【摘要】： 軍隊在整個羅馬共和國發(fā)展過程中占據(jù)了極其重要的位置,而作為軍隊主體組成部分的將軍和士兵之間的關(guān)系,隨著羅馬共和國歷史的發(fā)展,也在發(fā)生著變化。從塞爾維烏斯·圖里烏斯改革開始,羅馬開始實行公民兵制度,經(jīng)過馬略改革,將軍與士兵的關(guān)系開始取代國家與士兵的關(guān)系,蘇拉進(jìn)軍羅馬,開創(chuàng)了軍事獨裁制,將軍與士兵的關(guān)系逐漸演變成了赤裸裸的利益關(guān)系。隨著士兵不再服務(wù)于國家而是服務(wù)于將軍個人,羅馬共和國便陷入內(nèi)部廝殺,并最終走向滅亡。 本文共分為四部分,分別論述了從塞爾維烏斯改革后,地域聯(lián)系取代血緣聯(lián)系,破壞了舊的氏族血緣關(guān)系,以財產(chǎn)資格作為劃分人民等級的依據(jù),同時以按照財產(chǎn)等級征兵的方式取代了之前按庫里亞胞祖劃分軍隊的傳統(tǒng),這樣,公民兵就取代了氏族武裝,成為了羅馬軍隊的主體。在維愛戰(zhàn)爭和與高盧人作戰(zhàn)之后,卡米盧斯對當(dāng)時的公民兵制進(jìn)行了改革,其改革適應(yīng)了時代的需要,進(jìn)一步完善了羅馬的公民兵制,為羅馬隨后征服意大利,繼而稱霸地中海奠定了堅實的實力基礎(chǔ)。而在這一長期而又艱苦的征服過程中,軍隊發(fā)揮著至關(guān)重要的作用。而作為軍隊主體的將軍與士兵,同為羅馬公民,都很好地發(fā)揚了羅馬民族的光榮傳統(tǒng),以維護(hù)國家利益為己任,為羅馬的征服大業(yè)奉獻(xiàn)著各自的力量。但是隨著戰(zhàn)爭范圍和規(guī)模的擴(kuò)大,羅馬的兵源供應(yīng)出現(xiàn)危機。公民兵制已經(jīng)無法滿足現(xiàn)實的需要。加之巨大的勝利和不可計數(shù)的戰(zhàn)利品的涌入嚴(yán)重地腐蝕了羅馬的軍隊,軍隊內(nèi)部腐敗現(xiàn)象嚴(yán)重,士氣低落,以致戰(zhàn)斗力低下。馬略改革取消了征兵的財產(chǎn)資格的限制,大批的無產(chǎn)者和意大利的公民紛紛加入軍隊,軍隊的成分發(fā)生了巨大的變化,士兵們作戰(zhàn)的目的也隨之改變,不再是為了國家利益而戰(zhàn),新的羅馬軍隊與國家的聯(lián)系逐漸弱化,他們更傾向于忠于自己的將軍,因為只有跟隨將軍作戰(zhàn)并贏得勝利,他們才有可能獲得財富和土地,這就為軍事獨裁制的建立埋下了伏筆。公元前88年,蘇拉帶領(lǐng)他的士兵進(jìn)攻羅馬,并最終在他的軍隊的幫助下成功占領(lǐng)羅馬,并建立了自己的統(tǒng)治。蘇拉的士兵多年跟隨蘇拉作戰(zhàn),他們與蘇拉之間的聯(lián)系已經(jīng)相當(dāng)緊密。蘇拉死后,為了爭取士兵的支持,新的有野心的將軍紛紛以利益手段收買士兵,將軍與士兵的關(guān)系中的利益色彩更加濃重了。隨后的野心家們?nèi)鐒P撒、龐培、屋大維等,也都踏上了這條武力奪取政權(quán)之路。但是此時的士兵面對形勢的變化也開始作出對他們自己有利的選擇。隨著這種態(tài)勢的演進(jìn),士兵的欲望越來越難以滿足,兵變、叛離等背叛行為屢屢發(fā)生,這一切對于士兵來說似乎是理所當(dāng)然的,羅馬的光榮傳統(tǒng)此時已經(jīng)蕩然無存,留下的只是對利益的追逐,將軍與士兵之間的關(guān)系已經(jīng)徹底變成赤裸裸的利益關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:The military occupies an extremely important position in the development of the whole Roman Republic, and the relationship between the general and the soldiers, as the main part of the army, is changing with the development of the history of the Roman Republic. From the beginning of the Servius Turius reform, Rome began to implement the civil soldier system. After the reform of Marillo, the relations between the general and the soldiers began to replace the relations between the state and the soldiers, and Sula marched into Rome and created a military dictatorship. The relationship between the general and the soldiers gradually evolved into a naked relationship of interest. With the soldiers no longer serving the country but the generals, the Roman Republic fell into internal strife and eventually perished. This paper is divided into four parts. After the reform of Servius, the paper discusses the replacement of regional ties for blood ties, the destruction of the old clan kinship, and the use of property qualification as the basis for the classification of the people. At the same time, conscription according to property class replaced the tradition of dividing the army according to the ancestors of Curia, so that civil soldiers replaced the clan forces and became the main body of the Roman army. After the War of Vicarice and the battle against the Gauls, Camelus reformed the civil military system of the time, adapted to the needs of the times, and further improved the system of civil soldiers in Rome, for the subsequent conquest of Italy by Rome. Then it established a solid foundation of strength for dominating the Mediterranean Sea. In this long and arduous process of conquest, the army played a vital role. As the main body of the army, the generals and soldiers, who were both Roman citizens, well carried forward the glorious tradition of the Roman nation, took the national interests as their duty, and devoted their respective strength to the great cause of Roman conquest. But with the expansion of the scope and scale of the war, the supply of troops to Rome came into crisis. The civil military system has been unable to meet the actual needs. Combined with great victories and an incalculable influx of trophies, the Roman army was seriously corrupted by corruption, demoralization, and infighting capacity. The Marlorio reforms removed restrictions on the property eligibility of conscription, and a large number of proletarians and Italian citizens joined the army. The composition of the army changed dramatically, and so did the purpose of the soldiers in fighting. No longer fighting for the good of the nation, the new Roman army became less connected to the country, and they tended to be more loyal to their generals, for they could gain wealth and land only if they fought with them and won victory. This laid the groundwork for the establishment of a military dictatorship. In 88 BC, Sullah led his soldiers into Rome and eventually succeeded in occupying Rome with the help of his army and established his own rule. Sullah's soldiers fought with Sullah for many years, and their ties with Sullah were already strong. After Sura's death, the new and ambitious generals bought the soldiers by means of profit in order to win the support of the soldiers, and the relationship between the generals and the soldiers became more profitable. Later ambitious men such as Caesar, Pompey, Octavian and others set foot on the road to power by force. But the soldiers also began to make their own choices in the face of changing circumstances. With the evolution of this situation, soldiers' desires became more and more difficult to satisfy, and betrayal, such as mutiny, rebellion, and so on, occurred repeatedly, all of which seemed natural to the soldiers, and the glorious tradition of Rome was now gone. All that remains is the pursuit of profit, and the relationship between the general and the soldiers has been turned into a naked one.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：K126

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王鶴;;輔軍與羅馬化關(guān)系探微[J];北方論叢;2011年04期

2 ;[J];;年期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 張志鵬;宗教對氣象變幻的關(guān)注[N];中國民族報;2011年

2 ;缺鐵性貧血的謬誤[N];家庭醫(yī)生報;2005年

3 非可;解開“黃毛部落”之謎[N];廠長經(jīng)理日報;2001年

4 整理 本報實習(xí)記者 武建英;甘肅發(fā)現(xiàn)古羅馬后裔村[N];北京科技報;2004年

5 楊松長;練就應(yīng)對心理戰(zhàn)的素質(zhì)[N];中國國防報;2003年

6 車華　耿海軍;超常規(guī)武器發(fā)展引人注目[N];解放軍報;2003年

7 逸行;不朽的是奶酪[N];人民政協(xié)報;2002年

8 江雪;中興：全面協(xié)調(diào)越過“大峽谷”[N];中國企業(yè)報;2004年

9 雅文;國產(chǎn)手機悄然跨越“卡夫丁峽谷”[N];科技日報;2004年

10 劉國鵬 中國社會科學(xué)院世界宗教研究所;意大利學(xué)者對驪條人來源的看法[N];中國社會科學(xué)報;2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張曉校;羅馬軍隊與帝位嬗遞[D];東北師范大學(xué);2002年

2 王鶴;羅馬軍隊與西部行省羅馬化關(guān)系研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

3 董曉佳;帝國秩序的重建[D];南開大學(xué);2010年

4 朱文濤;古羅馬與漢代造物藝術(shù)比較研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 杜毅;論羅馬共和時期將軍與士兵關(guān)系的演變[D];東北師范大學(xué);2010年

2 趙晶晶;羅馬共和國時期的愛國精神[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2010年

3 康凱;古羅馬軍隊與文化融合[D];上海師范大學(xué);2009年

4 王曉鵬;早期羅馬帝國駐不列顛輔軍研究[D];南開大學(xué);2010年

5 魏曉明;試論朱里安的統(tǒng)治政策與實踐[D];中央民族大學(xué);2010年

6 孔金鋒;社會轉(zhuǎn)型視野中的羅馬帝制研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2011年

7 郭露;戴克里先的經(jīng)濟(jì)改革[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2011年

8 徐蕙;初中羅馬史教學(xué)實踐探討[D];南京師范大學(xué);2011年

9 方向昆;論土地制度與羅馬共和國的興衰[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2012年

10 王忠孝;論羅馬共和國后期和帝國早期的貴族葬禮及其功能[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：2235495