“菲利普王”戰(zhàn)爭之起源的建構(gòu)主義分析
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-06 14:59
【摘要】：本文旨在突破將“菲利普王”戰(zhàn)爭機(jī)械納入美國國內(nèi)史的傳統(tǒng)觀點,繞過將其簡單定義為殖民戰(zhàn)爭的觀點,嘗試從族群沖突的角度,以建構(gòu)主義的視閾去考察這場沖突的起源。 本文主要采取三種研究方法：1.史學(xué)方法收集史料,對中英文資料均有一定使用,包括部分一手材料。2.借鑒亞歷山大·溫特的建構(gòu)主義理論,以探尋“菲利普王"戰(zhàn)爭的起源為主軸,以兩大族群的矛盾為線索,建立起文化、權(quán)力與主體間互動這三條邏輯分支,從而構(gòu)成文章的主體框架。3.在關(guān)鍵概念和若干具體問題上借鑒人類學(xué)理論,尤其是勃羅姆列伊的“族群”理論。 本文的主要觀點和創(chuàng)新之處在于兩方面：1.在基本概念的界定上,筆者將“菲利普王”戰(zhàn)爭的當(dāng)事雙方界定為新英格蘭地區(qū)土著與WASP兩大族群。2.在結(jié)論上,本文認(rèn)為“菲利普王”戰(zhàn)爭是這兩大族群在新英格蘭地區(qū)共同構(gòu)成的族際社會體系所建構(gòu)的結(jié)果。該體系的建構(gòu)作用是這場戰(zhàn)爭的根源,它包括文化性因素、物質(zhì)性因素和主體間互動這三個方面。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to break through the traditional view that "King Philip" war machinery is included in the history of the United States, to bypass the idea of defining it simply as a colonial war, and to try to examine the origin of the conflict from the angle of ethnic conflict and from the perspective of constructivism. This article mainly adopts three kinds of research methods: 1. Historical methods to collect historical data, both Chinese and English materials have a certain use, including some primary materials. 2. Drawing lessons from Alexander Winter's constructivism theory, taking exploring the origin of King Philip War as the main axis, taking the contradiction of two ethnic groups as the clue, the three logical branches of culture, power and the interaction between the subject and the power are established. Thus constitute the main frame of the article. Draw lessons from anthropology theory in key concepts and some specific problems, especially Blomleyi's "ethnic group" theory. The main point and innovation of this paper lies in two aspects: 1. In the definition of the basic concept, the author defines the two parties involved in the "King Philip" War as the two major groups in New England: Aboriginal and WASP. In conclusion, this paper argues that the "King Philip" war is the result of the inter-ethnic social system constructed by these two groups in New England. The constructive function of the system is the root of the war. It includes three aspects: cultural factor, material factor and interaction between subjects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：K712
本文編號：2226704
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to break through the traditional view that "King Philip" war machinery is included in the history of the United States, to bypass the idea of defining it simply as a colonial war, and to try to examine the origin of the conflict from the angle of ethnic conflict and from the perspective of constructivism. This article mainly adopts three kinds of research methods: 1. Historical methods to collect historical data, both Chinese and English materials have a certain use, including some primary materials. 2. Drawing lessons from Alexander Winter's constructivism theory, taking exploring the origin of King Philip War as the main axis, taking the contradiction of two ethnic groups as the clue, the three logical branches of culture, power and the interaction between the subject and the power are established. Thus constitute the main frame of the article. Draw lessons from anthropology theory in key concepts and some specific problems, especially Blomleyi's "ethnic group" theory. The main point and innovation of this paper lies in two aspects: 1. In the definition of the basic concept, the author defines the two parties involved in the "King Philip" War as the two major groups in New England: Aboriginal and WASP. In conclusion, this paper argues that the "King Philip" war is the result of the inter-ethnic social system constructed by these two groups in New England. The constructive function of the system is the root of the war. It includes three aspects: cultural factor, material factor and interaction between subjects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：K712
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 戴永紅;;中印關(guān)系中機(jī)制化建設(shè)的必要性與可能性[J];南亞研究季刊;2012年02期
，本文編號：2226704
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2226704.html
最近更新
教材專著
