層與應(yīng)得感,社會(huì)階層與不誠(chéng)實(shí)行為之間的關(guān)系。并且,當(dāng)系統(tǒng)合理信念較高時(shí),個(gè)體的社會(huì)階層越高,則其應(yīng)得感越高,進(jìn)而其不誠(chéng)實(shí)行為水平也越高;當(dāng)系統(tǒng)合理信念較低時(shí),這種效應(yīng)不顯著。研究二為實(shí)驗(yàn)研究,旨在檢驗(yàn)?zāi)Ｐ椭凶兞恐g的因果關(guān)系。首先對(duì)62名被試進(jìn)行預(yù)實(shí)驗(yàn),證實(shí)自編的系統(tǒng)合理信念操縱材料的有效性。接著以128名高校學(xué)生為被試,開始正式實(shí)驗(yàn),采用2 (被試階層:高、低)X2 (系統(tǒng)合理信念:高、低)組間設(shè)計(jì),分別操縱被試的主觀社會(huì)階層與系統(tǒng)合理信念,接著測(cè)量其應(yīng)得感與不誠(chéng)實(shí)行為。其中,不誠(chéng)實(shí)行為測(cè)量采用的是擲骰子任務(wù)。結(jié)果未能完全支持有中介的調(diào)節(jié)模型,而僅證實(shí)了系統(tǒng)合理信念能夠顯著調(diào)節(jié)社會(huì)階層與應(yīng)得感的關(guān)系。這可能是不誠(chéng)實(shí)行為的測(cè)量敏感性不夠所導(dǎo)致的。綜合來(lái)看,本研究所得的結(jié)論仍舊具有一定的理論與現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。
[Abstract]:Dishonesty refers to inconsistency, false behavior, common forms of cheating and fraud. In recent years, although the media have been exposed to extreme fraud in recent years, there is less attention to dishonesty in people's daily life. However, it is the dishonesty in these daily lives that has caused a lot of damage to the society. Loss. Although dishonesty is widely distributed in society, some studies have found that individuals in higher social strata tend to make more dishonesty. On the other hand, the lower class may also tend to make more dishonesty according to the theory of relative deprivation. Then, between social class and dishonesty What is the relationship behind the relationship? What is the psychological mechanism behind its relationship? In addition, is there any other factors that can regulate the relationship between social stratum and dishonest behavior? These are the problems to be examined. Two studies have been carried out to test the theoretical model. First, the study examines the role and process of the social strata and the system's rational belief in the prediction and process of dishonest behavior. A total of 669 effective samples are obtained through the network distribution questionnaire. The questionnaire includes the objective social stratum scale and the system rationalization. The scale, the mental rights scale and the honest / modest subscale in the HEXACO large six person scale. The results of the data analysis support a mediating adjustment model. In particular, the system's reasonable beliefs can regulate the relationship between social stratum and the sense of response, social stratum and dishonest behavior. And, when the system's reasonable belief is higher, the individual is more reasonable. The higher the social class, the higher the sense of acceptance, and the higher the level of dishonest behavior. When the reasonable belief of the system is low, the effect is not significant. The second is the experimental study, which aims to test the causal relationship between the variables in the model. First, the 62 subjects are tested to verify that the self compiled system of rational belief manipulation materials has been verified. Then, 128 college students were tested to start a formal experiment, using 2 (the subjects: high, low) X2 (system reasonable belief: high, low) group design to manipulate the subjective social stratum and the rational belief of the subjects, and then measure their sense of acceptance and dishonesty. The results failed to fully support the mediating regulation model, but only confirmed that the rational belief of the system could significantly regulate the relationship between social stratum and the sense of response. This may be the result of the lack of sensitivity of dishonest behavior.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B844.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 金劍;李曄;陳冬明;郭凱嬌;;權(quán)力和地位對(duì)自利行為的影響及其機(jī)制[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2017年05期

2 楊沈龍;郭永玉;胡小勇;舒首立;李靜;;低階層者的系統(tǒng)合理化水平更高嗎?——基于社會(huì)認(rèn)知視角的考察[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2016年11期

3 熊猛;葉一舵;;相對(duì)剝奪感:概念、測(cè)量、影響因素及作用[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2016年03期

4 郭永玉;楊沈龍;李靜;胡小勇;;社會(huì)階層心理學(xué)視角下的公平研究[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2015年08期

5 余俊宣;寇_g;;自私行為的傳遞效應(yīng)[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2015年06期

6 胡小勇;李靜;蘆學(xué)璋;郭永玉;;社會(huì)階層的心理學(xué)研究:社會(huì)認(rèn)知視角[J];心理科學(xué);2014年06期

7 鄭振清;巫永平;;貧富差距擴(kuò)大的政治效應(yīng)——全球金融危機(jī)以來(lái)東亞選舉政治變遷研究[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2014年11期

8 葉寶娟;溫忠麟;;有中介的調(diào)節(jié)模型檢驗(yàn)方法:甄別和整合[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2013年09期

9 劉欣;;中國(guó)城市的階層結(jié)構(gòu)與中產(chǎn)階層的定位[J];社會(huì)學(xué)研究;2007年06期

10 周浩,龍立榮;共同方法偏差的統(tǒng)計(jì)檢驗(yàn)與控制方法[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2004年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 楊沈龍;不同社會(huì)階層系統(tǒng)公正感的差異及其機(jī)制[D];華中師范大學(xué);2014年

2 陳婧;親社會(huì)行為在不同心理資源狀態(tài)下對(duì)不誠(chéng)實(shí)行為的抑制[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1773087