發(fā)布時間：2018-03-31 17:26

  本文選題：反饋　切入點：信心判斷　出處：《東北師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：目擊者對證詞的信心判斷(JOC)對司法公正具有重要意義。目擊者的JOC受到反饋的重要影響。根據(jù)選擇性線索整合模型對反饋機制的解釋,反饋存在3個階段。其中,第3階段的評估環(huán)節(jié),即反饋的干擾信息是否為目擊者整合進判斷中,主要考慮的就是信息的可信度。在當(dāng)前研究中,信息的可信度主要是從信息提供者的權(quán)威性和支持信息的從眾人數(shù)兩個角度去衡量的。但是,當(dāng)前研究較少分析目擊者如何綜合評估權(quán)威和從眾兩者的反饋可信度,而對否定反饋的作用機制也缺乏系統(tǒng)解釋。因此,本研究研究了權(quán)威和從眾這兩個因素在肯定反饋中的作用,還探究了否定反饋下,權(quán)威與從眾對JOC的作用,補充了選擇性線索整合模型(SCIF)中目擊者對否定反饋的評估階段。研究分為實驗一和實驗二。實驗一提供給被試肯定反饋,實驗二提供否定反饋。實驗要求被試觀看一段犯罪視頻,回答一系列視頻問題,并做出JOC判斷。隨后,被試接受不同類型的反饋信息:警察高從眾、警察低從眾、兒童高從眾與兒童低從眾反饋,并再次對剛才回答過的問題進行一次JOC判斷。本研究發(fā)現(xiàn),權(quán)威與從眾影響目擊者對反饋信息的評估,從而影響到判斷的準(zhǔn)確性。否定反饋,正如肯定反饋評估可信度的過程一樣,目擊者也從權(quán)威和從眾的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)對可信度進行評估,與肯定反饋不同的是,否定反饋只有當(dāng)權(quán)威和從眾都處于高水平時,目擊者的判斷才會受到影響。
[Abstract]:The witness's confidence in the testimony and the judgment of the witness's confidence in the testimony (job) are of great significance to the justice of justice. The JOC of the witness is greatly influenced by the feedback. According to the explanation of the feedback mechanism by the selective clue integration model, there are three stages of the feedback. In the third stage, whether the feedback interference information is integrated into the judgment of the witness, the main consideration is the credibility of the information. The credibility of information is mainly measured in terms of the authority of the information provider and the number of followers who support the information. There is no systematic explanation of the mechanism of negative feedback. Therefore, this study studies the role of authority and conformity in positive feedback, and also explores the role of authority and conformity on JOC under negative feedback. The study is divided into two parts: experiment 1 and experiment 2. Experiment 1 provides positive feedback to the subjects. Experiment 2 provided negative feedback. The subjects were asked to watch a crime video, answer a series of video questions, and make a JOC judgment. In this study, we found that authority and conformity influence eyewitness's evaluation of feedback information, thus affecting the accuracy of judgment, negative feedback, negative feedback, negative feedback, negative feedback, negative feedback, negative feedback, negative feedback, negative feedback, negative feedback, negative feedback, negative feedback, negative feedback, negative feedback, and negative feedback. Just like the process of evaluating credibility with positive feedback, witnesses also assess credibility from the standards of authority and conformity, and unlike positive feedback, negative feedback is only when authority and conformity are at a high level. The witness's judgment will only be affected.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B842

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 畢研玲;丁建略;李紓;;目擊者信心與正確率的關(guān)系及影響因素[J];人類工效學(xué);2008年03期

2 王紅椿;劉鳴;張積家;向祖強;;目擊證人暗示感受性的研究及進展[J];心理科學(xué);2008年03期

3 莫然;;心理學(xué)關(guān)于目擊證人證言可靠性實證研究[J];心理科學(xué);2007年03期

4 蘇彥捷,孫金鑫;反饋對目擊證人辨認(rèn)信心的影響[J];心理與行為研究;2003年01期

，

本文編號：1691715