本文選題：非法印書 + 書報(bào)審查制�。� 參考：《武漢大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文

【摘要】： 從亨利八世到詹姆士一世的一個(gè)世紀(jì)是英國對(duì)出版管制最有效的時(shí)期:王室特權(quán)、專利壟斷、許可制度和書商公會(huì)的注冊(cè)登記都成為審查的有力手段。但是在王權(quán)定義“合法”的書籍之前,這種相對(duì)意義上的“非法印書”就已出現(xiàn),這主要是因?yàn)槲乃噺?fù)興、科學(xué)革命、宗教改革給人們帶來的對(duì)傳統(tǒng)的正統(tǒng)思想的挑戰(zhàn),這些被視為“異端”的書籍組成了最早的“非法印書”。隨著資產(chǎn)階級(jí)的興起,以宣傳清教思想、反對(duì)王權(quán)為內(nèi)容的一系列書籍大量涌現(xiàn),政府運(yùn)用書報(bào)審查制度對(duì)其進(jìn)行查禁,將其列為“非法”;除此之外還有中小印刷商為了謀求經(jīng)濟(jì)利益而盜印的特權(quán)書,也成為了“非法印書”的構(gòu)成部分。因此文中將“非法印書”以謀利與非謀利為相對(duì)界限劃分為兩類,這兩種“非法印書”都挑戰(zhàn)了當(dāng)時(shí)的書報(bào)審查制度。尤其需要注意的是非謀利性的“非法印書”,因?yàn)樗麄髁朔磳?duì)現(xiàn)行政治制度的思想和觀點(diǎn),并且在散播的過程中引起了民眾的關(guān)注與討論,所以對(duì)于打破王權(quán)的專制、調(diào)動(dòng)公眾的參與性以及最后形成公眾的輿論都起到了推動(dòng)作用。而挑戰(zhàn)了王權(quán),也就動(dòng)搖了書報(bào)審查的基礎(chǔ),所以,“非法印書”最終將書報(bào)審查制推向了消亡。
[Abstract]:The century from Henry VIII to James I was the most effective period of British publishing control: royal privileges, patent monopolies, licensing systems, and bookseller registration were powerful means of censorship. But before Wang Quan defined "legal" books, this relative "illegal printing" had emerged, largely because of the challenge to traditional orthodoxy brought about by the Renaissance, scientific revolution, and religious reform. These are regarded as "heresy" books constitute the earliest "illegal printing". With the rise of the bourgeoisie, a series of books which propagandized Puritanism and opposed Wang Quan emerged in large numbers, and the government used the censorship system of books and newspapers to ban it and classified it as "illegal". In addition, there are small and medium-sized printers in order to seek economic interests to steal the printing of the privileged book, also became "illegal printing" part of the book. Therefore, the paper divides "illegal printing book" into two categories: profit and non-profit. These two kinds of "illegal printing" both challenge the censorship system of books and newspapers at that time. Special attention should be paid to the "illegal printing" of non-profit-seeking books, because it propagates ideas and views against the current political system and has aroused public concern and discussion in the process of dissemination, so it is necessary to break up the autocracy of Wang Quan. Mobilization of public participation and ultimately the formation of public opinion have played a role in promoting. And challenged Wang Quan, also shook the basis of censorship of books and newspapers, so, the illegal printing of books and newspapers to the end of the censorship system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：K561.33

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 張乃和;論近代英國版權(quán)制度的形成[J];世界歷史;2004年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1836663