英國協(xié)助張格爾襲擾南疆真?zhèn)慰?/H1>
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-05-29 01:53
本文選題:英屬印度 + 浩罕汗國; 參考:《國際漢學(xué)》2017年03期
【摘要】:本文對我國學(xué)界有關(guān)嘉道時(shí)期英國協(xié)助流亡和卓張格爾襲擾南疆的論點(diǎn)和論據(jù)提出質(zhì)疑,進(jìn)而通過分析相關(guān)中英俄文獻(xiàn)資料論證英國并未直接介入張格爾事件。在此基礎(chǔ)上,文章討論19世紀(jì)英俄中亞爭霸醞釀時(shí)期,部分英國人士從中亞和廣州兩條渠道搜集張格爾事件情報(bào)并予以分析,進(jìn)而對清朝的新疆治理、浩罕與新疆的關(guān)系和中亞局勢做出研判,指出英俄向中亞和新疆進(jìn)行地緣和貿(mào)易擴(kuò)張的前景。英國人士對張格爾事件的討論為英商促發(fā)鴉片戰(zhàn)爭和推動(dòng)英屬印度中亞擴(kuò)張?zhí)峁┝藚⒖肌?br/>[Abstract]:This paper challenges the arguments and arguments of Chinese academic circles concerning the British assistance to exile and Zhuo Zhanggel's harassment of southern Xinjiang during the Jia Dao period, and then proves that Britain has not been directly involved in the Zhanggel incident through the analysis of relevant Chinese, British and Russian literature. On this basis, the article discusses the brewing period of British and Russian hegemony in Central Asia in the 19th century. Some British people collected and analyzed Zhang GE's information from two channels in Central Asia and Guangzhou, and then managed Xinjiang in the Qing Dynasty. Haohan's relations with Xinjiang and the situation in Central Asia are studied and judged, pointing out the prospects for Britain and Russia to expand geographically and trade into Central Asia and Xinjiang. The British discussion of the Zhanggel incident provided a reference for British business to promote the Opium War and to promote the expansion of British India in Central Asia.
【作者單位】: 深圳大學(xué)師范學(xué)院;
【基金】:“深圳大學(xué)人文社會(huì)科學(xué)青年教師扶持項(xiàng)目”“晚清中亞政治與新疆建省改革”(項(xiàng)目編號:15QNFC15)的階段性成果
【分類號】:K107
,
本文編號:1949043
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/1949043.html
本文選題:英屬印度 + 浩罕汗國; 參考:《國際漢學(xué)》2017年03期
【摘要】:本文對我國學(xué)界有關(guān)嘉道時(shí)期英國協(xié)助流亡和卓張格爾襲擾南疆的論點(diǎn)和論據(jù)提出質(zhì)疑,進(jìn)而通過分析相關(guān)中英俄文獻(xiàn)資料論證英國并未直接介入張格爾事件。在此基礎(chǔ)上,文章討論19世紀(jì)英俄中亞爭霸醞釀時(shí)期,部分英國人士從中亞和廣州兩條渠道搜集張格爾事件情報(bào)并予以分析,進(jìn)而對清朝的新疆治理、浩罕與新疆的關(guān)系和中亞局勢做出研判,指出英俄向中亞和新疆進(jìn)行地緣和貿(mào)易擴(kuò)張的前景。英國人士對張格爾事件的討論為英商促發(fā)鴉片戰(zhàn)爭和推動(dòng)英屬印度中亞擴(kuò)張?zhí)峁┝藚⒖肌?br/>[Abstract]:This paper challenges the arguments and arguments of Chinese academic circles concerning the British assistance to exile and Zhuo Zhanggel's harassment of southern Xinjiang during the Jia Dao period, and then proves that Britain has not been directly involved in the Zhanggel incident through the analysis of relevant Chinese, British and Russian literature. On this basis, the article discusses the brewing period of British and Russian hegemony in Central Asia in the 19th century. Some British people collected and analyzed Zhang GE's information from two channels in Central Asia and Guangzhou, and then managed Xinjiang in the Qing Dynasty. Haohan's relations with Xinjiang and the situation in Central Asia are studied and judged, pointing out the prospects for Britain and Russia to expand geographically and trade into Central Asia and Xinjiang. The British discussion of the Zhanggel incident provided a reference for British business to promote the Opium War and to promote the expansion of British India in Central Asia.
【作者單位】: 深圳大學(xué)師范學(xué)院;
【基金】:“深圳大學(xué)人文社會(huì)科學(xué)青年教師扶持項(xiàng)目”“晚清中亞政治與新疆建省改革”(項(xiàng)目編號:15QNFC15)的階段性成果
【分類號】:K107
,
本文編號:1949043
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/1949043.html
最近更新
教材專著