本文選題：社會排斥 + 辯證思維��； 參考：《遼寧師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：社會排斥是由于遭受拒絕或忽視，個體的歸屬需要與存在需要因為社會中的個體或集體影響而得不到滿足的現(xiàn)象和過程。社會排斥是常見的社會現(xiàn)象，例如引起負面情緒，帶來負面影響，減少自尊，嚴重影響人類健康。同時對行為產(chǎn)生影響也很深遠，被排斥的個體傾向于攻擊別人，他的攻擊不僅指向拒絕他的人，甚至指向無關(guān)的事物，，對社會公共安全造成很大的威脅。所以，對緩解社會排斥引起的消極影響的研究變得甚是重要。在實證研究的社會排斥中，現(xiàn)有的國外研究范式和研究結(jié)果適用于中國的背景需驗證。辯證思維是指執(zhí)中謙讓，避免偏激，雖然辯證思維能讓被試者對所面對的互動對象可能出現(xiàn)的行為進行多方面的思考，進一步使被試者的預(yù)期互動現(xiàn)象可能出現(xiàn)多種多樣的行為，但在決定自己采取何種互動行為時，被試者很有可能還是以互動對象可能出現(xiàn)的某一類行為所引發(fā)的人際交流威脅感為主。因此，辯證思維僅是讓個體對互動對象可能出現(xiàn)的行為做多方面的思考。辯證思維讓不利于個體自身發(fā)展的防御性反應(yīng)不再出現(xiàn)，是由于采取公正和客觀態(tài)度來處理威脅信息�；诖耍狙芯渴球炞C在中國和國外的出現(xiàn)同樣的負面影響，同時探索辯證思維行動是否可以減少社會排斥的消極后果。對社會排斥的研究選擇外國常見的網(wǎng)絡(luò)操作范式，選定內(nèi)隱攻擊作為因變量的指標。實驗一目的在于驗證基于情景故事的啟動辯證思維的操作是否可行，對于測量社會排斥誘發(fā)的影響，選擇內(nèi)隱聯(lián)想測驗進行測試。實驗二目的在于探索基于成語理解的啟動辯證思維法操作辯證思維是否有效，同樣選擇內(nèi)隱聯(lián)想測驗，使用內(nèi)隱攻擊作為攻擊性指標。實驗得到以下結(jié)論：(1)在中國文化背景下，社會排斥都沒有出現(xiàn)攻擊性行為，但是表現(xiàn)出攻擊性傾向。(2)辯證思維的干預(yù)對排斥后內(nèi)隱攻擊的影響是有效的。
[Abstract]:Social exclusion is due to being rejected or ignored, individuals need to belong and are in need of individual or collective effects because society and can not meet the phenomenon and process of social exclusion. It is a common social phenomenon, such as causing negative emotions, negative effect, reduce the self respect, seriously affect the human health. At the same time of behavior the effect is also very far-reaching, excluded individuals tend to attack others, his attack not only to reject him, even pointing to irrelevant things, a great threat to public safety. Therefore, the negative effects caused by social exclusion become ease is very important. In the empirical study of social exclusion, existing the foreign research paradigm and research results are applicable to Chinese background need to verify the dialectical thinking is that they avoid extreme humility, although the dialectical thinking allows subjects to face each other Thinking on moving object are likely to behave, is expected to further interactive phenomenon subjects may appear various behavior, but in deciding what their interaction, is a kind of behavior is likely to appear or interactive objects caused by interpersonal sense of threat. Therefore, the dialectical thinking is only thinking to do in many ways that individuals may appear on the interactive object. Make dialectical thinking is not conducive to the defensive reaction of the individual development no longer appear, is due to take a fair and objective attitude to deal with the threat of information. Based on this, this study is to verify the China and abroad appear in the same negative effect, at the same time to explore whether the dialectical thinking action can reduce the negative consequences of social exclusion. Research on social exclusion network operation paradigm common foreign, selected implicit attack As the dependent variable index. The experimental aim is to start verification based on scenario of dialectical thinking operation is feasible, the influence of induced repulsion of society, choose the IAT test. Experiment two aims to explore idiom comprehension start dialectical thinking method of dialectical thinking is based on effective operation, choose the same implicit association test and use the implicit attack as an attack index. The experimental results were as follows: (1) in the Chinese cultural background, social exclusion are not aggressive behavior, but aggressive tendencies. (2) effects of dialectical thinking of intervention after exclusion of implicit aggression is effective.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B842

【引證文獻】

中國碩士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前2條

1 朱凱欣;不同社會接納情景下大學(xué)生拒絕敏感性與攻擊性的相關(guān)研究[D];大連醫(yī)科大學(xué);2017年

2 鄢文鈺;社會偏見與威脅情境對攻擊性行為的影響[D];華中師范大學(xué);2015年

本文編號：1738911