發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-08 17:24

  本文選題：蘇南沖突 + 莫斯科三黨會(huì)議�。� 參考：《曲阜師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：蘇南沖突是20世紀(jì)國(guó)際關(guān)系中的重要事件之一。第二次世界大戰(zhàn)后，在蘇聯(lián)的推動(dòng)下，社會(huì)主義制度從蘇聯(lián)走出國(guó)門(mén)，由一國(guó)變成了多國(guó)，在東歐建立了一系列的社會(huì)主義政權(quán)。冷戰(zhàn)爆發(fā)后，這些社會(huì)主義國(guó)家形成了一個(gè)鐵桶一般的陣營(yíng)，與以美國(guó)為首的資本主義國(guó)家進(jìn)行抗衡。然而，鐵板一塊的共產(chǎn)主義同盟并沒(méi)有維持多久，1948年曾被認(rèn)為是蘇聯(lián)最忠誠(chéng)的盟友南斯拉夫與蘇聯(lián)發(fā)生了激烈的沖突，這也就證明了鐵板一塊的共產(chǎn)主義同盟只不過(guò)是一種神話。 蘇南沖突是當(dāng)時(shí)國(guó)際共產(chǎn)主義運(yùn)動(dòng)的第一次分裂，它對(duì)整個(gè)國(guó)際共產(chǎn)主義運(yùn)動(dòng)來(lái)說(shuō)是一個(gè)悲劇。以往學(xué)者在研究蘇南沖突時(shí)，基本上僅僅局限于在當(dāng)代國(guó)際共產(chǎn)主義運(yùn)動(dòng)的框架內(nèi)研究和分析蘇南沖突，而本文認(rèn)為，蘇南沖突與冷戰(zhàn)有著密切的聯(lián)系，應(yīng)該把蘇南沖突放在東西方冷戰(zhàn)的格局下進(jìn)行研究。這主要是因?yàn)�，其一，蘇南爆發(fā)沖突的一個(gè)重要因素是雙方在如何應(yīng)對(duì)西方冷戰(zhàn)政策問(wèn)題上出現(xiàn)了分歧，其二，蘇南沖突也正好發(fā)生在冷戰(zhàn)對(duì)峙最為尖銳的時(shí)期。本文試圖通過(guò)借助俄羅斯及東歐國(guó)家在冷戰(zhàn)后解密公布的部分歷史檔案資料，從國(guó)際關(guān)系的角度探討蘇南沖突的起點(diǎn)，即1948年蘇、南、保三黨莫斯科會(huì)議，圍繞著這一會(huì)議召開(kāi)前后的相關(guān)問(wèn)題，通過(guò)論證，探析蘇南沖突的根本原因。 在寫(xiě)作過(guò)程中，本文共分為三個(gè)大部分：第一部分論述了1948年蘇南保三黨莫斯科會(huì)議召開(kāi)的歷史背景。在這一部分中主要論述了兩方面的內(nèi)容，第一，從南斯拉夫在戰(zhàn)后選擇社會(huì)主義制度，實(shí)行“一邊倒”的外交政策、與蘇聯(lián)站在同一陣營(yíng)共同應(yīng)對(duì)馬歇爾計(jì)劃以及蘇南共同籌備建立共產(chǎn)黨情報(bào)局等歷史事件，論述了蘇南兩國(guó)在戰(zhàn)后初期相互之間的親密關(guān)系，從而得出直到1948年初，南斯拉夫一直都是蘇聯(lián)最忠實(shí)的盟友和追隨者。第二，通過(guò)論述蘇南兩國(guó)在的里雅斯特的歸屬問(wèn)題、經(jīng)濟(jì)關(guān)系問(wèn)題、建立巴爾干聯(lián)邦問(wèn)題以及在社會(huì)政治生活中的一系列問(wèn)題上的摩擦，得出兩國(guó)在表面的親密友好關(guān)系之下實(shí)際上早已齷齪叢生，這也預(yù)示了一場(chǎng)大的沖突的爆發(fā)。第二部分論述了蘇南在黨莫斯科會(huì)議上斗爭(zhēng)的主要議題，同時(shí)也是蘇南兩黨、兩國(guó)斗爭(zhēng)的焦點(diǎn)。通過(guò)論述蘇南在南保關(guān)系問(wèn)題、南阿關(guān)系問(wèn)題、希臘內(nèi)戰(zhàn)問(wèn)題上的不可調(diào)和的矛盾，揭示出蘇南沖突爆發(fā)的必然性。同時(shí)也正是這次會(huì)談，成為蘇南兩黨、兩國(guó)從友好合作走向全面、公開(kāi)對(duì)抗的分水嶺。第三部分作為文章的結(jié)束部分，主要論述了蘇南爆發(fā)沖突的根本原因。蘇南雙方在意識(shí)形態(tài)方面的論戰(zhàn)只是蘇南沖突的外在表現(xiàn)形式，其深層次的原因則是由于國(guó)際形勢(shì)的變化，雙方在對(duì)外戰(zhàn)略上產(chǎn)生了矛盾和對(duì)抗。這種矛盾和對(duì)抗又主要表現(xiàn)在雙方對(duì)巴爾干地區(qū)的爭(zhēng)奪，即南斯拉夫試圖在蘇聯(lián)范圍內(nèi)建立一個(gè)巴爾干聯(lián)邦的計(jì)劃與蘇聯(lián)的東歐一體化方案發(fā)生了碰撞，，這種激烈的碰撞，就使得蘇南之間沖突的爆發(fā)再所難免了。
[Abstract]:The conflict in South of Jiangsu was one of the most important events in international relations in twentieth Century. After the Second World War, under the impetus of the Soviet Union, the socialist system came out of the Soviet Union from the Soviet Union and became a multinational country and established a series of socialist regimes in Eastern Europe. After the outbreak of the cold war, these socialist countries formed a general camp, Against the capitalist countries headed by the United States, however, the iron plate of the Communist alliance did not last long, and in 1948, the most loyal ally of the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, had been clash with the Soviet Union, which proved that the iron alliance was only a myth.
The South of Jiangsu conflict is the first division of the international communist movement at that time. It is a tragedy for the entire international communist movement. In the past, scholars in the past were only confined to the study and analysis of the South of Jiangsu conflict in the framework of the contemporary international communism movement, and this article holds that the conflict between South of Jiangsu and the cold war is in South of Jiangsu. Closely linked, the South of Jiangsu conflict should be studied under the cold war situation between the East and the West. This is mainly because one of the important factors for the outbreak of the conflict in South of Jiangsu is the differences between the two sides on how to deal with the western cold war policy, and the second, the South of Jiangsu conflict happened in the most acute period of the Cold War confrontation. Through the use of Russian and Eastern European countries to decrypt some of the historical records published after the cold war, the starting point of the South of Jiangsu conflict is discussed from the perspective of international relations, namely, the 1948 Soviet, South, and the three party Moscow Conference, around the related issues before and after the meeting, and the fundamental reasons for the conflict in South of Jiangsu.
In the process of writing, this article is divided into three parts: the first part deals with the historical background of the convening of the Moscow Conference of the three party of South of Jiangsu Bao in 1948. In this part, it mainly discusses the content of two aspects. First, from the post-war Yugoslavia, the socialist system was selected and the "one-sided" foreign policy was carried out, and the same as the Soviet Union. The camps jointly responded to the Marshall plan and South of Jiangsu's joint preparations for the establishment of the Communist Party intelligence service and other historical events, and discussed the close relationship between South of Jiangsu and the two countries in the early postwar period. Thus, until the beginning of 1948, Yugoslavia had always been the most loyal ally and followers of the Soviet Union. Second, through the discussion of the South of Jiangsu two countries in Li Ya. The problem of attribution, economic relations, the establishment of the Balkan federal problem and a series of frictions in the social and political life have come to the conclusion that the two countries have long been filthy under the intimate and friendly relations of the two countries, which also foreshadows a big conflict. The second part deals with the struggle of South of Jiangsu in the party Moscow Conference. The main issue of the dispute is also the focus of the two parties and the struggle between the two parties in South of Jiangsu. Through the discussion of the irreconcilable contradiction between the South Arab relations, the South Arab relations and the Greek civil war, the inevitability of the outbreak of the South of Jiangsu conflict is revealed by South of Jiangsu. It is also the meeting of the two parties in South of Jiangsu, and the two countries move from friendly cooperation to a comprehensive and open country. The third part, as the end of the article, mainly discusses the fundamental causes of the outbreak of the conflict in South of Jiangsu. The ideological debate between the two sides of South of Jiangsu is only the external manifestation of the conflict in South of Jiangsu, and its deep level is due to the changes in the international situation and the contradiction and confrontation between the two sides in the foreign strategy. The contradiction and confrontation are mainly reflected in the contention between the two sides in the Balkans. That is, the attempt of Yugoslavia to establish a Balkan Union in the Soviet Union and the Soviet Union's Eastern European integration program collide, which makes the explosion of the conflict between South of Jiangsu unavoidable.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K153

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沈志華;;“鐵托道路”是怎么形成的?——一九四八年蘇南沖突始末[J];百年潮;1999年10期

2 張盛發(fā);1948-1949年蘇南沖突原因新探[J];當(dāng)代世界社會(huì)主義問(wèn)題;2000年01期

3 沈志華，張盛發(fā);從大國(guó)合作到集團(tuán)對(duì)抗──論戰(zhàn)后斯大林對(duì)外政策的轉(zhuǎn)變（根據(jù)俄國(guó)檔案的新材料）[J];東歐中亞研究;1996年06期

4 郝承敦;論冷戰(zhàn)初期蘇南在東歐地區(qū)的戰(zhàn)略分歧[J];國(guó)際論壇;1999年04期

5 郝承敦;;論蘇南沖突中的希臘因素[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

6 金重遠(yuǎn);阿爾巴尼亞和蘇南、蘇中沖突[J];歷史教學(xué)問(wèn)題;2000年02期

7 沈志華;1948年蘇南沖突起因的歷史考察——來(lái)自俄國(guó)及東歐國(guó)家解密檔案的新證據(jù)[J];歷史研究;1999年04期

8 金重遠(yuǎn);馬克思主義?民族主義?──1948年蘇南沖突的再審視[J];史林;2000年01期

9 郝承敦,方建新;論蘇南沖突的根本原因[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2004年06期

10 郝承敦;;論20世紀(jì)40年代末期南阿交惡的緣由[J];齊魯學(xué)刊;2008年06期

本文編號(hào)：2108168