【摘要】：東京審判,即第二次世界大戰(zhàn)后各國(guó)依據(jù)《遠(yuǎn)東國(guó)際軍事法庭憲章》審判日本戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)罪犯的法庭及其審判活動(dòng)。東京審判以法律手段懲治了戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)罪犯,有力打擊了日本軍國(guó)主義勢(shì)力及其追隨者,但一直以來,日本右翼勢(shì)力陰魂不散,軍國(guó)主義思潮沉渣泛起,屢屢企圖為侵略歷史翻案,并試圖否定東京審判。我國(guó)民眾對(duì)“東京審判”知之甚少,對(duì)東京審判中涉及的國(guó)際刑事法律問題更是知之甚少。本文主要分為五個(gè)部分,對(duì)東京審判中的法律問題進(jìn)行分析研究。第一部分概述了東京審判的過程；第二部分詳細(xì)闡述了東京審判中存在的法律問題,包括程序、實(shí)體、責(zé)任承擔(dān)及刑罰執(zhí)行等四方面；第三部分是針對(duì)第二部分提出的問題進(jìn)行原因分析與法理分析,同時(shí)提出自己的思考；第四部分論述東京審判對(duì)國(guó)際刑事法律發(fā)展的啟示與影響；第五部分是對(duì)東京審判政治影響的歸納。總之,本文試通過深入分析東京審判中存在的法律爭(zhēng)議、產(chǎn)生原因以及對(duì)國(guó)際刑事法律發(fā)展的影響等問題,從法律角度對(duì)東京審判進(jìn)行研究分析,在提出個(gè)人思考的同時(shí),對(duì)企圖否定歷史,否定東京審判正當(dāng)性、合法性的勢(shì)力及學(xué)說以法理的有力回應(yīng)。同時(shí)借以本文紀(jì)念戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)死難者,警醒人們銘記歷史,珍愛和平。
[Abstract]:Tokyo trial, that is, the trial of Japanese war criminals in accordance with the Charter of the International military Tribunal in the far East after the second World War. The Tokyo trial punished the war criminals by legal means, and has been able to crack down on the Japanese militarist forces and their followers. But all along, the right-wing forces in Japan have been hanging around, and the militarist ideological trend has been rife, repeatedly attempting to reverse the case for the history of aggression. And tried to deny the Tokyo trial. Our people know little about Tokyo trial, and even less about the international criminal law involved in Tokyo trial. This paper is divided into five parts to analyze and study the legal problems in Tokyo trial. The first part summarizes the process of Tokyo trial, the second part expounds the legal problems in Tokyo trial in detail, including four aspects: procedure, entity, responsibility and penalty execution. The third part is the reason analysis and legal theory analysis of the second part, the fourth part discusses the enlightenment and influence of Tokyo trial on the development of international criminal law. The fifth part is a summary of the influence of Tokyo trial politics. In a word, this paper tries to analyze the legal disputes existing in the Tokyo trial, the causes and the influence on the development of the international criminal law from the legal point of view. Attempts to deny history, to deny the legitimacy of the Tokyo trial, the forces and doctrines of legitimacy respond with legal power. At the same time, this article to commemorate the war victims, alert people to remember history, cherish peace.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：K153;D995

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬呈元;;德國(guó)和日本對(duì)待歷史態(tài)度不同的原因——從紐倫堡審判和東京審判的區(qū)別說起[J];中國(guó)黨政干部論壇;2015年09期

2 王帶;;自然法學(xué)與分析實(shí)證主義法學(xué)的法理實(shí)踐[J];法制與社會(huì);2015年25期

3 朱文奇;;東京審判與追究侵略之罪責(zé)[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2015年04期

4 宋志勇;;紐倫堡審判與東京審判之比較[J];東北亞論壇;2015年02期

5 王勤勤;陳中丁;;法律正義的實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑——以紐倫堡審判為視角[J];赤峰學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(漢文哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年05期

6 劉庭華;;日本軍國(guó)主義思潮死灰復(fù)燃的歷史淵源[J];日本侵華史研究;2013年04期

7 劉立偉;;中日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)遺留問題的源頭——東京審判與《舊金山和約》[J];滄桑;2013年02期

8 劉向紅;;遠(yuǎn)東國(guó)際軍事法庭審判中的刑事訴訟問題[J];上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(法治論叢);2012年03期

9 蔣秀蘭;李青;;紐倫堡法庭對(duì)國(guó)際刑事訴訟創(chuàng)制的意義[J];鐵道警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

10 劉庭華;;東京審判的歷史功績(jī)與缺憾[J];軍事歷史;2011年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2135696