【摘要】： 臺(tái)灣問題是影響中日關(guān)系發(fā)展的重要因素。準(zhǔn)確地把握日本在臺(tái)灣問題上的官方立場,是我們制定符合實(shí)際的對日政策的前提。本文圍繞臺(tái)灣問題,梳理戰(zhàn)后日本對華政策,得出如下結(jié)論:戰(zhàn)后日本在臺(tái)灣問題上的立場經(jīng)歷了由“一個(gè)中國”到“兩個(gè)中國”,再回歸“一個(gè)中國”的轉(zhuǎn)變。 戰(zhàn)后初期,日本簽署無條件投降書,明確表示接受《波茨坦公告》,正式將侵占半個(gè)世紀(jì)之久的臺(tái)灣歸還中國,此時(shí)的日本在臺(tái)灣問題上承認(rèn)臺(tái)灣是中國的領(lǐng)土,持“一個(gè)中國”的立場。自吉田茂內(nèi)閣時(shí)期到佐藤榮作內(nèi)閣時(shí)期,日本在臺(tái)灣問題上始終堅(jiān)持“兩個(gè)中國”的立場。根據(jù)不同時(shí)期的表現(xiàn)和特點(diǎn),大體上可以分為三個(gè)時(shí)期:吉田茂內(nèi)閣時(shí)期是日本的“兩個(gè)中國”立場的形成期;自鳩山一郎內(nèi)閣時(shí)期至佐藤榮作內(nèi)閣的前期是日本的“兩個(gè)中國”立場的穩(wěn)定期;佐藤榮作內(nèi)閣的后期是日本的“兩個(gè)中國”立場的松動(dòng)期。只是到田中角榮內(nèi)閣成立后,日本才接受中國提出的“復(fù)交三原則”,在臺(tái)灣問題上正式回到“一個(gè)中國”的立場。中日邦交正�；虼说靡宰罱K實(shí)現(xiàn)。 作為專題研究,本文以時(shí)間為序、以史料為據(jù),將戰(zhàn)后日本歷屆內(nèi)閣在臺(tái)灣問題上的立場的形成、發(fā)展和轉(zhuǎn)變的過程作為局部,將中日邦交正�；癁橹沟膽�(zhàn)后日本歷屆內(nèi)閣的對華政策作為整體,把局部和整體相結(jié)合,以對該專題進(jìn)行全面、系統(tǒng)和深入的研究。 本文通過對該課題的研究,力圖對戰(zhàn)后日本在臺(tái)灣問題上的立場做出自己的表述和解釋,以期有助于我們更加清晰和準(zhǔn)確地對21世紀(jì)的日本在臺(tái)灣問題上的立場進(jìn)行定位,有助于我們正確地把握日本對華政策的走向。
[Abstract]:The Taiwan issue is an important factor affecting the development of Sino-Japanese relations. An accurate grasp of Japan's official position on the Taiwan issue is a prerequisite for us to formulate a realistic policy towards Japan. Focusing on the Taiwan issue, this paper summarizes Japan's policy towards China after the war and draws the following conclusions: Japan's postwar position on the Taiwan issue has undergone a transformation from "one China" to "two Chinas", and then to "one China". At the beginning of the post-war period, Japan signed an unconditional surrender, explicitly accepting the Potsdam Proclamation and formally returning Taiwan to China after half a century of occupation. At that time, Japan recognized Taiwan as China's territory on the Taiwan issue. To hold the "one China" position. From the time of Yoshida's cabinet to Sato's cabinet, Japan has always adhered to the "two Chinas" position on the Taiwan issue. According to the performance and characteristics of different periods, it can be divided into three periods: the period of Yoshida's cabinet is the forming period of Japan's "two Chinas" position; From the time of Hatoyama's cabinet to the early stage of Sato's cabinet is the stable period of Japan's "two Chinas" position, and the latter stage of Sato's cabinet is the loosening period of Japan's "two Chinas" position. It was only after the establishment of Tanaka Kakuei's cabinet that Japan accepted the "three principles" put forward by China and formally returned to the "one China" position on the Taiwan issue. As a result, the normalization of diplomatic relations between China and Japan was finally achieved. As a monographic study, this paper takes time as the order and historical data as the basis, taking the formation, development and transformation of the positions of successive Japanese cabinets on the Taiwan issue as part of the process. The Chinese policy of the successive Japanese cabinet after the war until the normalization of Sino-Japanese diplomatic relations is taken as a whole, and the partial and integral policies are combined in order to conduct a comprehensive, systematic and in-depth study on this topic. Through the study of this subject, this paper tries to make its own statement and explanation of Japan's position on the Taiwan issue after the war, in order to help us to position Japan's position on the Taiwan issue in the 21st century more clearly and accurately. It is helpful for us to correctly grasp the direction of Japan's China policy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：K313.5;D618

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 薛原;;我做解說員的二十天[J];臺(tái)聲;2010年02期

2 王衛(wèi)星;;美國莫忘記南北戰(zhàn)爭歷史[J];w，

本文編號(hào)：2383916