麥德維杰夫民主社會(huì)主義政治思想研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-28 15:30
【摘要】：羅伊·麥德維杰夫成長于斯大林執(zhí)政時(shí)期的蘇聯(lián),1969年他的著作《讓歷史來審判：斯大林主義的起源及后果》在國外發(fā)表,從一個(gè)歷史學(xué)家的角度深入地批判了斯大林以及斯大林主義,從而為其民主社會(huì)主義政治思想的形成奠定了基礎(chǔ)。1972年他在阿姆斯特丹和巴黎出版了《論社會(huì)主義民主》一書,系統(tǒng)地論述了自己民主社會(huì)主義的政治思想。從其民主社會(huì)主義政治思想的主要內(nèi)容來看,無論是提倡恢復(fù)列寧主義、擴(kuò)大黨內(nèi)民主和允許多黨制、恢復(fù)蘇維埃的職能、社會(huì)主義司法民主化,還是社會(huì)主義條件下公民言論自由等內(nèi)容無一不是直指斯大林時(shí)期以來(主要是斯大林時(shí)期和勃列日涅夫時(shí)期)蘇聯(lián)社會(huì)的種種弊端。麥德維杰夫試圖通過民主社會(huì)主義政治思想將斯大林主義從蘇聯(lián)剝離出去,使蘇聯(lián)成為一個(gè)民主的社會(huì)主義國家。他明確宣稱民主并不是資本主義社會(huì)才有的專利,社會(huì)主義同樣可以有民主。西方一直批評社會(huì)主義國家不民主,這是一種典型的西方中心論,即西方企圖將資本主義民主的模式推廣到全世界。麥德維杰夫堅(jiān)信社會(huì)主義民主能夠達(dá)到并超越資本主義民主,成為一種理想的民主模式,因?yàn)樯鐣?huì)主義民主體現(xiàn)了人類的愿望和追求。 論文共分為五部分,第一部分?jǐn)⑹隽苏撐牡倪x題依據(jù)和國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀。第二部分主要介紹了麥德維杰夫的生平和主要著作。文章第三部分詳細(xì)論述了麥德維杰夫關(guān)于社會(huì)主義制度下一黨制和多黨制、最高蘇維埃的職能和作用、社會(huì)主義司法民主,以及公民言論自由等主張。第四部分是論文的重點(diǎn),從蘇聯(lián)持不同政見者運(yùn)動(dòng)、對戈?duì)柊蛦谭蚋母锏挠绊?以及創(chuàng)建俄羅斯勞動(dòng)人民社會(huì)黨,具體實(shí)踐其政治主張三個(gè)方面分析了麥德維杰夫民主社會(huì)主義政治思想的影響。最后是結(jié)論部分,明確提出形成于赫魯曉夫時(shí)期的麥德維杰夫民主社會(huì)主義政治思想的根本出發(fā)點(diǎn),就是對斯大林集權(quán)主義的徹底批判。蘇聯(lián)的失敗不是社會(huì)主義制度的失敗,政治民主并不是資本主義國家的專利,社會(huì)主義民主能夠達(dá)到并超越資本主義民主,成為一種理想的民主模式。
[Abstract]:Roy Medivjaf, who grew up in the Soviet Union during Stalin's reign, published his book, Let History try: the Origin and consequences of Stalinism, in 1969. He criticized Stalin and Stalinism in depth from the perspective of a historian, thus laying the foundation for the formation of his democratic socialist political ideology. In 1972, he published on Socialist Democracy in Amsterdam and Paris. The political thought of democratic socialism is discussed systematically. Judging from the main contents of his democratic socialist political ideology, whether it is to advocate the restoration of Leninism, to expand inner-party democracy and to allow a multi-party system, to restore the functions of the Soviet Union, and to democratize the socialist judiciary. Or the freedom of speech of citizens under the socialist conditions, all of which directly point to the shortcomings of Soviet society since Stalin's period (mainly Stalin period and Brezhnev period). Medevijaf tried to separate Stalinism from the Soviet Union through democratic socialist political thought and make the Soviet Union a democratic socialist country. He made it clear that democracy was not the preserve of capitalist society, and that socialism could also have democracy. The West has been criticizing socialist countries as undemocratic, which is a typical western-centered theory that the West is trying to extend the model of capitalist democracy to the whole world. Madoff firmly believed that socialist democracy could achieve and surpass capitalist democracy and become an ideal democratic model because socialist democracy embodies the aspirations and pursuits of mankind. The paper is divided into five parts. The first part describes the basis of the topic and the current research situation at home and abroad. The second part mainly introduces the life and main works of MedeviJeff. In the third part of the article, the author discusses in detail his views on the one-party system and multi-party system under the socialist system, the functions and functions of the Supreme Soviet, the socialist judicial democracy, and the freedom of speech of citizens. The fourth part is the focus of the paper, from the Soviet dissident movement, the influence on Gorbachev reform, as well as the creation of the Russian working people's Socialist Party, It analyzes the influence of Medevievich's democratic socialist political thought from three aspects of concrete practice of his political propositions. The last part is the conclusion, which clearly points out that the fundamental starting point of Madevich's democratic socialist political thought formed in Khrushchev's period is the thorough criticism of Stalin's totalitarianism. The failure of Soviet Union is not the failure of socialist system. Political democracy is not the patent of capitalist countries. Socialist democracy can achieve and surpass capitalist democracy and become an ideal democratic model.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K512.5
本文編號：2363296
[Abstract]:Roy Medivjaf, who grew up in the Soviet Union during Stalin's reign, published his book, Let History try: the Origin and consequences of Stalinism, in 1969. He criticized Stalin and Stalinism in depth from the perspective of a historian, thus laying the foundation for the formation of his democratic socialist political ideology. In 1972, he published on Socialist Democracy in Amsterdam and Paris. The political thought of democratic socialism is discussed systematically. Judging from the main contents of his democratic socialist political ideology, whether it is to advocate the restoration of Leninism, to expand inner-party democracy and to allow a multi-party system, to restore the functions of the Soviet Union, and to democratize the socialist judiciary. Or the freedom of speech of citizens under the socialist conditions, all of which directly point to the shortcomings of Soviet society since Stalin's period (mainly Stalin period and Brezhnev period). Medevijaf tried to separate Stalinism from the Soviet Union through democratic socialist political thought and make the Soviet Union a democratic socialist country. He made it clear that democracy was not the preserve of capitalist society, and that socialism could also have democracy. The West has been criticizing socialist countries as undemocratic, which is a typical western-centered theory that the West is trying to extend the model of capitalist democracy to the whole world. Madoff firmly believed that socialist democracy could achieve and surpass capitalist democracy and become an ideal democratic model because socialist democracy embodies the aspirations and pursuits of mankind. The paper is divided into five parts. The first part describes the basis of the topic and the current research situation at home and abroad. The second part mainly introduces the life and main works of MedeviJeff. In the third part of the article, the author discusses in detail his views on the one-party system and multi-party system under the socialist system, the functions and functions of the Supreme Soviet, the socialist judicial democracy, and the freedom of speech of citizens. The fourth part is the focus of the paper, from the Soviet dissident movement, the influence on Gorbachev reform, as well as the creation of the Russian working people's Socialist Party, It analyzes the influence of Medevievich's democratic socialist political thought from three aspects of concrete practice of his political propositions. The last part is the conclusion, which clearly points out that the fundamental starting point of Madevich's democratic socialist political thought formed in Khrushchev's period is the thorough criticism of Stalin's totalitarianism. The failure of Soviet Union is not the failure of socialist system. Political democracy is not the patent of capitalist countries. Socialist democracy can achieve and surpass capitalist democracy and become an ideal democratic model.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K512.5
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 言實(shí);;羅伊·麥德維杰夫談蘇共失敗的原因和蘇中改革[J];國際共運(yùn)史研究;1992年04期
2 楊成明;麥德維杰夫?qū)Ω隊(duì)柊蛦谭蚝吞K聯(lián)改革發(fā)表看法[J];當(dāng)代世界社會(huì)主義問題;1988年01期
3 馬占芳;羅伊·梅德韋杰夫與勞動(dòng)人民社會(huì)黨[J];東歐中亞研究;1994年06期
，本文編號：2363296
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2363296.html
最近更新
教材專著
