朝鮮半島“中立化論”研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-23 08:53
【摘要】： 朝鮮半島地處東北亞核心部位,介于中、日、俄三大國之間。歷史上,朝鮮半島正是由于具有這種獨特的戰(zhàn)略地位而屢次陷入大國爭奪的漩渦之中。從19世紀末的朝鮮王朝到20世紀中期的朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭,每當朝鮮半島陷入大國爭奪的危機狀態(tài)時,朝鮮半島“中立化論”就被推上政治前臺,但每次都未能真正得以實施。 冷戰(zhàn)以后,東北亞的國際形勢有所緩和。為了避免朝鮮半島重蹈歷史覆轍,很多韓國學者以前人的朝鮮半島“中立化論”為基礎(chǔ),提出了以“中立化”的方式實現(xiàn)朝鮮半島統(tǒng)一的“中立化統(tǒng)一論”。 本文即以朝鮮半島“中立化論”為探討對象,從歷史學的視角出發(fā),綜合運用國際法學、地緣政治學和國際關(guān)系學等多個學科的知識,試圖對該理論作一次縱向?qū)用娴难芯�。筆者旨在通過對具體史實的梳理和分析,力求清晰客觀地展現(xiàn)朝鮮半島“中立化論”產(chǎn)生及其發(fā)展演變的歷史脈絡(luò),并對該理論實現(xiàn)的可能性提出了自己的思考。 本文由引言和正文兩個部分組成,其中正文主要包括以下五個部分: 第一部分:該部分基于國際法學的知識和定義,首先界定了“中立”、“中立化”及相關(guān)概念,并從地緣政治的視角對朝鮮半島特殊的戰(zhàn)略地位以及朝鮮半島與有關(guān)大國的歷史糾葛進行了簡要的論述和分析。 第二部分:朝鮮王朝末期的朝鮮“中立化論”。該部分以大國在朝鮮半島力量的消長為分期依據(jù),介紹中日角逐朝鮮時期的朝鮮“中立化論”、日俄爭奪朝鮮時期的朝鮮“中立化論”以及朝鮮王室為爭取國家“中立化”的努力,并探討了這兩個時期各大國和朝鮮王朝提出“中立化論”的目的、內(nèi)容及“中立化”未能實現(xiàn)的原因。 第三部分:冷戰(zhàn)時期的朝鮮半島“中立化論”。冷戰(zhàn)之初,朝鮮半島走向了國家分裂,朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭促使美國提出了朝鮮半島“中立化論”,旨住韓國的主導下實行“中立化統(tǒng)一”。該部分以美國官方推出朝鮮半島“中立化論”的過程為主要線索,剖忻了這一時期朝鮮半島“中立化論”再次未能實現(xiàn)的原因,并指出該理論開始逐漸退出美國官方的視野。 第四部分:冷戰(zhàn)之后的朝鮮半島“中立化論”。該部分結(jié)合冷戰(zhàn)之后的東北亞國際發(fā)展趨勢,以新時期朝鮮半島“中立化論”的內(nèi)容(主要由韓國學者提出)為依據(jù),對影響該理論實現(xiàn)的諸多因素進行了綜合分析,并在此基礎(chǔ)上對該理論實現(xiàn)的可能性做出了自己的判斷。 第五部分:結(jié)語。該部分對全文做了總結(jié),進一步闡明了作者對朝鮮半島“中立化論”實現(xiàn)前景所持有的觀點。 歷史上,有關(guān)大國首先提出朝鮮半島“中立化論”,爾后又都未能實行,這其中與中國有著緊密的聯(lián)系。而未來朝鮮半島何去何從,能否以“中立化統(tǒng)一”的方式成為“永久中立國”,更直接關(guān)系到中國的國家利益。筆者相信,新時期的中國外交一定能更好地適應時代發(fā)展的潮流,“與鄰為伴,以鄰為善”,與朝韓兩國共筑和平共贏的睦鄰友好關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:The Korean Peninsula is located at the core of Northeast Asia, between the three great powers of China, Japan and Russia. Historically, the Korean Peninsula has fallen into the whirlpool of great power contention for its unique strategic position. The "Neutralization" theory on the Korean Peninsula has been pushed onto the political front, but it has not been implemented every time.
After the cold war, the international situation in Northeast Asia eased. In order to avoid the Korean Peninsula repeating the historical mistakes, many Korean scholars put forward the "neutralization unification theory" of realizing the reunification of the Korean peninsula by means of "neutralization".
This paper, taking the neutralization theory of the Korean Peninsula as an object of study, tries to make a longitudinal study of the theory from the perspective of history by using the knowledge of international law, geopolitics and international relations. The historical context of the emergence and evolution of the "neutralization theory" on the Korean Peninsula, and the possibility of its realization are also discussed.
This article is composed of two parts, the introduction and the main body. The body contains five parts.
Part one: Based on the knowledge and definition of international law, this part defines "neutrality", "neutralization" and related concepts, and briefly discusses and analyzes the special strategic position of the Korean Peninsula and the historical entanglement between the Korean Peninsula and the Major Powers concerned from the perspective of geopolitics.
The second part: the "neutralization theory" of Korea in the end of the Korean Dynasty. This part introduces the "neutralization theory" of Korea when China and Japan compete for Korea, the "neutralization theory" of Korea when Japan and Russia compete for Korea, and the efforts of the Korean royal family to strive for the "neutralization" of the country on the basis of the growth and decline of the great powers on the Korean Peninsula. The purpose, content and reasons why neutralization was not realized by the major powers and dynasties in these two periods were discussed.
The third part: the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula in the cold war period. At the beginning of the cold war, the Korean Peninsula was divided into two states. The Korean War prompted the United States to put forward the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula, aiming at the implementation of "neutralization reunification" under the leadership of South Korea. The reason why the neutralization theory of the Korean Peninsula failed to come true again in this period is analyzed, and it is pointed out that the theory began to gradually withdraw from the view of the U.S. government.
The fourth part: the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula after the Cold War, which combines with the international development trend of Northeast Asia after the Cold War and based on the content of the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula in the new period (mainly put forward by Korean scholars), makes a comprehensive analysis of the factors influencing the realization of the theory, and on this basis analyzes the theory. The possibility of realization has made its own judgement.
The fifth part is the conclusion. This part summarizes the full text and further clarifies the author's views on the prospects of realizing neutralization on the Korean Peninsula.
Historically, the Major Powers concerned first put forward the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula and then failed to put it into practice, which is closely related to China. Foreign diplomacy will surely be able to better adapt to the trend of the times and build a peaceful and win-win good-neighborly and friendly relationship with the DPRK and ROK.
【學位授予單位】：西南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：K312
本文編號：2198539
[Abstract]:The Korean Peninsula is located at the core of Northeast Asia, between the three great powers of China, Japan and Russia. Historically, the Korean Peninsula has fallen into the whirlpool of great power contention for its unique strategic position. The "Neutralization" theory on the Korean Peninsula has been pushed onto the political front, but it has not been implemented every time.
After the cold war, the international situation in Northeast Asia eased. In order to avoid the Korean Peninsula repeating the historical mistakes, many Korean scholars put forward the "neutralization unification theory" of realizing the reunification of the Korean peninsula by means of "neutralization".
This paper, taking the neutralization theory of the Korean Peninsula as an object of study, tries to make a longitudinal study of the theory from the perspective of history by using the knowledge of international law, geopolitics and international relations. The historical context of the emergence and evolution of the "neutralization theory" on the Korean Peninsula, and the possibility of its realization are also discussed.
This article is composed of two parts, the introduction and the main body. The body contains five parts.
Part one: Based on the knowledge and definition of international law, this part defines "neutrality", "neutralization" and related concepts, and briefly discusses and analyzes the special strategic position of the Korean Peninsula and the historical entanglement between the Korean Peninsula and the Major Powers concerned from the perspective of geopolitics.
The second part: the "neutralization theory" of Korea in the end of the Korean Dynasty. This part introduces the "neutralization theory" of Korea when China and Japan compete for Korea, the "neutralization theory" of Korea when Japan and Russia compete for Korea, and the efforts of the Korean royal family to strive for the "neutralization" of the country on the basis of the growth and decline of the great powers on the Korean Peninsula. The purpose, content and reasons why neutralization was not realized by the major powers and dynasties in these two periods were discussed.
The third part: the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula in the cold war period. At the beginning of the cold war, the Korean Peninsula was divided into two states. The Korean War prompted the United States to put forward the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula, aiming at the implementation of "neutralization reunification" under the leadership of South Korea. The reason why the neutralization theory of the Korean Peninsula failed to come true again in this period is analyzed, and it is pointed out that the theory began to gradually withdraw from the view of the U.S. government.
The fourth part: the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula after the Cold War, which combines with the international development trend of Northeast Asia after the Cold War and based on the content of the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula in the new period (mainly put forward by Korean scholars), makes a comprehensive analysis of the factors influencing the realization of the theory, and on this basis analyzes the theory. The possibility of realization has made its own judgement.
The fifth part is the conclusion. This part summarizes the full text and further clarifies the author's views on the prospects of realizing neutralization on the Korean Peninsula.
Historically, the Major Powers concerned first put forward the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula and then failed to put it into practice, which is closely related to China. Foreign diplomacy will surely be able to better adapt to the trend of the times and build a peaceful and win-win good-neighborly and friendly relationship with the DPRK and ROK.
【學位授予單位】：西南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：K312
【引證文獻】
相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條
1 毛吉康;近代朝鮮半島中立問題研究（1882-1905）[D];復旦大學;2010年
，本文編號：2198539
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2198539.html
最近更新
教材專著
