戰(zhàn)后日本賠償外交研究(1945-1977)
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-05-23 23:50
本文選題:戰(zhàn)后 + 日本 ; 參考:《吉林大學(xué)》2010年博士論文
【摘要】: 日本的“賠償外交”是第二次世界大戰(zhàn)結(jié)束后,日本戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)善后處理過(guò)程中突顯出來(lái)的獨(dú)特的外交現(xiàn)象,它不同于一般的經(jīng)濟(jì)外交、資源外交、文化外交等外交方式,而是具有其特定的內(nèi)涵。對(duì)此,需要我們從戰(zhàn)后賠償?shù)闹黧w、內(nèi)容、特征、形式等方面進(jìn)行清晰的梳理、界定和理論闡釋。日本的賠償外交總體上先后經(jīng)歷了兩個(gè)階段,在不同的歷史階段,日本的賠償外交具有不同的涵義。從賠償主導(dǎo)權(quán)的變化看,由“美國(guó)主導(dǎo)下的日本賠償”轉(zhuǎn)向“日本操作下的戰(zhàn)后賠償”;從賠償?shù)男问娇?由戰(zhàn)后初期的懲罰性“拆遷賠償”轉(zhuǎn)化為冷戰(zhàn)時(shí)期的協(xié)商性“勞務(wù)賠償、資本賠償”。在這樣的歷史演變過(guò)程中,日本經(jīng)過(guò)長(zhǎng)時(shí)段、艱苦的賠償外交交涉,實(shí)現(xiàn)了以善后賠償為契機(jī),開(kāi)發(fā)東南亞市場(chǎng),復(fù)興本國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì),并從此走上國(guó)際政治舞臺(tái)的戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo)。賠償外交的實(shí)施,既鞏固了日美同盟關(guān)系,提高本國(guó)外交的自主性,又逃脫了嚴(yán)厲的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)處理和賠償。這是由于二戰(zhàn)后東西方對(duì)峙的冷戰(zhàn)體制、日美安保體制和日本奉行的經(jīng)濟(jì)中心主義取向所使然。 本文針對(duì)日本賠償外交的歷史演變,從體系、國(guó)家(包括美國(guó)和東南亞諸國(guó))、個(gè)體三個(gè)層次對(duì)其形成的原因及其影響進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)分析。隨著日本賠償外交在東亞范圍內(nèi)的實(shí)施,日本在政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、國(guó)際影響等方面獲得了重大收獲,在一定程度上構(gòu)成了日本經(jīng)濟(jì)崛起的重要因素,客觀上也對(duì)受償國(guó)家的戰(zhàn)后經(jīng)濟(jì)重建起到了促進(jìn)作用。但是,在實(shí)施賠償?shù)倪^(guò)程中,由于日本沒(méi)有徹底解決戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)賠償問(wèn)題,特別是沒(méi)有深刻地反省戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)責(zé)任,沒(méi)有對(duì)受害國(guó)家和民眾誠(chéng)懇地給予道歉與補(bǔ)償,反而以善后賠償為手段,推崇經(jīng)濟(jì)利益至上主義,大搞經(jīng)濟(jì)擴(kuò)張,追逐商業(yè)利益,忽視了國(guó)際道義與正義,從而導(dǎo)致了周邊國(guó)家反日、厭日情緒長(zhǎng)期難以化解,成為相互認(rèn)知上的主要障礙之一。事實(shí)上,日本的賠償外交并沒(méi)有從根本上消弭飽受其戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)侵害的亞洲各國(guó)民眾的反日情結(jié),這在很大程度上消解了日本提升國(guó)際形象的能量,從而使日本不得不面對(duì)“經(jīng)濟(jì)巨人”與“政治侏儒”長(zhǎng)期并存的現(xiàn)實(shí)。
[Abstract]:Japan's "compensation diplomacy" is a unique diplomatic phenomenon in the process of dealing with the aftermath of the Japanese war after the end of the second World War. It is different from other diplomatic methods such as economic diplomacy, resource diplomacy, cultural diplomacy and so on. It has its specific connotation. Therefore, we need to clearly comb, define and explain the subject, content, feature and form of postwar compensation. Japan's compensation diplomacy has experienced two stages in general. In different historical stages, Japan's compensation diplomacy has different meanings. From the perspective of the change of the dominant right of compensation, from "Japanese compensation under the leadership of the United States" to "post-war compensation under Japanese operation," and from the form of compensation, From punitive "demolition compensation" in the early postwar period to "labor compensation, capital compensation" in the Cold War period. In the course of this historical evolution, Japan achieved the strategic goal of exploiting the Southeast Asian market, reviving its economy and stepping onto the international political stage after a long and arduous diplomatic negotiation on compensation. The implementation of compensatory diplomacy not only consolidated the alliance between Japan and the United States, enhanced the autonomy of its own diplomacy, but also escaped severe war treatment and compensation. This is due to the cold war system of East-West confrontation after World War II, the Japanese-American security system and the economic centralism of Japan. In view of the historical evolution of Japan's compensation diplomacy, this paper makes a systematic analysis of the reasons for its formation and its influence from three levels: the system, the country (including the United States and the Southeast Asian countries) and the individual. With the implementation of Japan's compensatory diplomacy in East Asia, Japan has gained significant gains in politics, economy and international influence, which to a certain extent constitutes an important factor in Japan's economic rise. Objectively, it also played a role in promoting the postwar economic reconstruction of the compensated countries. However, in the process of implementing compensation, because Japan has not completely resolved the issue of war compensation, in particular, it has not deeply reflected on its war responsibilities, and has not sincerely apologized and compensated the affected countries and the people, on the contrary, it has used compensation for the aftermath of the war as a means. Advocating the supremacy of economic interests, pursuing economic expansion, pursuing commercial interests and neglecting international morality and justice have led to the anti-Japanese sentiment of neighboring countries, which has become one of the main obstacles to mutual cognition for a long time. In fact, Japan's compensatory diplomacy has not fundamentally eliminated the anti-Japanese complex of the people of Asian countries that have suffered from its war, which to a large extent dispels Japan's ability to enhance its international image. Therefore, Japan has to face the reality that "economic giant" and "political dwarf" coexist for a long time.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2010
【分類號(hào)】:K313.5
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 萬(wàn)文秀;二戰(zhàn)期間日澳關(guān)系及其對(duì)戰(zhàn)后雙方的影響[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年
,本文編號(hào):1926877
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/1926877.html
最近更新
教材專著