【摘要】： 蘇聯(lián)史學期刊是蘇聯(lián)史學的一個重要部分.在其整個發(fā)展過程中20世紀20-30年代的初步發(fā)展時期是其發(fā)展的重要階段,經(jīng)歷了巨大的轉折,并且對之后整個蘇聯(lián)時期史學研究的發(fā)展影響深遠。 蘇聯(lián)史學期刊在其發(fā)展過程中顯著的特點就是積極參與討論。20-30年代是蘇聯(lián)國內(nèi)階級斗爭尖銳時期,尤其表現(xiàn)在意識形態(tài)領域,蘇聯(lián)史學期刊的發(fā)展深受影響。20年代初對各種歷史問題的討論是相當自由的,到了20年代中期后討論發(fā)生了變化常�？壅蚊弊�,對于不同的意見全部排斥。到了20年代末爭論越來越意識形態(tài)化,這不利于史學研究的進步。很多史學期刊因此而�？�,或者不再發(fā)表對一些歷史問題研究的論文。這導致蘇聯(lián)史學的發(fā)展長期停滯不前,蘇聯(lián)史學研究水平開始落后于西方國家。
[Abstract]:Soviet historiography periodical is an important part of Soviet historiography. In its whole development process, the initial development period in the 20th century 20-30 's is an important stage of its development, which has undergone a great turning point, and has a profound impact on the development of historical research in the whole Soviet period. In the course of its development, the remarkable characteristic of Soviet historiography periodicals is that they took an active part in discussing that the period of class struggle in the Soviet Union was sharp in the 1920s and 1930s, especially in the field of ideology. The development of Soviet historiography journals was deeply influenced by the discussion of various historical issues in the early 1920s. After the mid-1920s, the discussion often changed as a political label and rejected all different opinions. By the end of the 1920s, the debate was becoming more and more ideological, which was not conducive to the progress of historical research. As a result, many historical journals have ceased to publish or published papers on historical issues. As a result, the development of Soviet historiography stagnated for a long time, and the level of Soviet historiography began to lag behind the western countries.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：K512.53

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 張建華;再尋“路標”——僑民時期的斯圖盧威及其自由主義思想[J];北方論叢;2005年02期

2 馬龍閃;蘇聯(lián)的書報檢查制度及其對黨和國家發(fā)展的影響[J];俄羅斯研究;2004年02期

3 黃立，

本文編號：2173409