《三國史記》高句麗始祖神話與建國神話的文獻史源
發(fā)布時間:2018-12-17 01:48
【摘要】:《三國史記》中反映的高句麗始祖神話和建國神話在《山海經(jīng)》、《史記》、《論衡》、《淮南子》等漢地文獻中都能找到其原型。可以說,高句麗始祖神話和建國神話是在其國家壯大過程中逐步形成的,亦是在汲取了大量漢地史籍中的華夏文化的基礎上演繹加工的結果。高句麗王室通過這樣的祖先神化過程,為其統(tǒng)治的合理性尋找依據(jù),鞏固和擴大其統(tǒng)治能力,強化君權神授的思想意識。這種借用華夏神話因素的做法,側面反映了其與中原漢地的交流和文化源流。
[Abstract]:The mythology of the ancestor of Koguryo and the mythology of founding a nation reflected in the Historical Records of the three Kingdoms can be found in the Han literature such as Shan Hai Jing, Shi Ji, Heng, Huainan Zi and so on. It can be said that the myth of the ancestor of Gaoguryo and the myth of founding the people's Republic of China were gradually formed in the course of the expansion of their country, and were also the result of deduction and processing on the basis of absorbing a large number of Chinese culture in the historical books of the Han Dynasty. Through this process of deification of ancestors, the Koguryo royal family sought the basis for the rationality of its rule, consolidated and expanded its ruling ability, and strengthened the ideological consciousness of the divine power of the monarchy. This method of borrowing Chinese mythology reflects its communication and cultural origin with the Central Plains.
【作者單位】: 東北師范大學歷史文化學院;
【基金】:教育部哲學社會科學研究重大委托項目“韓國文獻中高句麗史料整理與研究”(項目編號:16JZDW005) 吉林省社會科學基金項目“高句麗諸王問題研究”(項目編號:2016JD68)階段性成果
【分類號】:K312.31
[Abstract]:The mythology of the ancestor of Koguryo and the mythology of founding a nation reflected in the Historical Records of the three Kingdoms can be found in the Han literature such as Shan Hai Jing, Shi Ji, Heng, Huainan Zi and so on. It can be said that the myth of the ancestor of Gaoguryo and the myth of founding the people's Republic of China were gradually formed in the course of the expansion of their country, and were also the result of deduction and processing on the basis of absorbing a large number of Chinese culture in the historical books of the Han Dynasty. Through this process of deification of ancestors, the Koguryo royal family sought the basis for the rationality of its rule, consolidated and expanded its ruling ability, and strengthened the ideological consciousness of the divine power of the monarchy. This method of borrowing Chinese mythology reflects its communication and cultural origin with the Central Plains.
【作者單位】: 東北師范大學歷史文化學院;
【基金】:教育部哲學社會科學研究重大委托項目“韓國文獻中高句麗史料整理與研究”(項目編號:16JZDW005) 吉林省社會科學基金項目“高句麗諸王問題研究”(項目編號:2016JD68)階段性成果
【分類號】:K312.31
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 于波;;漢文化對高句麗文化的影響[J];東北史地;2006年02期
2 楊軍;;高句麗人口問題研究[J];東北史地;2006年05期
3 秦升陽;梁啟政;;高句麗軍事問題述略[J];東北史地;2007年02期
4 高福順;;逐本溯源 考實求真——《高句麗民族與國家的演變》評介[J];東北史地;2007年02期
5 俞慈韻;中外文化交流的新成果——漢城版《高句麗簡史》評介[J];東疆學刊;1993年02期
6 劉子敏;走出高句麗歷史研究的誤區(qū)──試析古人在高句麗歸屬問題上的錯誤說法[J];東疆學刊;2000年01期
7 王臻,金星月;高句麗“三貊”說[J];延邊大學學報(社會科學版);2000年02期
8 樸燦奎;高句麗侯,
本文編號:2383433
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2383433.html
最近更新
教材專著