本文關(guān)鍵詞：初中生人際沖突與應(yīng)對：宜人性的調(diào)節(jié)作用研究　出處：《內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 人際沖突 應(yīng)對 宜人性 初中生

【摘要】：心理測量相關(guān)研究范式表明,宜人性人格特質(zhì)能夠顯著調(diào)節(jié)人際沖突應(yīng)對策略。但是,人際沖突策略的選擇往往建立在對人際沖突情景知覺的基礎(chǔ)上,人際沖突情景往往會(huì)影響沖突應(yīng)對策的選擇,在此背景下,本研究以宜人性特質(zhì)對人際沖突、應(yīng)對策略的調(diào)節(jié)作用是否受沖突情景因素影響為具體問題,連續(xù)進(jìn)行了三個(gè)具體研究:研究一在修訂測量工具的基礎(chǔ)上,驗(yàn)證人格特質(zhì)對人際沖突與應(yīng)對策略的調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng)。具體而言,在低沖突強(qiáng)度情境中,宜人性人格與直接協(xié)調(diào)、退避和報(bào)復(fù)三種應(yīng)對方式皆沒有顯著相關(guān);而在高沖突強(qiáng)度情境中,與低宜人者相比,高宜人性者更傾向于使用直接協(xié)調(diào)應(yīng)對,更少使用退避與報(bào)復(fù)應(yīng)對。這初步表明宜人性人格對沖突應(yīng)對的調(diào)節(jié)作用與沖突強(qiáng)度有關(guān)。研究二操縱沖突強(qiáng)度這一變量,考察沖突強(qiáng)度是否影響宜人性對人際沖突應(yīng)對的調(diào)節(jié)。研究以初中生為被試,使用2(低沖突/高沖突)×2(低宜人性/高宜人性)的設(shè)計(jì)來探討宜人性人格如何調(diào)節(jié)人際沖突應(yīng)對方式。結(jié)果表明,第一,宜人性人格是人際沖突與直接協(xié)調(diào)應(yīng)對之間的顯著調(diào)節(jié)變量,隨著人際沖突強(qiáng)度的增強(qiáng),低宜人性者將更少使用直接協(xié)調(diào)的應(yīng)對方式。第二,宜人性人格是人際沖突與退避應(yīng)對之間的顯著調(diào)節(jié)變量,隨著人際沖突強(qiáng)度的增強(qiáng),低宜人性者將更多使用退避的應(yīng)對方式。第三,宜人性人格是人際沖突與報(bào)復(fù)應(yīng)對之間的顯著調(diào)節(jié)變量,隨著人際沖突強(qiáng)的增強(qiáng),低宜人性者將更多使用報(bào)復(fù)應(yīng)對的方式。研究三操縱沖突強(qiáng)度與沖突意向兩個(gè)變量,考察沖突強(qiáng)度、意愿是否影響宜人性對人際沖突應(yīng)對的調(diào)節(jié)。研究以初中生為被試,使用2(低沖突/高沖突)×2(低宜人性/高宜人性)×2(有意/無意)的設(shè)計(jì)進(jìn)一步分析宜人性人格的調(diào)節(jié)作用。結(jié)果表明:第一,在有意情境下,宜人性人格是人際沖突與直接協(xié)調(diào)應(yīng)對之間的顯著調(diào)節(jié)變量,隨著人際沖突強(qiáng)度的增強(qiáng),與高宜人性相比,低宜人性者較少使用直接協(xié)調(diào)的應(yīng)對方式。在無意情境下,宜人性人格不會(huì)對直接協(xié)調(diào)產(chǎn)生顯著的調(diào)節(jié)作用。第二,在有意的情境下,宜人性人格是人際沖突與退避應(yīng)對之間的顯著調(diào)節(jié)變量,隨著人際沖突強(qiáng)度的增強(qiáng),與高宜人性者相比,低宜人性者將更多使用退避的應(yīng)對方式。而在無意的情境下,宜人性人格將不會(huì)對退避產(chǎn)生顯著的調(diào)節(jié)作用。第三,在有意的情境下,宜人性人格是人際沖突與報(bào)復(fù)應(yīng)對之間的顯著調(diào)節(jié)變量,隨著人際沖突強(qiáng)度的增強(qiáng),與高宜人性者相比,低宜人性者將更多使用報(bào)復(fù)應(yīng)對的方式。在無意的情境下,宜人性人格將不會(huì)對報(bào)復(fù)產(chǎn)生顯著的調(diào)節(jié)作用。通過三個(gè)研究得出的總結(jié)論是:測量學(xué)的相關(guān)研究范式中發(fā)現(xiàn)的調(diào)節(jié)作用會(huì)因?yàn)榫唧w沖突情境因素而有變化,具體表現(xiàn)為:第一,當(dāng)人際沖突中沒有呈現(xiàn)意向刺激時(shí),與高宜人性者相比,在高強(qiáng)度沖突下,低宜人性者更傾向于采用退避與報(bào)復(fù)應(yīng)對方式,而較少采用直接協(xié)調(diào)應(yīng)對方式;第二,當(dāng)個(gè)體認(rèn)為對方是有意導(dǎo)致沖突時(shí),在高強(qiáng)度人際沖突情境下,與高宜人性者相比,低宜人性者更少使用直接協(xié)調(diào)應(yīng)對方式,而是較多地采用退避與報(bào)復(fù)應(yīng)對;第三,對于初中生而言,當(dāng)個(gè)體認(rèn)為對方是無意導(dǎo)致沖突時(shí),宜人性人格不是人際沖突與應(yīng)對方式的顯著調(diào)節(jié)變量�？偠灾�,宜人性人格對人際沖突應(yīng)對策略的調(diào)節(jié)是有條件的,即交往一方知覺到對方是有意導(dǎo)致的強(qiáng)度較高的沖突行為。這也意味著人格與社會(huì)知覺同時(shí)發(fā)生作用。
[Abstract]:Show that the psychometric paradigm, agreeableness personality traits can significantly regulate interpersonal conflict coping strategies. However, interpersonal conflict strategies are often based on interpersonal conflict scene perception, interpersonal conflict situations often affect the conflict should be the choice of countermeasures, under this background, the research on agreeableness trait on interpersonal conflict regulation of coping strategies is affected by conflict situations factors for specific problems, conducted a series of three specific research: Research Based on a revised measurement tools, verification regulation effect of personality traits on interpersonal conflict and coping strategies. Specifically, in the low intensity conflict situation, pleasant personality and direct coordination. Retreat and revenge three coping styles are not significantly correlated; while in high intensity conflict situations, compared with low and high agreeableness, are more likely to use direct coordination To use fewer backoff and retaliation response. This indicated that the agreeableness personality of the relevant regulatory role conflict and conflict intensity. On two manipulation of this variable conflict intensity on conflict intensity affect the regulation of pleasant interpersonal conflict coping. Research on junior high school students as subjects, the use of 2 (low / high conflict * 2 (conflict) low agreeableness / high agreeableness) design to explore the human personality should be how to adjust the interpersonal conflict coping styles. The results show that, first, agreeableness personality is the interpersonal conflict and coordination between the coping variables significantly regulate directly, with the enhancement of interpersonal conflict intensity, low agreeableness will use direct coordination coping styles less. Second, agreeableness personality is significant mediator between interpersonal conflict and avoidance coping, along with the enhancement of the strength of interpersonal conflict, coping style and low agreeableness will use more avoidance. Three, pleasant personality is significant mediator between interpersonal conflict and coping with the enhancement of revenge, strong interpersonal conflict, low agreeableness will use more of the way to deal with retaliation. Three control conflict and conflict intention two variables, study the intensity of the conflict, will not affect regulation is agreeableness of interpersonal conflict coping. In order to study. Junior high school students as subjects, the use of 2 (low / high conflict conflict) * 2 (low / high agreeableness agreeableness) * 2 (intentional / unintentional) Regulation of agreeableness personality analysis further design. The results show that: first, in the intentional context, agreeableness personality is the interpersonal conflict and direct coordination between the significant variable response, with the increase of interpersonal conflict intensity, compared with high agreeableness, low agreeableness were less likely to use direct coordination ways. In no circumstances, agreeableness personality will not have a significant direct coordination The regulation. Second, in the intentional context, agreeableness personality is significant mediator between interpersonal conflict and avoidance coping, along with the enhancement of interpersonal conflict intensity, compared with high agreeableness, coping style and low agreeableness will use more backoff. In the context of intention, agreeableness personality will not have a significant moderating effect on the backoff. Third, in the intentional context, agreeableness personality is significant mediator between interpersonal conflict and coping with the enhancement of revenge, interpersonal conflict intensity, compared with high agreeableness, low agreeableness will use more coping ways. In retaliation unintentional situations pleasant personality will not have a significant moderating effect on revenge. Through three research conclusion of the theory is found: the regulation paradigm of Surveying in conflict situations because of the specific factors and change Of specific performance: first, when the interpersonal conflict is not present intention stimulation, compared with high agreeableness, in high intensity conflict, low agreeableness are more likely to adopt avoidance and revenge coping style, and less use of the direct coordination of coping style; second, when the individual thinks the other is intended to lead to conflict in high strength, interpersonal conflict situation, compared with high agreeableness, low agreeableness less direct coordination coping style, but with more avoidance and revenge coping; third, for junior high school students, when the individual thinks the other is not conflict, significant moderating variables agreeableness personality than interpersonal conflict and coping way. In short, pleasant personality is conditional on the regulation of interpersonal conflict coping strategies, namely Association party consciousness to each other is for high strength to lead to conflict for. It also means people Grid and social perception play a role.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：B848

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 戴健林;王樂偉;;人際沖突來源的理論與實(shí)證研究[J];心理科學(xué);2009年05期

2 鐘俊燕;曾菁;;兒童人際沖突與自我調(diào)解沖突能力之我見[J];銅陵職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

3 王志成;;高校管理中的人際沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[J];四川師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1992年03期

4 張智,代鐘進(jìn);中學(xué)生人際沖突解決策略取向及影響因素研究[J];應(yīng)用心理學(xué);2002年01期

5 張翔,樊富珉;大學(xué)生人際沖突行為及其與心理健康的關(guān)系[J];心理與行為研究;2004年01期

6 陳世平;兒童人際沖突解決策略與欺負(fù)行為的關(guān)系[J];心理科學(xué);2001年02期

7 劉猛;誰能架起婆媳間的心橋[J];心理世界;2002年04期

8 陳世平;王曉莊;;《兒童人際沖突應(yīng)對策略量表》的編制[J];心理與行為研究;2006年01期

9 何世福;化解中學(xué)生人際沖突的幾種策略[J];湖南教育;2002年09期

10 王芹,陳世平;中學(xué)生人際沖突解決策略的相關(guān)研究[J];心理與行為研究;2005年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前9條

1 劉滿興;;服刑人員獄內(nèi)人際沖突問題團(tuán)體咨詢的案例報(bào)告[A];中國心理衛(wèi)生協(xié)會(huì)第六屆學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)暨第二屆全國心理咨詢師大會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

2 樊富珉;張翔;;大學(xué)生人際沖突原因及其應(yīng)對方式的研究[A];高校心理健康教育專業(yè)化研究——第八屆全國高校心理健康教育與心理咨詢學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)論文集[C];2004年

3 李麗蘭;唐超文;徐欣國;;不同自尊的大學(xué)生宿舍人際沖突感及處理方式的比較研究[A];二十年“心”之探索——高校心理健康教育理論與方法研究[C];2010年

4 孫俊才;;提高大學(xué)生對人際沖突導(dǎo)致的消極情緒的調(diào)節(jié)能力[A];第十屆全國心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2005年

5 唐素萍;王晶;;大學(xué)生人際沖突處理策略研究[A];第十屆全國心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2005年

6 陳勃;;大學(xué)生人際沖突問題的表征水平與策略取向[A];第十屆全國心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2005年

7 薛艷;傅宏;;寬恕輔導(dǎo)在應(yīng)對青春期人際沖突中的作用研究[A];心理學(xué)與創(chuàng)新能力提升——第十六屆全國心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2013年

8 陳江;歐陽連香;;大學(xué)生情緒智能與人際沖突處理方式的關(guān)系研究[A];第八屆（2013）中國管理學(xué)年會(huì)——組織行為與人力資源管理分會(huì)場論文集[C];2013年

9 邢寬;姚本先;;大學(xué)生宿舍人際沖突的責(zé)任推斷研究[A];中國社會(huì)心理學(xué)會(huì)2008年全國學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2008年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前6條

1 彭原;“約架”不如有話好好說[N];解放日報(bào);2014年

2 張志峰;應(yīng)對人際沖突是校長的必修課[N];中國教育報(bào);2010年

3 南京市雨花臺區(qū)實(shí)驗(yàn)小學(xué) 楊祖艷;培養(yǎng)健康心理 塑造完美人格[N];江蘇教育報(bào);2012年

4 木子;回避還是引導(dǎo)[N];中國社會(huì)報(bào);2002年

5 陳向陽;多多關(guān)注“惡性傷害后果”[N];解放日報(bào);2008年

6 崔仕谷;過分關(guān)注健康成“新病”[N];科技日報(bào);2003年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 沈秉R，

本文編號：1411697